Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Split WPF/WCF/WF forum?

Split WPF/WCF/WF forum?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
csharpwpfwcfalgorithmsquestion
5 Posts 4 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jon Rista
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I've been looking for WF threads to see what kinds of questions ppl have been asking, and what the solutions were. I dug through like 10 pages or so of WPF questions and finally gave up. Tried searching, but there are so many variations of the terms for 'WF' and a wide variety of subterms, that scanning through all WF related posts would be a real hassle. Could we split off the WF and maybe WCF forums so that the questions don't get drowned in the deluge of WPF? Thanks.

    realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jon Rista

      I've been looking for WF threads to see what kinds of questions ppl have been asking, and what the solutions were. I dug through like 10 pages or so of WPF questions and finally gave up. Tried searching, but there are so many variations of the terms for 'WF' and a wide variety of subterms, that scanning through all WF related posts would be a real hassle. Could we split off the WF and maybe WCF forums so that the questions don't get drowned in the deluge of WPF? Thanks.

      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOP
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I agree. No useful purpose in combining the three when they really have nothing to do with each other (other than the last letter of their acronym).

      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • realJSOPR realJSOP

        I agree. No useful purpose in combining the three when they really have nothing to do with each other (other than the last letter of their acronym).

        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
        -----
        "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

        J Offline
        J Offline
        J4amieC
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        other than the last letter of their acronym

        And the first /pedant

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J J4amieC

          John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

          other than the last letter of their acronym

          And the first /pedant

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Luc Pattyn
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          that's at least 66% in common, a rather large correlation then. :)

          Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


          Love, happiness and fewer bugs for 2009!


          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Luc Pattyn

            that's at least 66% in common, a rather large correlation then. :)

            Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


            Love, happiness and fewer bugs for 2009!


            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jon Rista
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I still really think there neeeds to be a split. The volume of WPF threads in there is growing, and will most likely continue to grow, faster than all the rest. It doesn't make sense to have all three together anyway, although I could understand it if there just wern't enough posts to warrant separate forums. At the very least, break off WCF/WF into its own forum, and let WPF grow in its own.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups