Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. microsoft tries to patent context advertising?

microsoft tries to patent context advertising?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmldatabasequestion
4 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Allen Anderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Sorry if this has been posted already but I searched back and didn't find anything. Microsoft's patent application is here http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070157227%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070157227&RS=DN/20070157227[^] some quotes "11. The computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions of claim 10, wherein the another source is at least one of user document files, user email, user music files, podcast files, computer status messages, and a profile database storing existing tag data. " so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff. lots of people on slashdot discussing this as well here http://slashdot.org/articles/07/07/14/043200.shtml[^] what does everyone else think of this stuff? I'm not a fan of software patents at all as I'm sick of seeing obvious inventions (including this one) patented and used as a club against smaller software shops. And further, I think using the private content of our personal computers to target us for ads is pretty awful as well.

    J M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Allen Anderson

      Sorry if this has been posted already but I searched back and didn't find anything. Microsoft's patent application is here http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070157227%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070157227&RS=DN/20070157227[^] some quotes "11. The computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions of claim 10, wherein the another source is at least one of user document files, user email, user music files, podcast files, computer status messages, and a profile database storing existing tag data. " so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff. lots of people on slashdot discussing this as well here http://slashdot.org/articles/07/07/14/043200.shtml[^] what does everyone else think of this stuff? I'm not a fan of software patents at all as I'm sick of seeing obvious inventions (including this one) patented and used as a club against smaller software shops. And further, I think using the private content of our personal computers to target us for ads is pretty awful as well.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Josh Smith
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Allen Anderson wrote:

      so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff.

      Gmail bases its advertisements on the content of your emails. That's nothing new, unfortunately. :sigh:

      :josh: My WPF Blog[^] The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it. - Michelangelo (1475-1564)

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Allen Anderson

        Sorry if this has been posted already but I searched back and didn't find anything. Microsoft's patent application is here http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070157227%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070157227&RS=DN/20070157227[^] some quotes "11. The computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions of claim 10, wherein the another source is at least one of user document files, user email, user music files, podcast files, computer status messages, and a profile database storing existing tag data. " so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff. lots of people on slashdot discussing this as well here http://slashdot.org/articles/07/07/14/043200.shtml[^] what does everyone else think of this stuff? I'm not a fan of software patents at all as I'm sick of seeing obvious inventions (including this one) patented and used as a club against smaller software shops. And further, I think using the private content of our personal computers to target us for ads is pretty awful as well.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Matt Newman
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Allen Anderson wrote:

        so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff.

        You mean like Google does?

        -Matt Newman

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Josh Smith

          Allen Anderson wrote:

          so they will can use our doc files, email, etc. to figure out what to push ads to us for? This is some seriously evil stuff.

          Gmail bases its advertisements on the content of your emails. That's nothing new, unfortunately. :sigh:

          :josh: My WPF Blog[^] The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it. - Michelangelo (1475-1564)

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Brady Kelly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Josh Smith wrote:

          Gmail bases its advertisements on the content of your emails. That's nothing new, unfortunately. :sigh:

          The difference is that Google uses your content stored on their system. It's kind of part of the price you pay for using Google. If I pay for for my own storage, and my own copy of an OS, I don't want anything else using it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups