Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Canada judge: Man not responsible for beheading

Canada judge: Man not responsible for beheading

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comjsonannouncement
30 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Gary Kirkham

    If you were offered the responsibility to render judgment on this man based solely on what you read in the media, would you have any problem accepting that responsibility?

    Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ilion
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Gary Kirkham wrote:

    If you were offered the responsibility to render judgment on this man based solely on what you read in the media, would you have any problem accepting that responsibility?

    What a profoundly unserious attitude you display.

    G S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      For what it's worth to the reader, here is the blogger Lawrence Auster's very sensible comments on this.[^] Consider, especially, "Laura's" comment:

      Can you imagine how betrayed the McLean family must feel? Truthfully, I can't imagine it. Where can one go to absorb such an experience, to put oneself in their shoes? Perhaps to Greek tragedy with its fixation on the outer and inner dimensions of violence. Think of it. Every year, perhaps for the rest of their lives, these people must appear before bureaucrats to relive their son's death and to meet face-to-face the man who ate his eyes. It is they who have been banished from human society to an island, an earthly hell.

      Absorb this truth: "It is they who have been banished from human society to an island, an earthly hell."

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      I take it you're very much into honour killings?

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S soap brain

        I take it you're very much into honour killings?

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

        I take it you're very much into honour killings?

        You're so pointless. What is it like to be you?

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

          I take it you're very much into honour killings?

          You're so pointless. What is it like to be you?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          soap brain
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          I mean, apparently you belong to the 'barbaric' school of discipline. And if a wife dishonours her husband, why should he not be allowed his revenge? If his daughter dishonours her father, why is he not allowed his revenge?

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S soap brain

            I mean, apparently you belong to the 'barbaric' school of discipline. And if a wife dishonours her husband, why should he not be allowed his revenge? If his daughter dishonours her father, why is he not allowed his revenge?

            I Offline
            I Offline
            Ilion
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

            I mean,

            No, what you mean is that hold yourself free to ignore what I have said while criticising me for what I have not said (nor implied). I am not answerable for your strawmen. Now, go away until you can become a rational ... and honest ... human being.

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Ilion

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              I mean,

              No, what you mean is that hold yourself free to ignore what I have said while criticising me for what I have not said (nor implied). I am not answerable for your strawmen. Now, go away until you can become a rational ... and honest ... human being.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              I can only conclude that you experienced a particularly austere childhood - who else would hold such spite, such vindictiveness, in their heart?

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ilion

                Gary Kirkham wrote:

                If you were offered the responsibility to render judgment on this man based solely on what you read in the media, would you have any problem accepting that responsibility?

                What a profoundly unserious attitude you display.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gary Kirkham
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

                Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                I 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S soap brain

                  I can only conclude that you experienced a particularly austere childhood - who else would hold such spite, such vindictiveness, in their heart?

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  Oakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                  I can only conclude that you experienced a particularly austere childh

                  He used to get beat up by bullies and have to hide in the sewers to escape them - he told us so, himself. Now that he's grown up, he is a bully - socially and politically.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Oakman

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    I can only conclude that you experienced a particularly austere childh

                    He used to get beat up by bullies and have to hide in the sewers to escape them - he told us so, himself. Now that he's grown up, he is a bully - socially and politically.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    soap brain
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Ah, yes, that explains many things - his obnoxious personality, and why sewers are so dirty. X|

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      Gary Kirkham wrote:

                      If you were offered the responsibility to render judgment on this man based solely on what you read in the media, would you have any problem accepting that responsibility?

                      What a profoundly unserious attitude you display.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

                      This statement is false

                      I 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Ilion

                        Mike Gaskey wrote:

                        some a-hole like this kills one of my family members and goes to a hospital instead of doing life (or death) in a prison, I'm obligated.

                        Canadians, in the main, no longer seem to be normal human beings. Mark Steyn: Excusing the men who ran away[^] The new film ‘Polytechnique’ sidesteps the old norm of ‘women and children first’ Gamil Gharbi, nee Marc Lépine, massacred a class-room of women and the official liberal/feminist narative is that "Marc Lépine embodies the murderous misogynist rage that is inherent in all men." This (the facts of the event and the subsequent narative) is why Steyn's favorite nickname for Canada is "the unmanned Dominion." edit: "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi. The Canadian Morlocks have been at it longer, or at least more successfully, than ours.

                        modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 10:49 PM

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        Ilíon wrote:

                        ‘women and children first’

                        A feminist/liberal sentiment, if ever I encountered one. :)

                        Ilíon wrote:

                        "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi.

                        But only the other day you agreed that the following described a future liberal society: Above these an immense tutelary power is elevated, which alone takes charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is absolute, detailed, regular, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if, like that, it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

                        Bob Emmett

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Ilion

                          Mike Gaskey wrote:

                          some a-hole like this kills one of my family members and goes to a hospital instead of doing life (or death) in a prison, I'm obligated.

                          Canadians, in the main, no longer seem to be normal human beings. Mark Steyn: Excusing the men who ran away[^] The new film ‘Polytechnique’ sidesteps the old norm of ‘women and children first’ Gamil Gharbi, nee Marc Lépine, massacred a class-room of women and the official liberal/feminist narative is that "Marc Lépine embodies the murderous misogynist rage that is inherent in all men." This (the facts of the event and the subsequent narative) is why Steyn's favorite nickname for Canada is "the unmanned Dominion." edit: "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi. The Canadian Morlocks have been at it longer, or at least more successfully, than ours.

                          modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 10:49 PM

                          7 Offline
                          7 Offline
                          73Zeppelin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

                          I O 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • 7 73Zeppelin

                            Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

                            I Offline
                            I Offline
                            Ilion
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            73Zeppelin wrote:

                            Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that ...

                            Good "argument!" I am in awe at your reasoning skills.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Ilíon wrote:

                              ‘women and children first’

                              A feminist/liberal sentiment, if ever I encountered one. :)

                              Ilíon wrote:

                              "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi.

                              But only the other day you agreed that the following described a future liberal society: Above these an immense tutelary power is elevated, which alone takes charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is absolute, detailed, regular, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if, like that, it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

                              Bob Emmett

                              I Offline
                              I Offline
                              Ilion
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Bob Emmett wrote:

                              How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

                              Is there a contradiction? Where is it, I'm not seeing it. And, if you were willing to think about it, rather than trying to play "Gotcha," you'd also see that there is no contradiction. Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism. So long as the "citizens" remain childlike in relation to The State, the velvet gloves can be left on. The point of happy-face despotism is not the good of the "citizens" but to make them incapable of revolt: if "citizens" are massacered here and there, that's a minor non-issue, so long as the "citizens" remain unfocused and unorganized, and child-like or Eloi-like.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G Gary Kirkham

                                You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

                                Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Ilion
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Gary Kirkham wrote:

                                You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

                                You pathetic fool, to imagine that "So! Have you stopped beating your wife?" should be taken seriously.

                                G 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 7 73Zeppelin

                                  Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  73Zeppelin wrote:

                                  I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn.

                                  Steyn preaches fear and hatred, just like Bin Laden. Naturally Troy would worship at his feet.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Synaptrik

                                    Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

                                    This statement is false

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Ilion
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Synaptrik wrote:

                                    Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

                                    Either: the posting-system is incorectly telling me that you'd directed that at me or: you amusingly imagine that you'd said something meaningful to me.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • I Ilion

                                      Gary Kirkham wrote:

                                      You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

                                      You pathetic fool, to imagine that "So! Have you stopped beating your wife?" should be taken seriously.

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Gary Kirkham
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      But yet I could have answered the same question without being a fool or a hypocrite.

                                      Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Ilion

                                        Bob Emmett wrote:

                                        How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

                                        Is there a contradiction? Where is it, I'm not seeing it. And, if you were willing to think about it, rather than trying to play "Gotcha," you'd also see that there is no contradiction. Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism. So long as the "citizens" remain childlike in relation to The State, the velvet gloves can be left on. The point of happy-face despotism is not the good of the "citizens" but to make them incapable of revolt: if "citizens" are massacered here and there, that's a minor non-issue, so long as the "citizens" remain unfocused and unorganized, and child-like or Eloi-like.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Ilíon wrote:

                                        rather than trying to play "Gotcha"

                                        :rolleyes: Dystopia 1. Wells' story is a ripping yarn satirising the British class system as at the end of the 19th century. The Eloi were the rulers; they are the evolution of indolence, where all is provided by the labour of others. The Morlocks were the ruled; they are the evolution of the providers, the miners, the sweat-shop workers, the servants below stairs, the machine operators. Out of sight, out of mind. The Morelocks did not reduce the Eloi to their 'childlike' state, they merely took advantage of it. And they don't farm the Eloi, they hunt. Dystopia 2. De Tocqueville posited that democracy could create citizens who related to the state as children do to a parent. Of course it could (so, too, could a charismatic despot). The difference is that in a democracy, you get to change your parents.

                                        Ilíon wrote:

                                        Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism.

                                        The USA and Canada have not yet renounced democracy for despotism, happy-faced or otherwise, and the "citizens" are actually citizens. Whether the majority of the citizens of the USA and Canada are resigned, docile, and 'childlike', you are in a better position to say than I. Childlike Innocent, trusting, simple, naive, credulous, artless, ingenuous, guileless, unfeigned, trustful. It really does depend on the child. :)

                                        Bob Emmett

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups