Vista memory usage
-
My problem is with step 2. I don't like waiting after every reboot. Does caching multiple gigabytes of stuff, instead of the most frequently accessed hundreds of megabytes, make it that much faster? I've disabled superfetch, and I've yet to feel that IE, Visual Studio, or Photoshop could load faster. They still get cached the standard way, so opening them a second time is faster than first-start.
Checkout XP's hibernate function. Resuming from hibernation is much faster that booting from scratch (ask any hedgehog).
Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk
-
Checkout XP's hibernate function. Resuming from hibernation is much faster that booting from scratch (ask any hedgehog).
Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk
I meant from things like WindowsUpdate. :) Without SuperFetch trying to load gigs of data at boot time, my system usually starts in 30 secs or so, which is fast enough for me.