Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. What you're not getting about Ruby

What you're not getting about Ruby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
rubyhtmlcom
25 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Paul Watson

    Ah no, the Java and C++ guys feel afraid of using a language that is not strongly-typed. i.e. Ruby is not strongly-typed. But I've seen half a dozen different ways of describing the same type systems so it doesn't really matter.

    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

    Shog9 wrote:

    And with that, Paul closed his browser, sipped his herbal tea, fixed the flower in his hair, and smiled brightly at the multitude of cute, furry animals flocking around the grassy hillside where he sat coding Ruby on his Mac...

    A Offline
    A Offline
    A A 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Paul Watson wrote:

    Ah no, the Java and C++ guys feel afraid of using a language that is not strongly-typed.

    Than again the Java guys tell the C++ guys the need to manually manipulate memory is not always necessary. :) Though context (i.e. domain/application/business needs) is really important in these types of discussions (unless they have some sort of phobia and can't stand being around dynamically typed languages)

    Paul Watson wrote:

    i.e. Ruby is not strongly-typed.

    Ruby is usually considered strongly typed... It's closer to Java than JavaScript in that respect.

    Who is the creator? Finding Allah (Video) Surah Al-An'aam (Ayah 74-110)

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A A A 0

      Paul Watson wrote:

      Ah no, the Java and C++ guys feel afraid of using a language that is not strongly-typed.

      Than again the Java guys tell the C++ guys the need to manually manipulate memory is not always necessary. :) Though context (i.e. domain/application/business needs) is really important in these types of discussions (unless they have some sort of phobia and can't stand being around dynamically typed languages)

      Paul Watson wrote:

      i.e. Ruby is not strongly-typed.

      Ruby is usually considered strongly typed... It's closer to Java than JavaScript in that respect.

      Who is the creator? Finding Allah (Video) Surah Al-An'aam (Ayah 74-110)

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Watson
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      A.A. wrote:

      Ruby is usually considered strongly typed

      Usually in some circles and usually not in others. The Java guys here refuse to accept that Ruby is strongly typed and in my way of thinking I agree with them. Ruby in my head is dynamically typed or runtime typed. Frankly though you can call it Cat In The Hat typed for all I care. The language works well in my domain. (not saying you said it didn't :) )

      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

      Shog9 wrote:

      And with that, Paul closed his browser, sipped his herbal tea, fixed the flower in his hair, and smiled brightly at the multitude of cute, furry animals flocking around the grassy hillside where he sat coding Ruby on his Mac...

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        A.A. wrote:

        Ruby is usually considered strongly typed

        Usually in some circles and usually not in others. The Java guys here refuse to accept that Ruby is strongly typed and in my way of thinking I agree with them. Ruby in my head is dynamically typed or runtime typed. Frankly though you can call it Cat In The Hat typed for all I care. The language works well in my domain. (not saying you said it didn't :) )

        regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

        Shog9 wrote:

        And with that, Paul closed his browser, sipped his herbal tea, fixed the flower in his hair, and smiled brightly at the multitude of cute, furry animals flocking around the grassy hillside where he sat coding Ruby on his Mac...

        A Offline
        A Offline
        A A 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Paul Watson wrote:

        Usually in some circles and usually not in others. The Java guys here refuse to accept that Ruby is strongly typed and in my way of thinking I agree with them. Ruby in my head is dynamically typed or runtime typed.

        Maybe they don't really see the difference between Strongly/Weakly typed vs Statically/Dynamically typed... There is a big Difference.

        Paul Watson wrote:

        Frankly though you can call it Cat In The Hat typed for all I care. The language works well in my domain. (not saying you said it didn't )

        :cool:

        Who is the creator? Finding Allah (Video) Surah Al-An'aam (Ayah 74-110)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • _ _Damian S_

          If you want to see the matrix, take the red pill... or was it the blue one? :cool: ------------------------------------- Damian - matrix? how about a hash #

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chuck Richards
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          lolololol. thats too good

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Judah Gabriel Himango

            Scott Hanselman blogs about all the fuss over the Ruby language[^]. :cool:

            Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Repentance The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Sphyr
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            What am I not getting from Ruby... many.. Can it be used on 3D Simulator project without tricky tricks, speed kill, and memory bloat? Ruby and all 'virtual machined' language is a no-no for that kind of project.:~ So what I am not getting in Ruby is.. manual memory management. For Web Apps ruby is more than great..;P

            -- God will not change people fate until they change it themselves --

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups