Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Mirrors and prisoners

Mirrors and prisoners

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionhelplounge
45 Posts 19 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Fred_Smith

    Chadlling wrote:

    So the probability is 1 out of 3 before chatting with guard amd 1 out of 2 after chatting with the guard.

    So how come in the scenario of 100 such cells, only 1 out of 3 survive if they all have a 1 in 2 chance of doing so?

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan Neely
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    One in 2 of the A's and C's survive in each cell. None of the B's survive at all. Half of the A's and C's is 100/200, none of the B's is 0/100, for a net result of 100/300 surviving. Before the question you had: Person Chance of survival A 1/3 B 1/3 C 1/3 Total: 1 survivor per cell. After the question you have: Person Chance of survival A 1/2 B 0 C 1/2 Total: 1 survivor per cell.

    -- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Fred_Smith

      Chadlling wrote:

      So the probability is 1 out of 3 before chatting with guard amd 1 out of 2 after chatting with the guard.

      So how come in the scenario of 100 such cells, only 1 out of 3 survive if they all have a 1 in 2 chance of doing so?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chadlling
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Fred... multiplying the number of cells doesn't change the basic analysis. I think you are stretching the notion of "probability" outside its natural domain. Probability hinges on possible outcomes. What if the guard at 9:00 pm tells A, B, and C that 2 will die in the morning. but at midnight tells A he is going to be spared and tells B he is going to die and tells C nothing. Because probabilities hinge on possible outcomes, they will change for different people at different times. At 9:00 A/B/C all have a 1/3 chance of survival. At 12:00 the probability of survival is relevant to each person, dependent on how many possible outcomes are still viable. At midnight: A has a 100% probability of surviving B has a 0% chance of surviving C has a 33.3% chance of surviving You are thinking of probability as an absolute, when it is dependent on the individual, the timeline, and the availability of information. A and B know that C is going to die, but C doesn't, so his probablity (personal to him) is still 33.3%. If probability equals outcome/possible outcomes... there is no issue here. Because possible outcomes are entirely dependent on the flow of information. Let's say I pick one card out of a deck of cards, identify the card without showing it to you, and then putting it face down, while telling you that I will give you a million dollars if you tell me what card it is? What is the probability of winning the million? That is an unanswerable question, until you specify whose perspective you are talking about. Before you take your guess what is the probability that you will win. My perspective 1/52 Your perspective 1/52 God's perspective ?? There is no such thing as probability when talking about God because God operates outside of time, where there are no "possible outcomes" there is only THE outcome. You guess, but I haven't turned the card over. Your perspective still 1/52 My persoective ?? Probability no longer applies to me because the notion of possible outcomes has disapeared. Once I turn the card over, the notion of probability disappears for you too, since possible outcomes have also evaporated. It should not surprise you that probabilities change in accordance with information that changes the number of possible outcomes.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B barney_parker
        1. As said in another post, it reverses front and back, not left and right or up and down 2) since the answer is already decided, the actual probabilities are 1:1. What about the classics of... 1) which came first: The Chicken or the Egg? 2) If a tree falls in a forest, and no-one is there to hear it, does it make a sound? The answers are simple really.....
        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dalek Dave
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        If a woman is moaning and her husband isn't there to hear it, is it still his fault? Also eggs came first, eggs were around hundreds of millions of years before chickens.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S stevepqr

          I did A levels too - not maths though I didn't get it, strangely I went on to study Pure Maths at university! Statistics though isn't maths, its a black art practiced by wizards and magicians who follow the dark side. ;) Another thought - considering how difficult statistics is for most people to grasp its no suprise that it is a favorite of politicians and journalists, its a great tool for being able to make any point you like without ever being wrong!

          Apathy Rules - I suppose...

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dalek Dave
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          My son just got his GCSE results, Maths grade A, Further Maths grade A and Math and Stats grade C. We put the grade C down to Standard Deviation.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dalek Dave

            If a woman is moaning and her husband isn't there to hear it, is it still his fault? Also eggs came first, eggs were around hundreds of millions of years before chickens.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            barney_parker
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            it might not be his fault as such, but he still has some level of responsibility!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups