Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Very proud

Very proud

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
18 Posts 7 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mycroft Holmes

    It's really weird wanering in here and seeing all the greyed out message removed signs. I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post. I assume Chris has implemented some sort of garbage collector that automatically picks up Troll posts. Although I would have thought stopping them from actually hitting the site may have been feasible it waould not have acted as a warning for others. Wheres my tin hat

    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

    T Offline
    T Offline
    Tim Craig
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Mycroft Holmes wrote:

    can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post.

    I'm not convinced it takes 13. I'm guessing the poster who said it was based it on a post having 12 1's and then he voted to remove and it went away. But both 1 and remove votes score as 1 so there weren't necessarily 12 prior remove votes.

    "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Tim Craig

      Mycroft Holmes wrote:

      can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post.

      I'm not convinced it takes 13. I'm guessing the poster who said it was based it on a post having 12 1's and then he voted to remove and it went away. But both 1 and remove votes score as 1 so there weren't necessarily 12 prior remove votes.

      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mycroft Holmes
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      He seems to be back so it can't be an auto thingy

      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ilion

        Maxxx_ wrote:

        What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

        What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll. It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

        Maxxx_ wrote:

        What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

        And yet, I am the "troll." Amusing, isn't it? Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

        Maxxx_ wrote:

        Illion (sp?)

        One "L"

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Ilíon wrote:

        rational criticism

        :rolleyes:

        Ilíon wrote:

        their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs

        But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

        Bob Emmett

        I 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Ilíon wrote:

          rational criticism

          :rolleyes:

          Ilíon wrote:

          their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs

          But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

          Bob Emmett

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ilion
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Bob Emmett wrote:

          But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

          This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ilion

            Bob Emmett wrote:

            But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

            This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Ilíon wrote:

            This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

            If it were not true, I would not have written it.

            Bob Emmett

            I 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Ilíon wrote:

              This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

              If it were not true, I would not have written it.

              Bob Emmett

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ilion
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Bob Emmett wrote:

              If it were not true, I would not have written it.

              Pshaw![^] It's *always* you "community" types who do that, and then whine (and, of course, lie) when you get it served back to you. You "community" fellows are bullies *and* sissies. And it's just so unfair, isn't it, that I'm neither impressed nor intimidated.

              modified on Friday, January 16, 2009 4:16 AM

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                I'm not, personally; if I choose not to read or respond to a troll, I would prefer it to be my choice and not the choice of others (certainly not the choice of a small number of others) Sure - if the post breached guidelines (apparently, for example, using the word 'test*cle' in the lounge is frowned upon) then removal is fine and dandy. But allowing a small number of people to make the decision that a post (esp. in the Soapbox) is simply not to be read by me is just censorship. What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al. Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                I Offline
                I Offline
                Ilion
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Maxxx_ wrote:

                Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                They have that option, already, in two forms: 1) self-control [some maturity required] 2) some script written by one of "the comminity" to filter out any post made by posters they think beneith their exalted dignity [has the unfortunate side effect of allowing others to still read the posts if they wish]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Ilion

                  Maxxx_ wrote:

                  What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

                  What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll. It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

                  Maxxx_ wrote:

                  What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

                  And yet, I am the "troll." Amusing, isn't it? Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

                  Maxxx_ wrote:

                  Illion (sp?)

                  One "L"

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Christian Graus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll

                  Yes, you are.

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

                  You mean name calling when people try to discuss your endless stream of links ?

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

                  A persecution complex is not surprising, I mean, how else do you respond to a community that is united in disregarding you ?

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mycroft Holmes

                    It's really weird wanering in here and seeing all the greyed out message removed signs. I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post. I assume Chris has implemented some sort of garbage collector that automatically picks up Troll posts. Although I would have thought stopping them from actually hitting the site may have been feasible it waould not have acted as a warning for others. Wheres my tin hat

                    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                    I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians

                    I think that may have changed. I suspect the votes may be weighted now so that Golds and Platinums can shut the door on him more quickly. At any rate, there have been times when I have been 6th or 7th in and his message was grayed when I refreshed the page.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      I'm not, personally; if I choose not to read or respond to a troll, I would prefer it to be my choice and not the choice of others (certainly not the choice of a small number of others) Sure - if the post breached guidelines (apparently, for example, using the word 'test*cle' in the lounge is frowned upon) then removal is fine and dandy. But allowing a small number of people to make the decision that a post (esp. in the Soapbox) is simply not to be read by me is just censorship. What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al. Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                      If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      whatever you say, Troy.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups