Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Canada judge: Man not responsible for beheading

Canada judge: Man not responsible for beheading

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comjsonannouncement
30 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Ilion

    Gary Kirkham wrote:

    If you were offered the responsibility to render judgment on this man based solely on what you read in the media, would you have any problem accepting that responsibility?

    What a profoundly unserious attitude you display.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Synaptrik
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

    This statement is false

    I 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      Mike Gaskey wrote:

      some a-hole like this kills one of my family members and goes to a hospital instead of doing life (or death) in a prison, I'm obligated.

      Canadians, in the main, no longer seem to be normal human beings. Mark Steyn: Excusing the men who ran away[^] The new film ‘Polytechnique’ sidesteps the old norm of ‘women and children first’ Gamil Gharbi, nee Marc Lépine, massacred a class-room of women and the official liberal/feminist narative is that "Marc Lépine embodies the murderous misogynist rage that is inherent in all men." This (the facts of the event and the subsequent narative) is why Steyn's favorite nickname for Canada is "the unmanned Dominion." edit: "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi. The Canadian Morlocks have been at it longer, or at least more successfully, than ours.

      modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 10:49 PM

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Ilíon wrote:

      ‘women and children first’

      A feminist/liberal sentiment, if ever I encountered one. :)

      Ilíon wrote:

      "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi.

      But only the other day you agreed that the following described a future liberal society: Above these an immense tutelary power is elevated, which alone takes charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is absolute, detailed, regular, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if, like that, it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

      Bob Emmett

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ilion

        Mike Gaskey wrote:

        some a-hole like this kills one of my family members and goes to a hospital instead of doing life (or death) in a prison, I'm obligated.

        Canadians, in the main, no longer seem to be normal human beings. Mark Steyn: Excusing the men who ran away[^] The new film ‘Polytechnique’ sidesteps the old norm of ‘women and children first’ Gamil Gharbi, nee Marc Lépine, massacred a class-room of women and the official liberal/feminist narative is that "Marc Lépine embodies the murderous misogynist rage that is inherent in all men." This (the facts of the event and the subsequent narative) is why Steyn's favorite nickname for Canada is "the unmanned Dominion." edit: "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi. The Canadian Morlocks have been at it longer, or at least more successfully, than ours.

        modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 10:49 PM

        7 Offline
        7 Offline
        73Zeppelin
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

        I O 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • 7 73Zeppelin

          Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ilion
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          73Zeppelin wrote:

          Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that ...

          Good "argument!" I am in awe at your reasoning skills.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Ilíon wrote:

            ‘women and children first’

            A feminist/liberal sentiment, if ever I encountered one. :)

            Ilíon wrote:

            "Liberalism," having gained control of most of the institutions of society, trains us up to be Eloi.

            But only the other day you agreed that the following described a future liberal society: Above these an immense tutelary power is elevated, which alone takes charge of assuring their enjoyments and watching over their fate. It is absolute, detailed, regular, far-seeing, and mild. It would resemble paternal power if, like that, it had for its object to prepare men for manhood; but on the contrary, it seeks only to keep them fixed irrevocably in childhood; How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

            Bob Emmett

            I Offline
            I Offline
            Ilion
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Bob Emmett wrote:

            How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

            Is there a contradiction? Where is it, I'm not seeing it. And, if you were willing to think about it, rather than trying to play "Gotcha," you'd also see that there is no contradiction. Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism. So long as the "citizens" remain childlike in relation to The State, the velvet gloves can be left on. The point of happy-face despotism is not the good of the "citizens" but to make them incapable of revolt: if "citizens" are massacered here and there, that's a minor non-issue, so long as the "citizens" remain unfocused and unorganized, and child-like or Eloi-like.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Gary Kirkham

              You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

              Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ilion
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Gary Kirkham wrote:

              You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

              You pathetic fool, to imagine that "So! Have you stopped beating your wife?" should be taken seriously.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 7 73Zeppelin

                Steyn's nothing but a talking head who writes sensational trash so that he can con his supporters into allowing him to eek out a living. The reason he needs to eek out a living is because he's incapable of earning his own keep. I knew you were naive, but I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn. That's pretty low even by your standards. The most amusing thing about you is how dependent you are on other people's opinions.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                73Zeppelin wrote:

                I didn't realize you were naive enough to grovel at the feet of Steyn.

                Steyn preaches fear and hatred, just like Bin Laden. Naturally Troy would worship at his feet.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Synaptrik

                  Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

                  This statement is false

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ilion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Synaptrik wrote:

                  Criticism without content. Tis a wonder of society that your main contribution is empty retribution.

                  Either: the posting-system is incorectly telling me that you'd directed that at me or: you amusingly imagine that you'd said something meaningful to me.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ilion

                    Gary Kirkham wrote:

                    You are wise not to answer the question. One answer would prove you to be a fool, the other a hypocrite.

                    You pathetic fool, to imagine that "So! Have you stopped beating your wife?" should be taken seriously.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gary Kirkham
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    But yet I could have answered the same question without being a fool or a hypocrite.

                    Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                      How do you reconcile the two dystopian futures?

                      Is there a contradiction? Where is it, I'm not seeing it. And, if you were willing to think about it, rather than trying to play "Gotcha," you'd also see that there is no contradiction. Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism. So long as the "citizens" remain childlike in relation to The State, the velvet gloves can be left on. The point of happy-face despotism is not the good of the "citizens" but to make them incapable of revolt: if "citizens" are massacered here and there, that's a minor non-issue, so long as the "citizens" remain unfocused and unorganized, and child-like or Eloi-like.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      rather than trying to play "Gotcha"

                      :rolleyes: Dystopia 1. Wells' story is a ripping yarn satirising the British class system as at the end of the 19th century. The Eloi were the rulers; they are the evolution of indolence, where all is provided by the labour of others. The Morlocks were the ruled; they are the evolution of the providers, the miners, the sweat-shop workers, the servants below stairs, the machine operators. Out of sight, out of mind. The Morelocks did not reduce the Eloi to their 'childlike' state, they merely took advantage of it. And they don't farm the Eloi, they hunt. Dystopia 2. De Tocqueville posited that democracy could create citizens who related to the state as children do to a parent. Of course it could (so, too, could a charismatic despot). The difference is that in a democracy, you get to change your parents.

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      Training up the "citizens" to be Eloi is part of the mildness of happy-face despotism.

                      The USA and Canada have not yet renounced democracy for despotism, happy-faced or otherwise, and the "citizens" are actually citizens. Whether the majority of the citizens of the USA and Canada are resigned, docile, and 'childlike', you are in a better position to say than I. Childlike Innocent, trusting, simple, naive, credulous, artless, ingenuous, guileless, unfeigned, trustful. It really does depend on the child. :)

                      Bob Emmett

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups