Microsoft free zone
-
Microsoft will never loose. More likely they will retarget their market and will stay in profit anyway. Sadly.
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
Never say never.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
-
Eric Goedhart wrote:
were all software will be replaced by open source software
An image comes to mind. It's dinner time at 150 Geek Lane. Standing on the street, one can hardly tell that this government funded housing district is even lived in, except for the flicker of tallow candles seen dimly through the windows. A lonely geek, sitting on his dinner table in front of a plastic "laptop for everyone", cranks the hand powered generator, fires up his OS browser, reads the news and cheers quietly. He has been part of the open source movement that, through his years of toil and labor of love, without any monetary compensation, without even meeting another fellow OS programmer (don't even think the thought "woman"), has finally defeated the demon corporate monster. All he thinks is "Europe is free!" as he takes another bite from his rice bowl, rice purchased on his meager government food coupons. Marc
Oh God, Marc. That is such dramatic bullshit. You should have taken up Mills & Boon writing :P
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
-
Never say never.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
Wise wise Paul... You're absolutely right...
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
-
Eric Goedhart wrote:
Amsterdam can be (it's up to the city counsel to decide) a Microsoft free zone
Isn't that a bit extreme? What happens if you live in Amsterdam and want to play on your XBox? Have the local wardens turned up and confiscated them before burning them in huge piles in the local city centre?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
"Sir, your Windows laptop will be returned to you* when you exit the Microsof free zone. Here is your ticket." * After being reformatted with Ubuntu Red Light District Beaver Edition v69.96.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
-
Hi, In the year 2012 Amsterdam can be (it's up to the city counsel to decide) a Microsoft free zone were all software will be replaced by open source software(Linux and Open Office etc.), a step that is previously taken by two other European cities (Munich and Vienna). In The Netherlands the usage of open software is promoted by the states economic department in an attempt to cut licences fees and it's expected that most state organisations will follow. Since this is becoming a European trend I think the impact will be huge for Microsoft and other companies such as Oracle. I was wondering if this is just taking place in Europe or it’s also taking place in other countries outside Europe? (and Microsoft is in the fight of losing a highly profitable market to open source software).
With friendly greetings,:) Eric Goedhart Interbritt
Markets change. Companies change. Business models change. Revenue streams change. We'll be fine.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
-
Markets change. Companies change. Business models change. Revenue streams change. We'll be fine.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
Paul Watson wrote:
Markets change. Companies change. Business models change. Revenue streams change.
Shift happens.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
Eric Goedhart wrote:
open software is promoted by the states economic department in an attempt to cut licences fees
I don't quite understand why they think cutting the costs is a good idea. If they don't pay license fee's the only way programmers will get paid is from support fees. If the end users don't need support or use someone else then the programmers don't get paid. If the programmers don't get paid then the industry disappears and all this wonderful open source code is maintained by n00b hobby programmers or ex professional programmers who are miffed at having to get different jobs which they don't enjoy as much. Or am I missing something here? Please note I'm not arguing about open source being bad ... just people wanting the programmers to not get paid.
originSH wrote:
If they don't pay license fee's the only way programmers will get paid is from support fees.
Just an idle thought on that... If i'm running the town Gov't, and i switch our IT budget from, say, 30% license fees paid an external entity to 30% more funds paid to internal support staff, then i've just increased my staff. And, consequently, my power. Muahahahahah...
----
I don't care what you consider witty, but at least I do not blather on posting nonsense like Jim Crafton.
-- Stringcheese, humbled by Crafton's ability to string together multiple sentences
-
Hi, In the year 2012 Amsterdam can be (it's up to the city counsel to decide) a Microsoft free zone were all software will be replaced by open source software(Linux and Open Office etc.), a step that is previously taken by two other European cities (Munich and Vienna). In The Netherlands the usage of open software is promoted by the states economic department in an attempt to cut licences fees and it's expected that most state organisations will follow. Since this is becoming a European trend I think the impact will be huge for Microsoft and other companies such as Oracle. I was wondering if this is just taking place in Europe or it’s also taking place in other countries outside Europe? (and Microsoft is in the fight of losing a highly profitable market to open source software).
With friendly greetings,:) Eric Goedhart Interbritt
What are they smokin' over there? :cool:
-
What are they smokin' over there? :cool:
-
Eric Goedhart wrote:
open software is promoted by the states economic department in an attempt to cut licences fees
I don't quite understand why they think cutting the costs is a good idea. If they don't pay license fee's the only way programmers will get paid is from support fees. If the end users don't need support or use someone else then the programmers don't get paid. If the programmers don't get paid then the industry disappears and all this wonderful open source code is maintained by n00b hobby programmers or ex professional programmers who are miffed at having to get different jobs which they don't enjoy as much. Or am I missing something here? Please note I'm not arguing about open source being bad ... just people wanting the programmers to not get paid.
-
originSH wrote:
If they don't pay license fee's the only way programmers will get paid is from support fees.
Just an idle thought on that... If i'm running the town Gov't, and i switch our IT budget from, say, 30% license fees paid an external entity to 30% more funds paid to internal support staff, then i've just increased my staff. And, consequently, my power. Muahahahahah...
----
I don't care what you consider witty, but at least I do not blather on posting nonsense like Jim Crafton.
-- Stringcheese, humbled by Crafton's ability to string together multiple sentences
-
Oh God, Marc. That is such dramatic bullshit. You should have taken up Mills & Boon writing :P
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
Paul Watson wrote:
Oh God, Marc. That is such dramatic bullsh*t.
Entertaining though, wasn't it? Marc
-
Paul Watson wrote:
Oh God, Marc. That is such dramatic bullsh*t.
Entertaining though, wasn't it? Marc
Always :)
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote:
Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
-
Eric Goedhart wrote:
open software is promoted by the states economic department in an attempt to cut licences fees
I don't quite understand why they think cutting the costs is a good idea. If they don't pay license fee's the only way programmers will get paid is from support fees. If the end users don't need support or use someone else then the programmers don't get paid. If the programmers don't get paid then the industry disappears and all this wonderful open source code is maintained by n00b hobby programmers or ex professional programmers who are miffed at having to get different jobs which they don't enjoy as much. Or am I missing something here? Please note I'm not arguing about open source being bad ... just people wanting the programmers to not get paid.
Same with teachers; everyone agrees that teachers are underpaid, but don't want their taxes to increase in order to pay the teachers better. "You don't want to pay too little for that muffler either."