Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Talking about the dollar...

Talking about the dollar...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
adobequestion
36 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    martin_hughes
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

    "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

    R L C I L 6 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M martin_hughes

      Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

      "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      R Giskard Reventlov
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      martin_hughes wrote:

      Gordon 'Fatty' Brown

      Priceless. :laugh:

      home articles for dummies

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M martin_hughes

        Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

        "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The true value of bad American sub-prime debt may never be fully known. Having said that, from the BBC [^] and [^] but this [^] is probably to be expected.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M martin_hughes

          Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

          "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Colin Angus Mackay
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          martin_hughes wrote:

          Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring?

          Well, if the dollar continues to slide the bad debt won't be worth much anyway. $100billion is less than half of what the NHS receives each year. The NHS gets somewhere in the region of $230billion (£110billion) every year. However, I expect that the US Bad debt problem is much higher than $100billion.


          Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer! Developer! Developer! 6 * Developer Day Scotland My website

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Colin Angus Mackay

            martin_hughes wrote:

            Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring?

            Well, if the dollar continues to slide the bad debt won't be worth much anyway. $100billion is less than half of what the NHS receives each year. The NHS gets somewhere in the region of $230billion (£110billion) every year. However, I expect that the US Bad debt problem is much higher than $100billion.


            Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer! Developer! Developer! 6 * Developer Day Scotland My website

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rob Graham
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

            owever, I expect that the US Bad debt problem is much higher than $100billion.

            How about $2 Trillion?[^]

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M martin_hughes

              Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

              "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ilion
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              martin_hughes wrote:

              It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

              Then again, one wonders if ever (and when) people in general will finally realize that these sorts of situations are not the result of "the market," but rather inevitably (and constantly) result from politicians using government coercion, both carrots and sticks, to interfere in "the market." The problem is not some bugaboo called “capitalism,” nor is it the ever popular “big business.”

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ilion

                martin_hughes wrote:

                It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

                Then again, one wonders if ever (and when) people in general will finally realize that these sorts of situations are not the result of "the market," but rather inevitably (and constantly) result from politicians using government coercion, both carrots and sticks, to interfere in "the market." The problem is not some bugaboo called “capitalism,” nor is it the ever popular “big business.”

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Patrick Etc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Ilíon wrote:

                Then again, one wonders if ever (and when) people in general will finally realize that these sorts of situations are not the result of "the market," but rather inevitably (and constantly) result from politicians using government coercion, both carrots and sticks, to interfere in "the market." The problem is not some bugaboo called “capitalism,” nor is it the ever popular “big business.”

                You're naive if you don't think companies interfere in government equally as much, to make markets more favorable to them, playing their own part in creating these types of situations.


                It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. - Albert Einstein

                7 S I 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • P Patrick Etc

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  Then again, one wonders if ever (and when) people in general will finally realize that these sorts of situations are not the result of "the market," but rather inevitably (and constantly) result from politicians using government coercion, both carrots and sticks, to interfere in "the market." The problem is not some bugaboo called “capitalism,” nor is it the ever popular “big business.”

                  You're naive if you don't think companies interfere in government equally as much, to make markets more favorable to them, playing their own part in creating these types of situations.


                  It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. - Albert Einstein

                  7 Offline
                  7 Offline
                  73Zeppelin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Don't entertain the crazies Patrick. When you do that they become more inclined to hang around.


                  "I know what you know and you don't know what I know."

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M martin_hughes

                    Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

                    "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    martin_hughes wrote:

                    Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring?

                    I dont know but NorthernRock is up to its ears in debt, about 30 bilion I heard. THisz was after it was stated it had 11 bilion of debt and needed 3 billlion off the Bank Of England. Aparently the BOE has been pouring money into it llike its a black hole. Of course the BOE is has been instructed to to this to avoid a credit crunch. If that happens, the UK economy, which like the US relies on borrowing ad spending to function is screwed. In the long run I think the US and UK have got irrespnsible lending laws that do nothing but allow masssive increases in house prices, which in themlselves dont enefit anyone except those retiring to somewhere a lot cheaper, provided they never want to come back. Which isnt many.

                    Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Patrick Etc

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      Then again, one wonders if ever (and when) people in general will finally realize that these sorts of situations are not the result of "the market," but rather inevitably (and constantly) result from politicians using government coercion, both carrots and sticks, to interfere in "the market." The problem is not some bugaboo called “capitalism,” nor is it the ever popular “big business.”

                      You're naive if you don't think companies interfere in government equally as much, to make markets more favorable to them, playing their own part in creating these types of situations.


                      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. - Albert Einstein

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      If government is working to advantage some company, then that would be the very 'government coercion' he mentioned. Either way, you have government interfering in the normal functioning of markets. The problem I have is that if corporations are forced to pay taxes, they should be able to have some kind of representation in government. That representation can only be expressed by some kind of lobbying of government officials. If we expect corporations to never seek redress from government, they should also never be expected to pay taxes.

                      The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                      L P I 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • M martin_hughes

                        Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring? Some analyst on the TV last week was talking about over one hundred billion in sub-prime mortgages alone (I can't remember who he was, so he might just have been talking hot air). It does make you wonder what's going to happen in the long run, and whether or not the big banks/lenders will finally realise that what Gordon 'Fatty' Brown called "the ingenuity of the markets", is actually a really bad move.

                        "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        leckey 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars. At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar. When it got to the 1-to-1 ratio I thought Bush might invade. -- modified at 15:57 Monday 19th November, 2007 I've had a few posts saying they are equal or CAD is worth more. I use http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic[^] I was reading the numbers backwards. My bad. -- modified at 15:59 Monday 19th November, 2007

                        http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                        7 C J S 4 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stan Shannon

                          If government is working to advantage some company, then that would be the very 'government coercion' he mentioned. Either way, you have government interfering in the normal functioning of markets. The problem I have is that if corporations are forced to pay taxes, they should be able to have some kind of representation in government. That representation can only be expressed by some kind of lobbying of government officials. If we expect corporations to never seek redress from government, they should also never be expected to pay taxes.

                          The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          leckey 0
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                          if corporations are forced to pay taxes, they should be able to have some kind of representation in government. That representation can only be expressed by some kind of lobbying of government officials. If we expect corporations to never seek redress from government, they should also never be expected to pay taxes.

                          Interesting thought. However, the company can contact their local representatives on the state and federal level to make their voices heard.

                          http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            martin_hughes wrote:

                            Has anyone read/seen/heard about how much more bad debt the US economy is habouring?

                            I dont know but NorthernRock is up to its ears in debt, about 30 bilion I heard. THisz was after it was stated it had 11 bilion of debt and needed 3 billlion off the Bank Of England. Aparently the BOE has been pouring money into it llike its a black hole. Of course the BOE is has been instructed to to this to avoid a credit crunch. If that happens, the UK economy, which like the US relies on borrowing ad spending to function is screwed. In the long run I think the US and UK have got irrespnsible lending laws that do nothing but allow masssive increases in house prices, which in themlselves dont enefit anyone except those retiring to somewhere a lot cheaper, provided they never want to come back. Which isnt many.

                            Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            martin_hughes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Eddie George, former Governor of the BoE, went on the record to state that he planned the utterly ridiculous rise in property prices in order to stave off recession - recession which was thoroughly due! But it's pathetic short-term thinking like this that screws everyone in the long run. The current housing market is a bubble about to burst - as Adam Smith said, if prices stay high for a long time and production doesn't ramp up to meet the demand, then there is something acting to keep those prices artificially high - and when it bursts just think how many people will be forced into negative equity.

                            "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

                            S L I 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • L leckey 0

                              I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars. At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar. When it got to the 1-to-1 ratio I thought Bush might invade. -- modified at 15:57 Monday 19th November, 2007 I've had a few posts saying they are equal or CAD is worth more. I use http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic[^] I was reading the numbers backwards. My bad. -- modified at 15:59 Monday 19th November, 2007

                              http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                              7 Offline
                              7 Offline
                              73Zeppelin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              leckey wrote:

                              At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar.

                              No it's not[^].


                              "I know what you know and you don't know what I know."

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L leckey 0

                                I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars. At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar. When it got to the 1-to-1 ratio I thought Bush might invade. -- modified at 15:57 Monday 19th November, 2007 I've had a few posts saying they are equal or CAD is worth more. I use http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic[^] I was reading the numbers backwards. My bad. -- modified at 15:59 Monday 19th November, 2007

                                http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris Meech
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                leckey wrote:

                                At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar.

                                Uhm, since about the beginning of October, the Canadian dollar has been worth more than the US dollar. At the rate things are going, the US dollar is approaching parity with the Canadian Tire dollar. ;)

                                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Donate to help Conquer Cancer[^]

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L leckey 0

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  if corporations are forced to pay taxes, they should be able to have some kind of representation in government. That representation can only be expressed by some kind of lobbying of government officials. If we expect corporations to never seek redress from government, they should also never be expected to pay taxes.

                                  Interesting thought. However, the company can contact their local representatives on the state and federal level to make their voices heard.

                                  http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Stan Shannon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  leckey wrote:

                                  However, the company can contact their local representatives on the state and federal level to make their voices heard.

                                  How? Certainly the people who manage the corporation can, as can the stock holders. But if the corporation itself is a separate tax paying entity, it has no real democratic representation aside from being able to redress issues with the government by means of lobbying. It certainly cannot vote, hence is taxed without representation. I think the answer is to simply not tax corporations (except, obviously, to whatever extent they use public transportation systems ,etc). It is certainly ok to tax the profits share holders make off the corporation, but since they can vote, they are represented.

                                  The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M martin_hughes

                                    Eddie George, former Governor of the BoE, went on the record to state that he planned the utterly ridiculous rise in property prices in order to stave off recession - recession which was thoroughly due! But it's pathetic short-term thinking like this that screws everyone in the long run. The current housing market is a bubble about to burst - as Adam Smith said, if prices stay high for a long time and production doesn't ramp up to meet the demand, then there is something acting to keep those prices artificially high - and when it bursts just think how many people will be forced into negative equity.

                                    "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    martin_hughes wrote:

                                    and when it bursts just think how many people will be forced into negative equity.

                                    Probably not as many as you think. Most people, such as myself, simply refinanced when rates got low. Others, made enormous profits off of existing property they sold. A relatively small number of people invested heavily in properties, and they will probably be badly burned. So, a lot of people greatly benefitted from the bubble, and those who get burned will mostly just take their losses and move on. But, all in all, as long as the markets don't panic, the US economy will shrug off this bubble just as it did the internet bubble of the '90s. Besides, if it were going to burst, it already would have. It shows every sign of deflating calmly enough. There are still booming real estate markets in the US.

                                    The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L leckey 0

                                      I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars. At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar. When it got to the 1-to-1 ratio I thought Bush might invade. -- modified at 15:57 Monday 19th November, 2007 I've had a few posts saying they are equal or CAD is worth more. I use http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic[^] I was reading the numbers backwards. My bad. -- modified at 15:59 Monday 19th November, 2007

                                      http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jim Warburton
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Canadian dollar is worth more, has been since late Sept. Low point was 94 cents, I think it is now about 98 cents.

                                      this thing looks like it was written by an epileptic ferret Dave Kreskowiak

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stan Shannon

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        and when it bursts just think how many people will be forced into negative equity.

                                        Probably not as many as you think. Most people, such as myself, simply refinanced when rates got low. Others, made enormous profits off of existing property they sold. A relatively small number of people invested heavily in properties, and they will probably be badly burned. So, a lot of people greatly benefitted from the bubble, and those who get burned will mostly just take their losses and move on. But, all in all, as long as the markets don't panic, the US economy will shrug off this bubble just as it did the internet bubble of the '90s. Besides, if it were going to burst, it already would have. It shows every sign of deflating calmly enough. There are still booming real estate markets in the US.

                                        The only conspiracies that concern me are the ones I am completely unaware of. By the time I find out about it, its probably a done deal. Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hypocrisy is no morality at all.

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        martin_hughes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        It's slightly different in the US, but it's going to hit Britain and hard. Here's an illustration of how crazy it is near to where I live: http://www.rightmove.co.uk/action/publicsite.PropertySearch[^] Yup, that's a $410,000 1 Bedroom flat in a not particularly great area!

                                        "On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L leckey 0

                                          I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars. At least the US dollar is worth more than the Canadian dollar. When it got to the 1-to-1 ratio I thought Bush might invade. -- modified at 15:57 Monday 19th November, 2007 I've had a few posts saying they are equal or CAD is worth more. I use http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic[^] I was reading the numbers backwards. My bad. -- modified at 15:59 Monday 19th November, 2007

                                          http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Sean Michael Murphy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          leckey wrote:

                                          I read that the US dollar is so bad that Heidi Klum refuses to be paid in US dollars.

                                          Bwahaha. A German national refuses to be paid in US dollars? I think this says more about Heidi Klum than it does the currency. What about the other non-American-30-somethingish-former-supermodels? Will they still take USD? Did you read this in the economics section of Cosmo? I need a citation. Let me know when Britney refuses US dollars. Only then will I worry. And, as a couple of people have already pointed out, the Canuck Buck is kicking ass and taking names. Up to $1.09USD, before retreating slightly. We're passing a hat around the office and once we have $25CAD (several million US), we're going to buy Mt. Rushmore and carve the faces of our national idols (Bob and Doug McKenzie, Wayne Greztky and Don Cherry) into it. Share and enjoy. Sean

                                          L C 7 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups