Grades from Idiots

Lost User

ditto :)

C0d3_P03t

Anup Shinde wrote:

ditto

Lol what does ditto mean? :)

Cheers

Monty2

Well i never complain about the one voters.. what i do complain about are the people who would use your code and still won't rate anything.

C++ where friends have access to your private members !

Lost User

Strange that u dint know it...:sigh: neways a detailed explanation here: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGIH,GGIH:2007-05,GGIH:en&q=define%3aditto[^]

C0d3_P03t

ohhhh got it hehe thanks :) Expanded my horizons hehe

Cheers

Arman S

Ok, if it deserves 1 then let the grade be one. But I was disappointed about the fact that all my articles were graded [at the same time] 1. what i do complain about are the people who would use your code and still won't rate anything. This happens much more frequently than 1s :) This is another story to speak about though. Personally I grade not so frequently, though when doing it, my grades are to the artices and their content not something else.

-- ===== Arman

Marc Clifton

Arman Z. Sahakyan wrote:

Just recently someone graded 1s for my articles.

Just 1 1? You should consider yourself lucky. Marc

Thyme In The Country
Interacx

People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

realJSOP

Yeah, he should look at some of my articles.

"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

JimmyRopes

I don't because they are rated too low! :-D

Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

PIEBALDconsult

I think of 1s on my articles as, "I don't need that right now, but I'll remember it when I do". A 5 means, "What perfect timing! Just what I needed right now!" A 3 means, "Where were you last week when I needed that?"

ushering

Maybe some of those people are like me... new to c#, needing some code to play with, don't know enough to determine if the code we are pulling deserves a 1 or a 5. I won't feel confident grading for at least another six months. And even then only on articles that cover ground I have worked with directly. In the meantime I may use some code posted on this board in adherence with the attached licenses. When I do start voting my scale will go something like this: 5 = Clear presentation of a technique I have worked with including optimization or restructuring that had not occured to me and/or applications of the technique that had not occurred to me. 3 = Decent presentation of a technique I have worked with... would have been helpful for me to read while I was learning that technique, but I did just as well without the article. 1 = Something I could implement or explain much better even though I am a c# noob. No Score = I am thouroughly unqualified to evaluate. I don't even feel qualified to comment on c# code yet. ANyone feel this is a bad approach? Regards, And thanks for the code.