Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Palinese

Palinese

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomquestion
20 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Sahir Shah

    also, please note, all my future posts in SB will be in Palinese.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rob Graham
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Sahir Shah wrote:

    all my future posts in SB will be in Palinese.

    Here's hoping that they will be few... ;P

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Graham

      Sahir Shah wrote:

      all my future posts in SB will be in Palinese.

      Here's hoping that they will be few... ;P

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Rob Graham wrote:

      Here's hoping that they will be few

      How will we tell them from Adnan's?

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Sahir Shah

        Discussed here[^] and also here[^]. I have become an instant fan of the language. Here is my first attempt at it : i am also a great fan of the scots, apart from the silly skirts they give us also the elixir of life and also having had three large ones i am inclined to say my diction is getting better, also, i am able to say with confidence that i am able to say british constitution but i am disappointed that my idiom does not soar as much as i would like to, so, let me get back to you after i have had some more. Pardon me if it sounds lame, also, with practice I should get better.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I think this time the Republicans really don't know how they could save the country from all the mistakes they made, so they decided this time to present two candidates who have no chance to be elected. Just to let the other side to have to deal with the mess. What a clever plan, it's working!

        If you kill a whale, you get Greenpeace and Jacques Cousteau on your back, but wipe out sardines and you get a canning subsidy! Fold with us! ¤ flickr

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          I think this time the Republicans really don't know how they could save the country from all the mistakes they made, so they decided this time to present two candidates who have no chance to be elected. Just to let the other side to have to deal with the mess. What a clever plan, it's working!

          If you kill a whale, you get Greenpeace and Jacques Cousteau on your back, but wipe out sardines and you get a canning subsidy! Fold with us! ¤ flickr

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rob Graham
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Ka?l wrote:

          What a clever plan,

          It's called the Shannon Gambit...

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rob Graham

            Ka?l wrote:

            What a clever plan,

            It's called the Shannon Gambit...

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Rob Graham wrote:

            the Shannon Gambit...

            Indeed... Step 1) Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction. Step 2) Rebuild around a core conservative base. Step 3) Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership. Step 4) Give the American people two clear cut and unequivocal choices: European style socialism which will no longer be something that can be denied after four years of Obama/Pelosi/Reed leadership, or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            B O B 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              Rob Graham wrote:

              the Shannon Gambit...

              Indeed... Step 1) Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction. Step 2) Rebuild around a core conservative base. Step 3) Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership. Step 4) Give the American people two clear cut and unequivocal choices: European style socialism which will no longer be something that can be denied after four years of Obama/Pelosi/Reed leadership, or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Brady Kelly
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

              Wow! I would actually agree with most of that if I were American.

              A SINGLE-PHOTON TURNSTILE, a device in which photons are emitted one at a time under controlled circumstances, has been created by a team of scientists from Stanford (US), Hamamatsu Photonics (Japan), and NTT (Japan). Essentially the researchers use the quantization of electrical conductance to produce a quantization of photon emission. They put together a quantum well (the frontier between two thin semiconductor layers) containing a single electron (other electrons are dissuaded from entering because of a "Coulomb blockade" effect) with a quantum well containing a lone (comparably Coulomb blockaded) hole, and then cycle the voltage across the whole stack of layers in such a way that the lone electron and lone hole meet, mate, and make a lone photon. The resulting device, which operates at mK temperatures, is typically a tiny post some 700 nm tall and with a diameter of 200-1000 nm. (J. Kim et al., Nature, 11 February 1999.)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Rob Graham wrote:

                the Shannon Gambit...

                Indeed... Step 1) Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction. Step 2) Rebuild around a core conservative base. Step 3) Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership. Step 4) Give the American people two clear cut and unequivocal choices: European style socialism which will no longer be something that can be denied after four years of Obama/Pelosi/Reed leadership, or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction.

                Does that include all neocons?

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Rebuild around a core conservative base.

                The bubbas? Or the plutocrats?

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership.

                You seem to think that can happen separately from the collapse of the USA.

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

                Which, of course, has to reject just about anything Jefferson said during his lifetime, except that the States should have the right to ignore Federal laws.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction.

                  Does that include all neocons?

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Rebuild around a core conservative base.

                  The bubbas? Or the plutocrats?

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership.

                  You seem to think that can happen separately from the collapse of the USA.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

                  Which, of course, has to reject just about anything Jefferson said during his lifetime, except that the States should have the right to ignore Federal laws.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Does that include all neocons?

                  That depends on the state of the rest of the world. If we need to continue to assert American exceptionalism around the world, then yes.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  The bubbas? Or the plutocrats?

                  bubbas preferably. The rino plutocrats would be expunged or reeducated.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  You seem to think that can happen separately from the collapse of the USA.

                  Actually, I don't. But, IMO, it already has collapsed.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  except that the States should have the right to ignore Federal laws.

                  Certainly all federal laws not supported by Jeffersonian constitutionalism.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Rob Graham wrote:

                    the Shannon Gambit...

                    Indeed... Step 1) Gut the republicans of all non-conservatives, forcing out the Bush/McCain faction. Step 2) Rebuild around a core conservative base. Step 3) Let the democrats collapse under the unrestrained radicalism of their party leadership. Step 4) Give the American people two clear cut and unequivocal choices: European style socialism which will no longer be something that can be denied after four years of Obama/Pelosi/Reed leadership, or unapologetic, pro-capitalism, pro-christian, pro-Jeffersonian traditional American conservatism.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    bulg
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    how about you cut off the pro christian part and explain jeffersonian to us young people?

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Sahir Shah

                      Discussed here[^] and also here[^]. I have become an instant fan of the language. Here is my first attempt at it : i am also a great fan of the scots, apart from the silly skirts they give us also the elixir of life and also having had three large ones i am inclined to say my diction is getting better, also, i am able to say with confidence that i am able to say british constitution but i am disappointed that my idiom does not soar as much as i would like to, so, let me get back to you after i have had some more. Pardon me if it sounds lame, also, with practice I should get better.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Did anyone else think of a small yappy dog?

                      Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                      B T L 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        Oakman wrote:

                        Does that include all neocons?

                        That depends on the state of the rest of the world. If we need to continue to assert American exceptionalism around the world, then yes.

                        Oakman wrote:

                        The bubbas? Or the plutocrats?

                        bubbas preferably. The rino plutocrats would be expunged or reeducated.

                        Oakman wrote:

                        You seem to think that can happen separately from the collapse of the USA.

                        Actually, I don't. But, IMO, it already has collapsed.

                        Oakman wrote:

                        except that the States should have the right to ignore Federal laws.

                        Certainly all federal laws not supported by Jeffersonian constitutionalism.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        If we need to continue to assert American exceptionalism around the world, then yes.

                        what the hell does that mean?

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        The rino plutocrats would be expunged or reeducated

                        Going to hire some Cambodians to do the reducation?

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        Actually, I don't. But, IMO, it already has collapsed.

                        Amazing. You are "Jeffersonian" but you reject Jefferson. You are pro-Christian but you don't attend church and I suspect you are agnostic. You are a patriot who actively roots for the downfall of his country.

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        Certainly all federal laws not supported by Jeffersonian constitutionalism

                        Neither federal law nor the Constitution will matter in the slightest if you are right and the USA has collapsed.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B bulg

                          how about you cut off the pro christian part and explain jeffersonian to us young people?

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Brady Kelly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Understand the pro-Christian part as, "Love thy neighbour", not as, "stone the adulterer", and you should be able to understand without adult supervision.

                          il

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Did anyone else think of a small yappy dog?

                            Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Brady Kelly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            The subject line? No, not until you mentioned it :laugh::laugh: With big eyes? ;P

                            il

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Brady Kelly

                              Understand the pro-Christian part as, "Love thy neighbour", not as, "stone the adulterer", and you should be able to understand without adult supervision.

                              il

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Brady Kelly wrote:

                              Understand the pro-Christian part as, "Love thy neighbour", not as, "stone the adulterer", and you should be able to understand without adult supervision.

                              Brady, with all due respect, Stan means something much closer to the establishment of a state religion, and it'll be stone the adulterer and the abortion doctor.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Did anyone else think of a small yappy dog?

                                Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                TimK
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Trollslayer wrote:

                                Did anyone else think of a small yappy dog?

                                Yep, Palin certainly does remind me of a small yappy dog. A small yappy dog would make a great vice president. Probably over-qualified for the job though.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Did anyone else think of a small yappy dog?

                                  Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Yay! I upset him/her/it! :-D

                                  Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Yay! I upset him/her/it! :-D

                                    Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Conrad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Trollslayer wrote:

                                    I upset him/her/it!

                                    :laugh: I just ignore univoters :rolleyes:

                                    "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Paul Conrad

                                      Trollslayer wrote:

                                      I upset him/her/it!

                                      :laugh: I just ignore univoters :rolleyes:

                                      "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      bulg
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      :) I univoted trollslayer 'cause it underscored its value (that 1-voters are easily bruised)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups