Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. How far the Republican party has descended

How far the Republican party has descended

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
34 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Yep - that was low. Surely you're not suggesting that the Democrats are above such BS?

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Please. We are butting heads with the kings of low. Who gives a shit? Stop grieving over insults to the left, they deserve it. That and a lot more.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      I think you have that just bass ackwards.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      I think you have that just bass ackwards.

      Since I am asking an even-handed question, it makes no difference. You can, of course, play schoolyard games about "he started it!" if you wish, but I thought you might see the futility of that approach.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Yep - that was low. Surely you're not suggesting that the Democrats are above such BS?

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Mike Mullikin wrote:

        Yep - that was low. Surely you're not suggesting that the Democrats are above such BS?

        Congratulations, Mike. You have pissed off the left wing and the right wing with one post. You must be doing something right. :rose:

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Mike Mullikin wrote:

          Yep - that was low. Surely you're not suggesting that the Democrats are above such BS?

          Congratulations, Mike. You have pissed off the left wing and the right wing with one post. You must be doing something right. :rose:

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Oakman wrote:

          Congratulations, Mike. You have pissed off the left wing and the right wing with one post.

          Then my work here is done. Time to sit back and watch the last debate. :laugh:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O oilFactotum

            :laugh: Poor Stan. I'm afraid you will really be foaming at the mouth in November.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            oilFactotum wrote:

            I'm afraid you will really be foaming at the mouth in November.

            Nonsense. A radically leftist government (the kind guys like you would support) suits my purposes far better than would another milquetoast republican administration paying lipservice to conservative principles. It is a perfect time for conservatives to abandon the field to the left, fall back and regroup.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              I think you have that just bass ackwards.

              Since I am asking an even-handed question, it makes no difference. You can, of course, play schoolyard games about "he started it!" if you wish, but I thought you might see the futility of that approach.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Oakman wrote:

              but I thought you might see the futility of that approach.

              I don't think it is futile at all. It is precisely what we should be doing. Fuck the moral high ground.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Oakman wrote:

                but I thought you might see the futility of that approach.

                I don't think it is futile at all. It is precisely what we should be doing. Fuck the moral high ground.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                I don't think it is futile at all.

                Most nine year-olds don't.

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                f*** the moral high ground.

                Behaving like an adult has nothing to do with any kind of high ground - though with your strong pro-Christian stands, it's difficult to see why you are so adamantly in favor of taking the low road - but rather it has to do with make sane choices that increase the chances of survival and growth for you and yours.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  I don't think it is futile at all.

                  Most nine year-olds don't.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  f*** the moral high ground.

                  Behaving like an adult has nothing to do with any kind of high ground - though with your strong pro-Christian stands, it's difficult to see why you are so adamantly in favor of taking the low road - but rather it has to do with make sane choices that increase the chances of survival and growth for you and yours.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Behaving like an adult has nothing to do with any kind of high ground - though with your strong pro-Christian stands, it's difficult to see why you are so adamantly in favor of taking the low road - but rather it has to do with make sane choices that increase the chances of survival and growth for you and yours.

                  It matters not one whit how adult you try to act. When you are being drug down and getting the crap beat out of you by hoards of nine year olds, you have no choice but to fight back in kind. Lieing in a bloody heap proud of your maturity while your society is given over to the nine year olds is hardly a solution.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Doug Goulden

                    Defending not even close, just amazed at the indignation that Dems will heap on the Republicans while being just as nasty and intellectually dishonest. I don't think either party has the high ground here.

                    Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    oilFactotum
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Doug Goulden wrote:

                    just amazed at the indignation that Dems will heap on the Republicans

                    I don't know what you are talking about. Indignant over "Waterboard Obama"? It's no skin off my nose. I'm more than happy to see McCain and the Republicans go down in flames with their self-destructive negative campaign.

                    Doug Goulden wrote:

                    while being just as nasty and intellectually dishonest.

                    You can choose to believe that, of course, but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                    O S 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stan Shannon

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Behaving like an adult has nothing to do with any kind of high ground - though with your strong pro-Christian stands, it's difficult to see why you are so adamantly in favor of taking the low road - but rather it has to do with make sane choices that increase the chances of survival and growth for you and yours.

                      It matters not one whit how adult you try to act. When you are being drug down and getting the crap beat out of you by hoards of nine year olds, you have no choice but to fight back in kind. Lieing in a bloody heap proud of your maturity while your society is given over to the nine year olds is hardly a solution.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      When you are being drug down and getting the crap beat out of you by hoards of nine year olds

                      Assuming that all of your opponets are as childish as you are is a great way of being send to your room without supper.

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      you have no choice but to fight back in kind

                      The dumbest thing you can do is fight back 'in kind.' Never, ever, let your opponent(s) determine the level of combat. If you decide that you need to fight, then you fight to win, using all necessary force - no more, and no less.

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Lieing in a bloody heap proud of your maturity while your society is given over to the nine year olds is hardly a solution.

                      Exactly the kind of imaginative defense a nine-year old would offer to excuse his behavior. I didn't buy it from my kids, and I'm certainly not going to get swept up in your fantasies, either.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        oilFactotum wrote:

                        I'm afraid you will really be foaming at the mouth in November.

                        Nonsense. A radically leftist government (the kind guys like you would support) suits my purposes far better than would another milquetoast republican administration paying lipservice to conservative principles. It is a perfect time for conservatives to abandon the field to the left, fall back and regroup.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        oilFactotum
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        A radically leftist government

                        You really are going to be disappointed then. If Obama is elected you aren't going to see a radically leftist government. We have most definitely had a radical government for the last 8 years and, with any luck, we'll have a president Obama who will put that to an end.

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        fall back and regroup.

                        Amen to that. The R's very much need to re-embrace conservative principles.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O oilFactotum

                          Doug Goulden wrote:

                          just amazed at the indignation that Dems will heap on the Republicans

                          I don't know what you are talking about. Indignant over "Waterboard Obama"? It's no skin off my nose. I'm more than happy to see McCain and the Republicans go down in flames with their self-destructive negative campaign.

                          Doug Goulden wrote:

                          while being just as nasty and intellectually dishonest.

                          You can choose to believe that, of course, but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                          O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Oakman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          oilFactotum wrote:

                          but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                          I would bet my bottom dollar that a great majority of Americans would vote "none of the above," if they could. Note that the nation's opinion of Congress, under both Republican and Democratic leadership has been the one thing consistently lower than Bush's approval rating.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • O Oakman

                            oilFactotum wrote:

                            but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                            I would bet my bottom dollar that a great majority of Americans would vote "none of the above," if they could. Note that the nation's opinion of Congress, under both Republican and Democratic leadership has been the one thing consistently lower than Bush's approval rating.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            oilFactotum
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Oakman wrote:

                            I would bet my bottom dollar that a great majority of Americans would vote "none of the above,

                            Maybe, maybe not. I am curious as to what conclusion(s) you think you could draw from that, if it were true.

                            Oakman wrote:

                            Note that the nation's opinion of Congress, under both Republican and Democratic leadership has been the one thing consistently lower than Bush's approval rating.

                            Not sure how that relates to the public's opinion on the relative nastiness of the two campaigns.

                            O 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O oilFactotum

                              Oakman wrote:

                              I would bet my bottom dollar that a great majority of Americans would vote "none of the above,

                              Maybe, maybe not. I am curious as to what conclusion(s) you think you could draw from that, if it were true.

                              Oakman wrote:

                              Note that the nation's opinion of Congress, under both Republican and Democratic leadership has been the one thing consistently lower than Bush's approval rating.

                              Not sure how that relates to the public's opinion on the relative nastiness of the two campaigns.

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              oilFactotum wrote:

                              Not sure how that relates to the public's opinion on the relative nastiness of the two campaigns.

                              I sit corrected. I leapt to the concept of the relative attractiveness of the two parties, which, I agree, was not your point.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Oakman

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                When you are being drug down and getting the crap beat out of you by hoards of nine year olds

                                Assuming that all of your opponets are as childish as you are is a great way of being send to your room without supper.

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                you have no choice but to fight back in kind

                                The dumbest thing you can do is fight back 'in kind.' Never, ever, let your opponent(s) determine the level of combat. If you decide that you need to fight, then you fight to win, using all necessary force - no more, and no less.

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                Lieing in a bloody heap proud of your maturity while your society is given over to the nine year olds is hardly a solution.

                                Exactly the kind of imaginative defense a nine-year old would offer to excuse his behavior. I didn't buy it from my kids, and I'm certainly not going to get swept up in your fantasies, either.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Oakman wrote:

                                The dumbest thing you can do is fight back 'in kind.' Never, ever, let your opponent(s) determine the level of combat. If you decide that you need to fight, then you fight to win, using all necessary force - no more, and no less.

                                No, the dumbest thing you can do in a fight is allow your opponent to dictate the terms of how it will be fought, to tell you how you are allowed to fight, what tactics and weapons you can use. To win a a fight you must be able to turn your opponent's greatest strengths against him.

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O oilFactotum

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  A radically leftist government

                                  You really are going to be disappointed then. If Obama is elected you aren't going to see a radically leftist government. We have most definitely had a radical government for the last 8 years and, with any luck, we'll have a president Obama who will put that to an end.

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  fall back and regroup.

                                  Amen to that. The R's very much need to re-embrace conservative principles.

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Stan Shannon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  oilFactotum wrote:

                                  You really are going to be disappointed then. If Obama is elected you aren't going to see a radically leftist government. We have most definitely had a radical government for the last 8 years and, with any luck, we'll have a president Obama who will put that to an end.

                                  We'll see. Obama has two choices. He can continue Bush's basic policies (which will leave those such as yourself feeling betrayed) or he can implement the kinds of change people like you want (which will leave everyone else who voted for him feeeling betrayed). If he changes Bush policies and bad things happen he loses. I'm certain that, in any case, you will see nothing Obama does as being radical because you are from the same basic America hating background that he is. The question is will the rest of the center right American electorate who put him in power feel the same way?

                                  oilFactotum wrote:

                                  The R's very much need to re-embrace conservative principles.

                                  I agree completely. The republicans deserved to be taught a lesson, to be knocked back to a core base of pro-free market, pro-christian, pro-jeffersonian core, and begin rebuilding from there for as long as it takes for the American people to become tired of being turned into a European social welfare state.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O oilFactotum

                                    Doug Goulden wrote:

                                    just amazed at the indignation that Dems will heap on the Republicans

                                    I don't know what you are talking about. Indignant over "Waterboard Obama"? It's no skin off my nose. I'm more than happy to see McCain and the Republicans go down in flames with their self-destructive negative campaign.

                                    Doug Goulden wrote:

                                    while being just as nasty and intellectually dishonest.

                                    You can choose to believe that, of course, but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    oilFactotum wrote:

                                    but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                                    They feel the same way about the treatment of Palin. The democrats and their media allies make every effort to destroy conservative politicians by every underhanded misinformation methodology in their bag of dirty tricks. Well, fine, keep it up. Bring it on, you'll get what you deserve in the end...

                                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                    O 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Stan Shannon

                                      oilFactotum wrote:

                                      but most Americans seem to disagree with you.

                                      They feel the same way about the treatment of Palin. The democrats and their media allies make every effort to destroy conservative politicians by every underhanded misinformation methodology in their bag of dirty tricks. Well, fine, keep it up. Bring it on, you'll get what you deserve in the end...

                                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      oilFactotum
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      They feel the same way about the treatment of Palin.

                                      And they also feel she is not prepared to be President and most people don't like her(high negative ratings).

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      The democrats and their media allies...

                                      Evil Democrats...left wing media...blah, blah, blah... :rolleyes:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stan Shannon

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        You really are going to be disappointed then. If Obama is elected you aren't going to see a radically leftist government. We have most definitely had a radical government for the last 8 years and, with any luck, we'll have a president Obama who will put that to an end.

                                        We'll see. Obama has two choices. He can continue Bush's basic policies (which will leave those such as yourself feeling betrayed) or he can implement the kinds of change people like you want (which will leave everyone else who voted for him feeeling betrayed). If he changes Bush policies and bad things happen he loses. I'm certain that, in any case, you will see nothing Obama does as being radical because you are from the same basic America hating background that he is. The question is will the rest of the center right American electorate who put him in power feel the same way?

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        The R's very much need to re-embrace conservative principles.

                                        I agree completely. The republicans deserved to be taught a lesson, to be knocked back to a core base of pro-free market, pro-christian, pro-jeffersonian core, and begin rebuilding from there for as long as it takes for the American people to become tired of being turned into a European social welfare state.

                                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                        O Offline
                                        O Offline
                                        oilFactotum
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        Obama has two choices

                                        It's amazing how your binary view of the world blinds you. How bizarre that you think the only choice available to the next president are the Bush Doctrine and communism - what a barren world view.

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        because you are from the same basic America hating background that he is.

                                        :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • O oilFactotum

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          Obama has two choices

                                          It's amazing how your binary view of the world blinds you. How bizarre that you think the only choice available to the next president are the Bush Doctrine and communism - what a barren world view.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          because you are from the same basic America hating background that he is.

                                          :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stan Shannon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          We'll see...

                                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups