Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Voting more than once for the same message

Voting more than once for the same message

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
csharpbeta-testingtoolsquestion
7 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Scott Dorman
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I thought we were only allowed one vote per message? I just voted twice for the same message, with no way to "undo" a vote. (I thought I saw that feature during the beta.)

    Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. —Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai


    [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

    L C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Scott Dorman

      I thought we were only allowed one vote per message? I just voted twice for the same message, with no way to "undo" a vote. (I thought I saw that feature during the beta.)

      Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. —Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai


      [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Luc Pattyn
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi Scott, I think this actually is a new feature; I just voted your message three times, first 5, then 1, now 3. It currently shows 3 with 1 vote. There has been a request to be able to modify one's own vote (in case an article does not sound as good on a second read as it did originally), and maybe Chris & Co found a way to implement exactly that. :)

      Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


      Happy 2008!


      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Luc Pattyn

        Hi Scott, I think this actually is a new feature; I just voted your message three times, first 5, then 1, now 3. It currently shows 3 with 1 vote. There has been a request to be able to modify one's own vote (in case an article does not sound as good on a second read as it did originally), and maybe Chris & Co found a way to implement exactly that. :)

        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


        Happy 2008!


        S Offline
        S Offline
        Scott Dorman
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I am pretty sure that this was more explicit than that in the beta version, but I could be mistaken. As long as it doesn't change the vote count it shouldn't cause problems.

        Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. —Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai


        [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Scott Dorman

          I thought we were only allowed one vote per message? I just voted twice for the same message, with no way to "undo" a vote. (I thought I saw that feature during the beta.)

          Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. —Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai


          [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Maunder
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          You can revote transparently.

          cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            You can revote transparently.

            cheers, Chris Maunder

            CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rajesh R Subramanian
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            If that's been done, then it's way too cool. Let me check it verify it by voting your message spam and then voting 5 again. ;p Just kidding.

            Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

            V 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rajesh R Subramanian

              If that's been done, then it's way too cool. Let me check it verify it by voting your message spam and then voting 5 again. ;p Just kidding.

              Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

              V Offline
              V Offline
              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

              voting your message spam

              Spam is an additional filter/flag right? You can vote 1 and also additionally report it as Spam/Abuse, as the message confirmation that popups up indicate.

              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
              Tech Gossips
              A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

                Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

                voting your message spam

                Spam is an additional filter/flag right? You can vote 1 and also additionally report it as Spam/Abuse, as the message confirmation that popups up indicate.

                Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
                Tech Gossips
                A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rajesh R Subramanian
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Nah, I was just joking. :)

                Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. ...formerly known as brahmma Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups