VB as a tool

Paul M Watt

Is the general concensus on CP that VB is an inferior language. or Does anybody look at it as a tool that can be used effectively under the right circumstances?

Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day
Light a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life!

Michael P Butler

I use VB for testing my ATL com objects. I still find VB quicker for COM test bed apps rather than using C++. I also use VB a lot to create mock-ups of screens for my functional specifications. Although I may start using C# from now on. I don't know how inferior it is, I've just been doing C++ too long that anything big in VB seems cumbersome. Michael :-)

James T Johnson

kilowatt wrote: Does anybody look at it as a tool that can be used effectively under the right circumstances? Preach on brotha :-D James Simplicity Rules!

Prem Kumar

Yes, VB is definately a good tool, You can test out concepts you are not actually clear before you write lots of code in c++. Also as a client ( for testing ). Yes definately, its a very very useful tool save lots of unessecary work.

Chris Losinger

i'll choose B, final answer. -c

Cheap oil. It's worth it!

ISEffects - effects for images

Matt Gullett

A tool like any other. Less powerful than C++, but for some situations far superior in terms of productivity and time-to-deliver. Also a good prototyping tool and test bed for COM objects.

David Stone

I think I may be the only VB programmer on here.:) Of course, I use VB.Net, so I am just as effective as any of you are. ;P David Stone dstone@newcenturytitle.com
MEEKNESS, n. Uncommon patience in planning a revenge that is worth while. The Devil's Dictionary, Ambrose Bierce

Paul M Watt

I am surprised from all of these answers, I thought there was a larger anti-VB sentiment.:) Maybe it is just the few people that really hate VB stand-out. They must have had a bad run-in with a VB developer and continue to dwell in the past:)

Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day
Light a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life!

Prem Kumar

Matt Gullett wrote: Also a good prototyping tool and test bed for COM objects Thats what it is! And the best thing is you can do almost every thing with the new features which usually have a COM base.

Matt Gullett

Many people seem to treat C++ (JAVA also) as a religion. To them anthing else sucks.

Jason Henderson

I prefer C++, but when you have to use a "tool" like PowerBuilder (at work), VB is a god-send. Like it or not, I'm right.

Nemanja Trifunovic

VB as a language is inferior, but as a RAD tool can be very useful sometimes. I really fail to understand why there is no real RAD environment for C++. :confused: I vote pro drink :beer:

Paul M Watt

There is Borland's C++ Builder, however I developed with this for a year with verison 4.0, and I thought it was a piece of crap. C++ Builder created their own windows library components that you use which is call Visual Component Library. VCL is actually the object's that are used in Delphi. I still prefer Visual Basic for a RAD. RAD - Rabid Application Development:)

Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day
Light a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life!

ColinDavies

kilowatt wrote: general concensus Is a general concensus the same as a general consensus ? Regardz Colin J Davies

Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

More about me :-)

Nemanja Trifunovic

Maybe I should have said: "I really fail to understand why there is no decent RAD environment for C++." :) I vote pro drink :beer:

Joao Vaz

Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: I really fail to understand why there is no real RAD environment for C++. Wrong! We have Borland C++ Builder 6 (this fully suports Partial Template Specialization) and IBM Visual Age C++ version ;P Concerning Borland C++ Builder 6, I'm waiting the FREE personal edition of it , to play with :-) And the Kylix C++ version for linux too :rolleyes: Cheers, Joao Vaz A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person - Natalie Portman (Padme/Amidala of Star Wars)

Paul M Watt

Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Maybe I should have said: "I really fail to understand why there is no decent RAD environment for C++." Point well taken.:)

Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day
Light a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life!

Paul M Watt

Only on the 3rd Tuesday in May for an even numbered year. Oh, it looks like it is my lucky day!:):):)

Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day
Light a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life!

peterchen

YOu obviously never met Paul Watson ;P

The earth is not dying. It is being killed.

Christian Graus

David Stone wrote: Of course, I use VB.Net, so I am just as effective as any of you are. As effective as any C# programmers you mean ? Or any other CLR language except C++. Managed C++ is in fact faster than VB/C#, it is optimised. And native C++ canes them all. But as I often say to Paul Watson ( who uses VB ), just because you've made a poor choice in terms of programming language does not mean we think any less of you, so don't fret about it :-) Christian The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little. And you don't spend much time with the opposite sex working day and night, unless the pizza delivery person happens to be young, cute, single and female. I can assure you, I've consumed more than a programmer's allotment of pizza, and these conditions have never aligned. - Christopher Duncan - 18/04/2002