Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Oil -- EVIL; Nucular -- EVILER; Solar -- SAINTLY ... just NIMBY

Oil -- EVIL; Nucular -- EVILER; Solar -- SAINTLY ... just NIMBY

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
com
52 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Ilion
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    ;) Fox, Politics: Feinstein: Don't Spoil Our Desert With Solar Panels[^]

    S C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      ;) Fox, Politics: Feinstein: Don't Spoil Our Desert With Solar Panels[^]

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Stan Shannon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Everyone should have seen that coming a million miles back. Of course, I'm sure she would be more than happy to fill up my Great Plains with millions of wind turbines.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        Everyone should have seen that coming a million miles back. Of course, I'm sure she would be more than happy to fill up my Great Plains with millions of wind turbines.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Of course, neither wind nor solar has any chance of feeding meaningful amounts of energy into the grid. But it is amusing to watch "liberals" shooting down their own panaceas.

        S L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Of course, neither wind nor solar has any chance of feeding meaningful amounts of energy into the grid. But it is amusing to watch "liberals" shooting down their own panaceas.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Not only that, but even after investing hundreds of billions of dollars in any such system, our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel. Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop, and our competitors will be able to continue to use it - running their operations far more cheaply and efficiently than we possibly can.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          L O 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Not only that, but even after investing hundreds of billions of dollars in any such system, our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel. Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop, and our competitors will be able to continue to use it - running their operations far more cheaply and efficiently than we possibly can.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            running their operations far more cheaply and efficiently than we possibly can.

            No change there, then.

            Bob Emmett

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              Not only that, but even after investing hundreds of billions of dollars in any such system, our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel. Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop, and our competitors will be able to continue to use it - running their operations far more cheaply and efficiently than we possibly can.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel.

              T. Boone Pickens didn't seem to think so, though, admittedly that was when the price of oil was a lot higher.

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop

              If the price drops, China, indeed, will be glad. But Russia, Venezuela, and Iran, just to mention a few, won't be happy at all, will they? Look at the dithering that OPEC is going through right now - announcing that for the good of the world they aren't going to cut production and begging Brazil to join them. In all honesty, I think talking too much about the future of energy production right now is wasted...er...energy. The way the economy is heading, we will be able to keep warm and read at night by burning dollar bills.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              S L B 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel.

                T. Boone Pickens didn't seem to think so, though, admittedly that was when the price of oil was a lot higher.

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop

                If the price drops, China, indeed, will be glad. But Russia, Venezuela, and Iran, just to mention a few, won't be happy at all, will they? Look at the dithering that OPEC is going through right now - announcing that for the good of the world they aren't going to cut production and begging Brazil to join them. In all honesty, I think talking too much about the future of energy production right now is wasted...er...energy. The way the economy is heading, we will be able to keep warm and read at night by burning dollar bills.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Shannon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Oakman wrote:

                In all honesty, I think talking too much about the future of energy production right now is wasted...er...energy. The way the economy is heading, we will be able to keep warm and read at night by burning dollar bills.

                I agree, but energy is likely to be the final nail in the coffin even if everything else is fixable. We simply cannot sustain a modern economy without cheap, reliable energy. And frankly, I think we are decades away from anything as efficient as fossil fuel, if it is possible at all. Any alternative must be integrated into the system piecemeal, based upon true global market conditions. A massive governmetn program to create an alternative market on a short time frame with bureaucratic oversight will almost certainly be catastrophic. Whoever ends up with enough oil to fuel a few divisions of tanks and aircraft will almost certainly end up controlling the world. Unless we just want to end it all with nukes first.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  our energy will still be far less efficient and far more expensive than it would be using fossil fuel.

                  T. Boone Pickens didn't seem to think so, though, admittedly that was when the price of oil was a lot higher.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Yet, because we are using less of it, the price will drop

                  If the price drops, China, indeed, will be glad. But Russia, Venezuela, and Iran, just to mention a few, won't be happy at all, will they? Look at the dithering that OPEC is going through right now - announcing that for the good of the world they aren't going to cut production and begging Brazil to join them. In all honesty, I think talking too much about the future of energy production right now is wasted...er...energy. The way the economy is heading, we will be able to keep warm and read at night by burning dollar bills.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Venezuela is hurting at this moment. Apparently they are having to re-think their budget in a big way.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  burning dollar bills

                  There certainly is enough of them floating around and may soon become cheaper to burn than natural gas :sigh:

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ilion

                    ;) Fox, Politics: Feinstein: Don't Spoil Our Desert With Solar Panels[^]

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Christian Graus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    The biggest issue is not morons who assume that there is a never ending supply of oil. It's not even how much energy we can hope to get from the sun. The big issue is that none of the alternatives, scale well. Sure, I can put solar on my roof. But, the environmental cost of creating panels for everyone, is as bad as using oil. Still, I drive a Prius. Why ? Well, I do like the car, but I think companies will look for ways for us to survive in ways that can be sustained, only if people are willing to pay for it.

                    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                    I 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C Christian Graus

                      The biggest issue is not morons who assume that there is a never ending supply of oil. It's not even how much energy we can hope to get from the sun. The big issue is that none of the alternatives, scale well. Sure, I can put solar on my roof. But, the environmental cost of creating panels for everyone, is as bad as using oil. Still, I drive a Prius. Why ? Well, I do like the car, but I think companies will look for ways for us to survive in ways that can be sustained, only if people are willing to pay for it.

                      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      Ilion
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Christian Graus wrote:

                      The big issue is that none of the alternatives, scale well. Sure, I can put solar on my roof. But, the environmental cost of creating panels for everyone, is as bad as using oil.

                      At least.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Ilion

                        Christian Graus wrote:

                        The big issue is that none of the alternatives, scale well. Sure, I can put solar on my roof. But, the environmental cost of creating panels for everyone, is as bad as using oil.

                        At least.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Christian Graus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Biofuel is just as bad. Fact is, there are no solutions that I can see, that will allow places like China, to enjoy a western standard of living, let alone to continue to support the West in that regard.

                        Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Christian Graus

                          The biggest issue is not morons who assume that there is a never ending supply of oil. It's not even how much energy we can hope to get from the sun. The big issue is that none of the alternatives, scale well. Sure, I can put solar on my roof. But, the environmental cost of creating panels for everyone, is as bad as using oil. Still, I drive a Prius. Why ? Well, I do like the car, but I think companies will look for ways for us to survive in ways that can be sustained, only if people are willing to pay for it.

                          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Ilion
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Christian Graus wrote:

                          The biggest issue is not morons who assume that there is a never ending supply of oil.

                          There is a reason we have to rely upon governmental bribes and compulsion ... along with false moralism ... to "encourage" people to recycle. It has nothing to do with "corporate greed," it has to do with the economic inefficiency ... the waste of time and resources ... which is the result of most recycling.

                          C L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            Biofuel is just as bad. Fact is, there are no solutions that I can see, that will allow places like China, to enjoy a western standard of living, let alone to continue to support the West in that regard.

                            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                            I Offline
                            I Offline
                            Ilion
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Christian Graus wrote:

                            Biofuel is just as bad.

                            Of course; it's a scam. Anything which must be subsidized to make it "affordable" is not; subsidies merely force Person B to pay for for Person A's usage.

                            Christian Graus wrote:

                            Fact is, there are no solutions that I can see, that will allow places like China, to enjoy a western standard of living, let alone to continue to support the West in that regard.

                            The lion's share of fossil fuels go toward generating electricity. Nuclear power can take up that slack. Sure, nuclear is not a total solution, but unless we come up with something better, we will have to go nuclear ... or die by the billions.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I Ilion

                              Christian Graus wrote:

                              The biggest issue is not morons who assume that there is a never ending supply of oil.

                              There is a reason we have to rely upon governmental bribes and compulsion ... along with false moralism ... to "encourage" people to recycle. It has nothing to do with "corporate greed," it has to do with the economic inefficiency ... the waste of time and resources ... which is the result of most recycling.

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Christian Graus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              People are 'encouraged' ( in quotes ) to recycle because of inefficiency, and recycling also CAUSES inefficiency ? What does that mean ? I read a book written by a rolling stone editor, in which he joined several conspiracy groups and also a number of churches in the south., He reports that the congregation were told that recycling and the Prius are 'unAmerican' and it's gods will that they pollute, basically. I was left very depressed.

                              Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                              I O S 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • I Ilion

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                Biofuel is just as bad.

                                Of course; it's a scam. Anything which must be subsidized to make it "affordable" is not; subsidies merely force Person B to pay for for Person A's usage.

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                Fact is, there are no solutions that I can see, that will allow places like China, to enjoy a western standard of living, let alone to continue to support the West in that regard.

                                The lion's share of fossil fuels go toward generating electricity. Nuclear power can take up that slack. Sure, nuclear is not a total solution, but unless we come up with something better, we will have to go nuclear ... or die by the billions.

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Christian Graus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yes, I see nuclear as pretty inevitable at this point.

                                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  In all honesty, I think talking too much about the future of energy production right now is wasted...er...energy. The way the economy is heading, we will be able to keep warm and read at night by burning dollar bills.

                                  I agree, but energy is likely to be the final nail in the coffin even if everything else is fixable. We simply cannot sustain a modern economy without cheap, reliable energy. And frankly, I think we are decades away from anything as efficient as fossil fuel, if it is possible at all. Any alternative must be integrated into the system piecemeal, based upon true global market conditions. A massive governmetn program to create an alternative market on a short time frame with bureaucratic oversight will almost certainly be catastrophic. Whoever ends up with enough oil to fuel a few divisions of tanks and aircraft will almost certainly end up controlling the world. Unless we just want to end it all with nukes first.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  I agree, but energy is likely to be the final nail in the coffin even if everything else is fixable

                                  It isn't fixable. I cannot imagine any of the major powers giving up their fiat money. As long as they can all print up a couple of trillion without having to back it up with anything except a smile, they will do so. The end will come quickly once it starts, and I see every indication that Obama's and Bernanke's and Little Timmie Geithner's lack of foresight will bring it on soon. 2012 may have prove that Nostradamus was too optimistic.

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  Unless we just want to end it all with nukes first.

                                  In another thread we came up with that particular battle being more likely one that Russia and China will wage.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Christian Graus

                                    People are 'encouraged' ( in quotes ) to recycle because of inefficiency, and recycling also CAUSES inefficiency ? What does that mean ? I read a book written by a rolling stone editor, in which he joined several conspiracy groups and also a number of churches in the south., He reports that the congregation were told that recycling and the Prius are 'unAmerican' and it's gods will that they pollute, basically. I was left very depressed.

                                    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Ilion
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Christian Graus wrote:

                                    People are 'encouraged' ( in quotes ) to recycle because of inefficiency, and recycling also CAUSES inefficiency ? What does that mean ?

                                    It means you're not trying to understand what I wrote.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Christian Graus

                                      People are 'encouraged' ( in quotes ) to recycle because of inefficiency, and recycling also CAUSES inefficiency ? What does that mean ? I read a book written by a rolling stone editor, in which he joined several conspiracy groups and also a number of churches in the south., He reports that the congregation were told that recycling and the Prius are 'unAmerican' and it's gods will that they pollute, basically. I was left very depressed.

                                      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Christian Graus wrote:

                                      I was left very depressed.

                                      Don't assume that Rolling Stone is a bastion of unbiased journalism and you might feel better. ;)

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Venezuela is hurting at this moment. Apparently they are having to re-think their budget in a big way.

                                        Oakman wrote:

                                        burning dollar bills

                                        There certainly is enough of them floating around and may soon become cheaper to burn than natural gas :sigh:

                                        O Offline
                                        O Offline
                                        Oakman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                        Apparently they are having to re-think their budget in a big way.

                                        Someone made the point recently that when venezuala got in trouble they moved to the right; when the US did, they moved to the left. Not sure if that means anything but it's interesting.

                                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Christian Graus

                                          People are 'encouraged' ( in quotes ) to recycle because of inefficiency, and recycling also CAUSES inefficiency ? What does that mean ? I read a book written by a rolling stone editor, in which he joined several conspiracy groups and also a number of churches in the south., He reports that the congregation were told that recycling and the Prius are 'unAmerican' and it's gods will that they pollute, basically. I was left very depressed.

                                          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                                          I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          Ilion
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Christian Graus wrote:

                                          I read a book written by a rolling stone editor, in which he joined several conspiracy groups and also a number of churches in the south., He reports that the congregation were told that recycling and the Prius are 'unAmerican' and it's gods will that they pollute, basically. I was left very depressed.

                                          The truth about the Prius[^]

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups