Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Change

Change

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
83 Posts 17 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Bassam Saoud

    Oakman wrote:

    Yep. We didn't have any of that fancy healthcare either. Doctors were barbers and drugists sold snake oil to cure whatever ailed you.

    funny like always Oakman :laugh: :laugh:

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    Bassam Saoud wrote:

    funny like always Oakman

    Thanks for the laughter, but I hope you understand that I was telling the absolute truth. In fact, it wasn't until about 1900 that hospitals started operating in the manner in which they do now, including adopting standards of antisepsis. Indeed, until 1920, the majority of surgery (by now conducted by M.D.'s) happened in the patient's home. X| What Stan doesn't seem to understand is that the chief cost associated with illness before the 1920's was not the cost of medical care, but rather the fact that sick people couldn't work and didn't get paid. A 1919 study conducted by the State of Illinois reported that lost wages due to sickness were four times larger than the medical expenditures associated with treating the illness. So "sickness insurance," (pretty much the same thing as disability insurance these days) was what people bought, not "health insurance."

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Oakman wrote:

      Stan is terrified by the thought of actual freedom.

      Which would be what - anal sex? Abortions?

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #75

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      Which would be what - anal sex? Abortions?

      That's hardly an exhausive list of what is none of the state's business, even though, once again, you fixate on anal sex. (Did you have a really traumatic shoreleave in San Francisco?) What I find most curious is that you seem to wish with all your heart for unrestrained capitalism with the no checks, bounds, or ameleration by the state - at the same time praying for a government that will insure you will never confront an idea or act that you personally disapprove of.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CSS_Shadow

        dan neely wrote:

        No more than in the standard Rep/Dem switcharoo we do almost every 4 to 8 years.

        And do you have any idea what the standard is?

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #76

        Are you old enough to remember Clinton - Bush 2? Or Bush1 - Clinton?

        Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Dan Neely

          Are you old enough to remember Clinton - Bush 2? Or Bush1 - Clinton?

          Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CSS_Shadow
          wrote on last edited by
          #77

          Yes.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B BoneSoft

            I wish that people weren't so interested in oppressing, or failing that, killing other people. And I wish governments didn't feel a need to subvert and squable with other governments. Why national leaders can't just sit down and talk like adults is beyond me. But when confronted with that reality, you can fight back or lay down and die. But then aggressors usually see self defense aimed at them as aggression and round and round we go. I think it will change just enough so that they can say they changed without really making any meaningful difference. But then, I could be wrong, Obama inexplicably seems to still be under the illusion that he can be friends with Ahmadenajad. Which he can of course, if he nukes Israel (even if it wiped Palistine off the map as well). And nothing this goofy bastard could do would surprise me at this point. I'd personally like to see us stand firm on stamping out any little pockets of militant terrorists we can find, but I'd also like to see us be as responsible and cooperative as possible with all nations. I don't want to be hated by the rest of the world, or all the lefties in this country. But I'd rather be hated than dead or forced into oppression. I honestly wish good fortune and happy long lives on everybody on the planet, I just wish they all felt the same way, and plenty of people obviously don't.

            Bassam Saoud wrote:

            Lots of politicians in my country are changing teams if you know what I mean

            Not completely sure I do. Could you explain?


            Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Synaptrik
            wrote on last edited by
            #78

            BoneSoft wrote:

            Why national leaders can't just sit down and talk like adults is beyond me.

            Human nature. Take our soapbox for example. If its a person that the group dislikes, content is irrelevant. Government heads are no different. Like the joke Dan posted. Heads of state are a lot like siblings squabbling. To focused on their own wants. And, if they don't like the opposition, content becomes irrelevant.

            This statement is false

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mike Gaskey

              Bassam Saoud wrote:

              Why do you say that?

              because .... instead of boostrapping, we now simply whine.

              Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #79

              Mike Gaskey wrote:

              we now simply whine.

              I would have thought you'd be more of a beer man, myself

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Bassam Saoud wrote:

                What if you dont have money?

                Thats what christian charity is for.

                Bassam Saoud wrote:

                Why do you pay taxes for?

                The general welfare.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                A Offline
                A Offline
                Al Beback
                wrote on last edited by
                #80

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                christian charity

                How much do you contribute to that? What if christian charity decides that it will only help me if I'm christian?

                ShamWow

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Sure, Christian, Castro had nothing to do with it

                  Yeah, Cuba would be in exactly the same state of poverty if it was allowed to import medicines, etc. The US has nothing to do with it.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Canada is nothing but a welfare stat

                  Canada has real welfare, as do most other countries. That this makes them failed right now, is a question for debate.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  The Chinese were intelligent enough to accept that they needed a new economic model if not a social one

                  That was kind of my point - failure depends on your criteria. I'd hate to live in China, I don't pretend that their communist system is one that equates to freedom or equity. But, is that failure, or is their economic success, a guage of success in general ? Depends on your POV

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Al Beback
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #81

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  Yeah, Cuba would be in exactly the same state of poverty if it was allowed to import medicines, etc. The US has nothing to do with it.

                  Actually Christian, Cuba is free to import its goods from any country in the world, except the US. It merely uses the US embargo as another excuse to keep its people poor, oppressed, and in fear. It's proof positive that unilateral sanctions don't actually work -- ruthless dictators will always find ways to stay in power. 50 years without elections! X|

                  ShamWow

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Al Beback

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    christian charity

                    How much do you contribute to that? What if christian charity decides that it will only help me if I'm christian?

                    ShamWow

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stan Shannon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #82

                    Al Beback wrote:

                    How much do you contribute to that?

                    Thats my business, but I'm in good standing at my church at least on that issue.

                    Al Beback wrote:

                    What if christian charity decides that it will only help me if I'm christian?

                    Well that wouldn't be very Christian. But it would not at all be inappropriate for the charity to be predicated on certain behavioral expectations.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Synaptrik

                      BoneSoft wrote:

                      Why national leaders can't just sit down and talk like adults is beyond me.

                      Human nature. Take our soapbox for example. If its a person that the group dislikes, content is irrelevant. Government heads are no different. Like the joke Dan posted. Heads of state are a lot like siblings squabbling. To focused on their own wants. And, if they don't like the opposition, content becomes irrelevant.

                      This statement is false

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      BoneSoft
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #83

                      Yes. But you would think that of those that rise to the highest levels of government in a nation would at least be adults, if not more adult than most. Course you'd be wrong, but it makes no sense.


                      Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups