Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Object Isolation

Object Isolation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharpannouncementdatabasevisual-studiotools
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    sreejith ss nair
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi there, This query is with respect to the isolation of object in a collection. And like to hear couple of approaches those are feasible in such scenario. First, let me explain the problem which I am facing at this time. Our application has few rules (objects in concize) associated with few entities, those are editable for all currently active users (U1, U2). Assume that, we have 2 rules (R1, R2). Our requirement is no two users can edit, delete or modify a specific rule at same point of time. Eg: If U1 update R1 then U2 has to wait till U1 release R1. If U1 update R2 then U2 have provision to update R1 since R1 is not locked by any user. I hope you are clear about the requirement. Now, to ensure the above discussed functionality we implemented a method which uses Interlocked Class in threading namespace (VS.NET & C#). This approach in fact helps us while avoiding concurrent user access over a specific instance on a specific time using some flag value. But the problem is, it locks the entire rule collection (R1, R2) even thou there is no concurrent user. I presume, this is because of the way we model the class and is a collection (rule collection). Eg: If I have N rules in rule collection, it doesn’t mean that I need to lock all N rule objects in the rule collection. But I only need to lock specific rule (subset of rule collection), those are currently used by some logged users. And ensure all other non affected rules are free from lock. I did have a thought on the object level locking using .Net object locking mechanisms. But this is practically impossible to implement locking mechanism for each and every functionality. FYI: It is small product which has 54 projects (30 services, test projects, script) in C#.NET. And the product has its 70% of functionalities in place. So a major rework in object level is not practical at this moment since it has to go through lot of review and regression process. I hope you are clear with respect to the problem statement. Can you explain me which method would be feasible in such scenario ? How will i make sure only the object lock is available for the object which is currently i use and not other objects in the collection? And how will I ensure object level isolation than locking an entire collection? Do we have any proved patterns for this kind of problems? Thanks in advance. ;)

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S sreejith ss nair

      Hi there, This query is with respect to the isolation of object in a collection. And like to hear couple of approaches those are feasible in such scenario. First, let me explain the problem which I am facing at this time. Our application has few rules (objects in concize) associated with few entities, those are editable for all currently active users (U1, U2). Assume that, we have 2 rules (R1, R2). Our requirement is no two users can edit, delete or modify a specific rule at same point of time. Eg: If U1 update R1 then U2 has to wait till U1 release R1. If U1 update R2 then U2 have provision to update R1 since R1 is not locked by any user. I hope you are clear about the requirement. Now, to ensure the above discussed functionality we implemented a method which uses Interlocked Class in threading namespace (VS.NET & C#). This approach in fact helps us while avoiding concurrent user access over a specific instance on a specific time using some flag value. But the problem is, it locks the entire rule collection (R1, R2) even thou there is no concurrent user. I presume, this is because of the way we model the class and is a collection (rule collection). Eg: If I have N rules in rule collection, it doesn’t mean that I need to lock all N rule objects in the rule collection. But I only need to lock specific rule (subset of rule collection), those are currently used by some logged users. And ensure all other non affected rules are free from lock. I did have a thought on the object level locking using .Net object locking mechanisms. But this is practically impossible to implement locking mechanism for each and every functionality. FYI: It is small product which has 54 projects (30 services, test projects, script) in C#.NET. And the product has its 70% of functionalities in place. So a major rework in object level is not practical at this moment since it has to go through lot of review and regression process. I hope you are clear with respect to the problem statement. Can you explain me which method would be feasible in such scenario ? How will i make sure only the object lock is available for the object which is currently i use and not other objects in the collection? And how will I ensure object level isolation than locking an entire collection? Do we have any proved patterns for this kind of problems? Thanks in advance. ;)

      J Offline
      J Offline
      J a a n s
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Please check whether a Hashtable[^]Hashtable can help you. A Hashtable can support one writer and multiple readers concurrently. To support multiple writers, you can use a synchronized (thread-safe) wrapper for it. For details read the 'Thread Safety' part of the article.

      *jaans

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J J a a n s

        Please check whether a Hashtable[^]Hashtable can help you. A Hashtable can support one writer and multiple readers concurrently. To support multiple writers, you can use a synchronized (thread-safe) wrapper for it. For details read the 'Thread Safety' part of the article.

        *jaans

        S Offline
        S Offline
        sreejith ss nair
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It's too late to do a design change and looking forward for a wrapper kind of approach or attribute. Anyway thanks for your reply. :)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups