Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. "Advertising"

"Advertising"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondiscussion
6 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rei Miyasaka
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    People on CP need to quit flipping out every time they see an article that advertises a third-party product as part of its discussion. It's not ethics or morals or anything, it's just excessive political correctness. Seriously, if the product is of interest to us, and the article actually discusses code relevant to the product, no one should be complaining. I don't see anyone complaining when an article discusses a new Microsoft product. Why should it be any different for ISV products?

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rei Miyasaka

      People on CP need to quit flipping out every time they see an article that advertises a third-party product as part of its discussion. It's not ethics or morals or anything, it's just excessive political correctness. Seriously, if the product is of interest to us, and the article actually discusses code relevant to the product, no one should be complaining. I don't see anyone complaining when an article discusses a new Microsoft product. Why should it be any different for ISV products?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I think it depends. If I wanted to talk about how much I love Araxis Merge, I see no problem with that. If Araxis started to post here advertising their merge product, then I'd feel differently, even though the product is awesome.

      Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        I think it depends. If I wanted to talk about how much I love Araxis Merge, I see no problem with that. If Araxis started to post here advertising their merge product, then I'd feel differently, even though the product is awesome.

        Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rei Miyasaka
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It'd sorta depend on the substance of the article itself, wouldn't it? If Araxis was talking about how the product works and how to use it rather than just how great it is, is that just an advertisement or does it have at least some value as an article? Hence why I say I'm fine with it if it actually discusses code. On the contrary, if it's blatant advertising, I don't care if it came from Araxis or from one of its fans, it's still nothing but advertising. Think Apple zealots[^].

        A L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R Rei Miyasaka

          It'd sorta depend on the substance of the article itself, wouldn't it? If Araxis was talking about how the product works and how to use it rather than just how great it is, is that just an advertisement or does it have at least some value as an article? Hence why I say I'm fine with it if it actually discusses code. On the contrary, if it's blatant advertising, I don't care if it came from Araxis or from one of its fans, it's still nothing but advertising. Think Apple zealots[^].

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Anthony Mushrow
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Quality link. When you think about it for a moment, the weather at the altidute of the plane, is probably going to be different that the weather on the ground. And besides, who ever trusted the weather report anyway?

          My current favourite word is: PIE! Good ol' pie, it's been a while.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Anthony Mushrow

            Quality link. When you think about it for a moment, the weather at the altidute of the plane, is probably going to be different that the weather on the ground. And besides, who ever trusted the weather report anyway?

            My current favourite word is: PIE! Good ol' pie, it's been a while.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rei Miyasaka
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Check out the comments on the page too. It's full of pretentious geeks defending the iPod guy's humanity.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rei Miyasaka

              It'd sorta depend on the substance of the article itself, wouldn't it? If Araxis was talking about how the product works and how to use it rather than just how great it is, is that just an advertisement or does it have at least some value as an article? Hence why I say I'm fine with it if it actually discusses code. On the contrary, if it's blatant advertising, I don't care if it came from Araxis or from one of its fans, it's still nothing but advertising. Think Apple zealots[^].

              L Offline
              L Offline
              leppie
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              reinux wrote:

              Think Apple zealots[^].

              HAHA :) Now I am awake!

              xacc.ide
              IronScheme a R5RS-compliant Scheme on the DLR
              The rule of three: "The first time you notice something that might repeat, don't generalize it. The second time the situation occurs, develop in a similar fashion -- possibly even copy/paste -- but don't generalize yet. On the third time, look to generalize the approach."

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups