Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. WPF
  4. Porting a WPF App to Mac ...

Porting a WPF App to Mac ...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved WPF
csharpwpfdata-structuresquestionannouncement
16 Posts 4 Posters 46 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jammer 0

    Oh yeah, I'm coming from the angle that it would be a rewrite from the ground up basically ... a few resources could be carried over like XML lookup tables but that's about it I would imagine. haha!! - from appleinsider ... "C# is the microsoft spawn of satan java hack that is windows only. " This looks interesting ... http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:OSX[^]

    Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

    K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin McFarlane
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Yes, I was going to mention Mono but wasn't sure whether you wanted to stay with WPF or not. It will probably be easier to use Mono than learn Java or Objective C.

    Kevin

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jammer 0

      Hi All, This is a way off yet but its something I have to think about. My current project has a large enough potential Mac user base to make a mac version a viable effort. Have any of you here undertaken such a task? I'm not even sure what languages you can use to program for a Mac. I know that its a Unix based system which is significantly different platform and would require a stack of effort to learn but it would be worth it. I need to have a read up but has anyone got any useful info on this topic? Cheers,

      Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      You may want to look at this[^] book. The Mono .NET port is interesting, but seems to be a bit backend forwards about the different versions it develops with the development team rushing onto new features as soon as MS releases them without necessarily sorting out the issues with the existing versions.

      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

      My blog | My articles

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kevin McFarlane

        Yes, I was going to mention Mono but wasn't sure whether you wanted to stay with WPF or not. It will probably be easier to use Mono than learn Java or Objective C.

        Kevin

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jammer 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        indeedy!

        Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jammer 0

          Oh yeah, I'm coming from the angle that it would be a rewrite from the ground up basically ... a few resources could be carried over like XML lookup tables but that's about it I would imagine. haha!! - from appleinsider ... "C# is the microsoft spawn of satan java hack that is windows only. " This looks interesting ... http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:OSX[^]

          Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Pete OHanlon
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          "You take your stinkin' Mac ways away from these forums. We don' wan' no stinkin' Mac users."

          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

          My blog | My articles

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Pete OHanlon

            "You take your stinkin' Mac ways away from these forums. We don' wan' no stinkin' Mac users."

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            My blog | My articles

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jammer 0
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            heh heh ... nix ... pah!

            Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jammer 0

              heh heh ... nix ... pah!

              Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Pete OHanlon
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Jammer wrote:

              heh heh ... nix ... pah!

              And now you're bringing up nix? Dear god. Will the horror never end? :wtf:

              Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

              My blog | My articles

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Pete OHanlon

                Jammer wrote:

                heh heh ... nix ... pah!

                And now you're bringing up nix? Dear god. Will the horror never end? :wtf:

                Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                My blog | My articles

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jammer 0
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                not in my lifetime!

                Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jammer 0

                  Hi All, This is a way off yet but its something I have to think about. My current project has a large enough potential Mac user base to make a mac version a viable effort. Have any of you here undertaken such a task? I'm not even sure what languages you can use to program for a Mac. I know that its a Unix based system which is significantly different platform and would require a stack of effort to learn but it would be worth it. I need to have a read up but has anyone got any useful info on this topic? Cheers,

                  Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Patrick Klug
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Hi there, I am working on a project where the situation is the other way round. My background is a boxed software product which is available for both Mac and Windows. After we did a port originally (using GNUStep) we ended up rewriting the application from scratch using Windows native tools (C# and WPF). The reasons: - Windows and Mac users expect a very different user experience which requires two different user interfaces. - Both platforms have different strengths and what is easy on one platform can be very hard on the other. We try to keep our two products feature-identical but the implementation and usage of the features can greatly differ. - ObjectiveC is a dynamic language, C# is a statical typed language. The way you program in these languages is very different. - If you want a great product you need great developers. A Windows developer is likely not the best choice to create a 'good' Mac application and vice versa. Tools that work on both platforms have not the power of the native tools. (eg. Mono) As an example I want to refer to Microsoft Office. Office on Windows and Office on Mac has a VERY different user interface. I think Microsoft made the right choice by understanding that users on Mac and Windows have different expectations.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Patrick Klug

                    Hi there, I am working on a project where the situation is the other way round. My background is a boxed software product which is available for both Mac and Windows. After we did a port originally (using GNUStep) we ended up rewriting the application from scratch using Windows native tools (C# and WPF). The reasons: - Windows and Mac users expect a very different user experience which requires two different user interfaces. - Both platforms have different strengths and what is easy on one platform can be very hard on the other. We try to keep our two products feature-identical but the implementation and usage of the features can greatly differ. - ObjectiveC is a dynamic language, C# is a statical typed language. The way you program in these languages is very different. - If you want a great product you need great developers. A Windows developer is likely not the best choice to create a 'good' Mac application and vice versa. Tools that work on both platforms have not the power of the native tools. (eg. Mono) As an example I want to refer to Microsoft Office. Office on Windows and Office on Mac has a VERY different user interface. I think Microsoft made the right choice by understanding that users on Mac and Windows have different expectations.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jammer 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Very interesting post Pakl ... Just out of interest what boxed product is this background of your?

                    Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jammer 0

                      Very interesting post Pakl ... Just out of interest what boxed product is this background of your?

                      Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Patrick Klug
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      www.novamind.com[^]

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Patrick Klug

                        www.novamind.com[^]

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jammer 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Nice ... I'm going to check that out tomorrow ... looks like a cracking bit of software!

                        Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jammer 0

                          Nice ... I'm going to check that out tomorrow ... looks like a cracking bit of software!

                          Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Patrick Klug
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          getting better and better... we are still on our way from GDI+ to WPF. quite an interesting journey :-D

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Patrick Klug

                            getting better and better... we are still on our way from GDI+ to WPF. quite an interesting journey :-D

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jammer 0
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            I should say! There must be a lot of un-needed code to get GDI+ to do some of the WPF 'native' things.

                            Jammer Going where everyone here has gone before! :) My Blog

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups