Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. A fool-proof plan for economic recovery: [modified]

A fool-proof plan for economic recovery: [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
106 Posts 11 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Synaptrik

    Chris Austin wrote:

    Can we level the playing field with tariffs?

    Can we do so without tariffs? We're competing with countries that have tariffs. This isn't a level playing field. Case in point, the EU just added some for bio diesels against us.

    This statement is false

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    The United States have a number of tariffs in place. As does the European Union. As do many other countries around the world. That is fact.

    Synaptrik wrote:

    Can we do so without tariffs?

    Only by being super-efficient in your manufacturing and re-introducing industry for products that you presently need to import. By that I mean, there is no one answer but you will need to put into practice the best traditions of systems analysis to assess probable solutions industry by industry, company by company, it can't be left to government. But if you want government to act in a particular way, remember the concept of an eye for an eye. Retaliation will happen, in fact, it is guaranteed, and a right royal mess with ensue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Synaptrik

      Would you agree that we do need a balance of reasonable tariffs though? I guess what I'm trying to get at is: Is it possible we've lowered the bar too far when calling something protectionist?

      This statement is false

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #84

      It is best to do away with all forms of protectionism. Tariffs, reasonable or not, is most likely to be matched by overseas countries.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Thank you John. You have confirmed what I said in a thread below.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #85

        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

        Thank you John. You have confirmed what I said in a thread below.

        You continue to talk in terms of academics, I am afraid. In the real world, no country does not already have tariffs in place, and few if any countries have as few or as forgiving tariffs as does the US. Hardly any if we exclude the other English-speaking countries. Meanwhile we have repressive regimes which allow no free market within their borders, produce their goods using indentured labor in a manner resembling Nazi Germany's use of concentration camp inhabitants, spew deadly chemicals into the air without any scrubbing and export products that should be covered in blood to show what has been spent instead of money in their manufacture. And somehow, you talk as if the two are equals. :confused:

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rob Graham

          Oakman wrote:

          He was, and you are, absolutely correct.

          So, does that mean that instead of tariffs, what we really need is national health care to level the playing field?

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #86

          Rob Graham wrote:

          does that mean that instead of tariffs, what we really need is national health care to level the playing field?

          Why can't we have both? It's not like the US economy is just a little bit in trouble.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rob Graham

            Oakman wrote:

            He was, and you are, absolutely correct.

            So, does that mean that instead of tariffs, what we really need is national health care to level the playing field?

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #87

            A National Health Service based upon the British model will still costs employers money but nowhere near as much as it costs for your employers for their present healthcare costs.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Rob Graham wrote:

              does that mean that instead of tariffs, what we really need is national health care to level the playing field?

              Why can't we have both? It's not like the US economy is just a little bit in trouble.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rob Graham
              wrote on last edited by
              #88

              I am inclined to believe that tarrifs will hurt rather than help. What would you place tarrifs on? We already have tarrifs on things that seem to hurt rather than help (Sugar, ethanol, etc.)

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                Thank you John. You have confirmed what I said in a thread below.

                You continue to talk in terms of academics, I am afraid. In the real world, no country does not already have tariffs in place, and few if any countries have as few or as forgiving tariffs as does the US. Hardly any if we exclude the other English-speaking countries. Meanwhile we have repressive regimes which allow no free market within their borders, produce their goods using indentured labor in a manner resembling Nazi Germany's use of concentration camp inhabitants, spew deadly chemicals into the air without any scrubbing and export products that should be covered in blood to show what has been spent instead of money in their manufacture. And somehow, you talk as if the two are equals. :confused:

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #89

                Nothing wrong with introducing some academic aspect to our discussions. Sometimes I agree they can be a distraction. But, as a thought, one of the main causes of this debacle could be attributed to what was/is still an incessant march of capitalism's industrial globalization policies. And because of that, within the company free trade will happen, but not necessarily between the country of origin and destination where other considerations are relevant. So how should global entities be treated? What should their responsibilities be? How should governments treat them? Many questions, but no easy answer in what is another aspect of the troubles.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rob Graham

                  I am inclined to believe that tarrifs will hurt rather than help. What would you place tarrifs on? We already have tarrifs on things that seem to hurt rather than help (Sugar, ethanol, etc.)

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  Oakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #90

                  Rob Graham wrote:

                  What would you place tarrifs on? We already have tarrifs on things that seem to hurt rather than help (Sugar, ethanol, etc.)

                  How about steel, toys, clothing - just off the top of my head.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Nothing wrong with introducing some academic aspect to our discussions. Sometimes I agree they can be a distraction. But, as a thought, one of the main causes of this debacle could be attributed to what was/is still an incessant march of capitalism's industrial globalization policies. And because of that, within the company free trade will happen, but not necessarily between the country of origin and destination where other considerations are relevant. So how should global entities be treated? What should their responsibilities be? How should governments treat them? Many questions, but no easy answer in what is another aspect of the troubles.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #91

                    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                    So how should global entities be treated

                    Tax their entire income in every country in which they do business.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                      So how should global entities be treated

                      Tax their entire income in every country in which they do business.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #92

                      That might possibly be a way of making certain imports more expensive all without the formal use of tariffs. But there is a problem, differentiating between home made and imported where the product make/model is identical in every respect as this company, as many do, operates a production line in the USA as it does in, say, the Far East producing identical stuff. If you were to insist that taxation for foreign made items to be different from home brew items, who is going to pay the company to redesign either the home grown stuff or the imported stuff, after all, you must have a way of telling them apart. Certainly you will need to advertise what is essentially the same product at two or more different prices. It could possibly be disastrous.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Oakman

                        Rob Graham wrote:

                        What would you place tarrifs on? We already have tarrifs on things that seem to hurt rather than help (Sugar, ethanol, etc.)

                        How about steel, toys, clothing - just off the top of my head.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rob Graham
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #93

                        Steel- Do you really think the mills in Pittsburgh or Birmingham will start back up? Is there anyone willing and able to work in them? Does either city want the pollution back? Do we really want the energy cost? I would propose instead a tax subsidy for recycling steel in country (today it's cheaper to ship it to Japan for re-manufacture). Instead of taxing it's importation, lets make internal recycling competitive. Toys - were we ever a player in that business? Clothing - The return of the double-knits? The NYC sewing sweatshops. Who besides (mostly illegal) immigrants worked in the clothing (not fabric manufacture) side of things?

                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stan Shannon

                          Rob Graham wrote:

                          You are assuming that the cause of the collapse will be war. I think it is much more likely that worldwide famine and epidemics will be the cause. The current economic problems raise the likelihood of a new pandemic, as hunger and starvation increase in places like China. Given the rapidity with which disease is spread in today's world, it is unlikely that the next great pandemic will be confined to the continent it begins on.

                          I agree with that. But war, famine and pestilence usually all go together. I simply do not believe that it is possible to effectively manage an international economy with anything less than an international government. And the only alternative to an international economy is no economy at all which means no real government at all. Just about any thing could trigger the implosion of massively overpopulated urban centers in the modern world. I think human civilization could be reduced to cannibalism in a matter of weeks.

                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                          modified on Saturday, March 7, 2009 2:06 PM

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rob Graham
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #94

                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                          Just about any thing could trigger the implosion of massively overpopulated urban centers in the modern world. I think human civilization could be reduced to cannibalism in a matter of weeks.

                          Like a really big solar flare that mucks up the electrical grid for months instead of just days.

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Rob Graham

                            Stan Shannon wrote:

                            Just about any thing could trigger the implosion of massively overpopulated urban centers in the modern world. I think human civilization could be reduced to cannibalism in a matter of weeks.

                            Like a really big solar flare that mucks up the electrical grid for months instead of just days.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            Oakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #95

                            Rob Graham wrote:

                            Like a really big solar flare that mucks up the electrical grid for months instead of just days.

                            Never thought of that - I keep waiting for the Big One in California. But, hell, if Krakatoa was to blow its top again, we could end up with one year of world-wide bad harvest.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Rob Graham

                              Steel- Do you really think the mills in Pittsburgh or Birmingham will start back up? Is there anyone willing and able to work in them? Does either city want the pollution back? Do we really want the energy cost? I would propose instead a tax subsidy for recycling steel in country (today it's cheaper to ship it to Japan for re-manufacture). Instead of taxing it's importation, lets make internal recycling competitive. Toys - were we ever a player in that business? Clothing - The return of the double-knits? The NYC sewing sweatshops. Who besides (mostly illegal) immigrants worked in the clothing (not fabric manufacture) side of things?

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #96

                              You could, I think, end up proving that the best thing we could do would be to eliminate any stateside production of anything.

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              Is there anyone willing and able to work in them

                              I caught this on the news this afternoon: A medium-sized city announced a single opening for a school janitor's position. There were 700 applicants in 24 hours. No, that's not nearly as tough as a steelworker's job, but it doesn't pay as well either.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                That might possibly be a way of making certain imports more expensive all without the formal use of tariffs. But there is a problem, differentiating between home made and imported where the product make/model is identical in every respect as this company, as many do, operates a production line in the USA as it does in, say, the Far East producing identical stuff. If you were to insist that taxation for foreign made items to be different from home brew items, who is going to pay the company to redesign either the home grown stuff or the imported stuff, after all, you must have a way of telling them apart. Certainly you will need to advertise what is essentially the same product at two or more different prices. It could possibly be disastrous.

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Oakman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #97

                                Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                If you were to insist that taxation for foreign made items to be different from home brew items, who is going to pay the company to redesign either the home grown stuff or the imported stuff, after all, you must have a way of telling them apart. Certainly you will need to advertise what is essentially the same product at two or more different prices.

                                Seems like that would be the company's problem. However, for the what seems like the millionth time, I am not in favor of tariffs between trading partners who have a free market, including in labor, at home, and who are not irresponsible when it comes to the environment or product safety. If theses mthologically identical products are manufactured under the same social circumstances, there is no need for taxing the entry of either product into either country. If one of them has been produced by 12 year olds chained to the production line 12 hours a day and the other produced by willing and well-paid adults, then we should impose a tariff, not only to protect our own businesses, but to eliminate at least some of the profit in slaveholding.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O Oakman

                                  Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                  If you were to insist that taxation for foreign made items to be different from home brew items, who is going to pay the company to redesign either the home grown stuff or the imported stuff, after all, you must have a way of telling them apart. Certainly you will need to advertise what is essentially the same product at two or more different prices.

                                  Seems like that would be the company's problem. However, for the what seems like the millionth time, I am not in favor of tariffs between trading partners who have a free market, including in labor, at home, and who are not irresponsible when it comes to the environment or product safety. If theses mthologically identical products are manufactured under the same social circumstances, there is no need for taxing the entry of either product into either country. If one of them has been produced by 12 year olds chained to the production line 12 hours a day and the other produced by willing and well-paid adults, then we should impose a tariff, not only to protect our own businesses, but to eliminate at least some of the profit in slaveholding.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #98

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  However, for the what seems like the millionth time...

                                  Sorry.

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  slaveholding

                                  What generally is public opinion in the USA on this subject. How much influence does this public opinion, including any adverse publicity, have on such retailers. How ethical is the United States towards these impoverished foreign based workers. There was a time when our prestigious Marks & Spencer's sold items of clothing made in such sweatshops. But no more after the company was humiliated on national TV.

                                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O Oakman

                                    You could, I think, end up proving that the best thing we could do would be to eliminate any stateside production of anything.

                                    Rob Graham wrote:

                                    Is there anyone willing and able to work in them

                                    I caught this on the news this afternoon: A medium-sized city announced a single opening for a school janitor's position. There were 700 applicants in 24 hours. No, that's not nearly as tough as a steelworker's job, but it doesn't pay as well either.

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rob Graham
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #99

                                    Oakman wrote:

                                    You could, I think, end up proving that the best thing we could do would be to eliminate any stateside production of anything

                                    Well, for all practical purposes, we have just about eliminated most manual labor jobs outside of construction. Which, in part, is why the housing bust hurt so bad. I don't really think we should eliminate all production jobs, I'm just not sure which ones we can or ever get back, or should even try to get back. Steel sounds good, not sure about toys and clothing. Autos if we can convert it to a sustainable business that doesn't depend on creating replacements every 2-3 years. Aircraft (there's one where the health care subsidy hurts), Maybe silicon solar cells... there has to be some new manufacturing opportunities that we just haven't bothered to explore.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      However, for the what seems like the millionth time...

                                      Sorry.

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      slaveholding

                                      What generally is public opinion in the USA on this subject. How much influence does this public opinion, including any adverse publicity, have on such retailers. How ethical is the United States towards these impoverished foreign based workers. There was a time when our prestigious Marks & Spencer's sold items of clothing made in such sweatshops. But no more after the company was humiliated on national TV.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #100

                                      Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                      Sorry.

                                      I didn't mean millionth time to you. I was just afraid I was begining to sound like Johnny-one-note.

                                      Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                      How ethical is the United States towards these impoverished foreign based workers.

                                      Most people don't know, most of those who do - left, right, or center, don't care. Lou Dobbs is excoriated for bringing the issue up on his show.

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O Oakman

                                        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                        Sorry.

                                        I didn't mean millionth time to you. I was just afraid I was begining to sound like Johnny-one-note.

                                        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                        How ethical is the United States towards these impoverished foreign based workers.

                                        Most people don't know, most of those who do - left, right, or center, don't care. Lou Dobbs is excoriated for bringing the issue up on his show.

                                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #101

                                        Oakman wrote:

                                        I was just afraid I was begining to sound like Johnny-one-note.

                                        I'll let you know if and when you do.

                                        Oakman wrote:

                                        Most people don't know, most of those who do - left, right, or center, don't care.

                                        Then shame on them. People like you and me have a conscience. So these unfortunates will continue to be unfortunate and will continue to live and work in squalid conditions. Lou Dobbs - that's a name I remember from years ago - isn't he one of Ted Turner's anchormen at CNN?

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Oakman wrote:

                                          I was just afraid I was begining to sound like Johnny-one-note.

                                          I'll let you know if and when you do.

                                          Oakman wrote:

                                          Most people don't know, most of those who do - left, right, or center, don't care.

                                          Then shame on them. People like you and me have a conscience. So these unfortunates will continue to be unfortunate and will continue to live and work in squalid conditions. Lou Dobbs - that's a name I remember from years ago - isn't he one of Ted Turner's anchormen at CNN?

                                          O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          Oakman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #102

                                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                          Lou Dobbs - that's a name I remember from years ago - isn't he one of Ted Turner's anchormen at CNN?

                                          He was actually co-founder with Ted. Left CNN and started up Space.com, came back and became a voice for American populism. He's been attacked by the right because he doesn't think shipping our jobs out of country wholesale is a good things, and the left because he is an ardent capitalist and calls socialism, socialism when it rears its head. and by both sides because he's deadset against the invasion of illegals we are facing on our souther border. He's usually called a racist because he opposes any form of amnesty for them - which is ironic, since his wife is Mexican.

                                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups