Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Eursoc: Inner city violence, Paris style: Warning, violent images

Eursoc: Inner city violence, Paris style: Warning, violent images

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
questionhtmlcomhosting
27 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    People have fear of gangs. Often they feel intimidated even if the gang is just standing around talking to each other doing no harm and minding their own business. Gangs irrespective of their skin colour, have a certain reputation that may not be wholly justified. Some of this culture of gangs can be put down to kids not having anything constructive to do with their lives and in many localities there is an absence of youth clubs or some other organized activities so they are bored. Of course, violent gangs such as reported here [^] need to be dealt with firmly. There certainly are moral dimensions to consider.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Gaskey
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

    There certainly are moral dimensions to consider.

    and so very many ways of apologizing for uncivilized behavior - don't you just love moral equivalency?

    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Bob Emmett wrote:

      Which they will.

      But what would be the difference between that and incidents such as this? This is simply another manifestation of the self loathing which cripples western civilazation. We deserve to be beaten by all the other people's of the world - we're white after all. And we must do everything possible to shackle and contain the "right wing", because that is the worst possible threat of all! :rolleyes:

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      But what would be the difference between that and incidents such as this?

      None.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      This is simply another manifestation of the self loathing which cripples western civilazation.

      Not on my part. The video should not be displayed until court procedings, and then, no doubt, it will enter the public domain. What I don't wan't the people like those I have worked with being beaten up by neo-Nazis just because they are Arab, Pakistani, or African in some sort of 'revenge' for attacks like these. (Or Jews were attacked in 'revenge' for the Israeli operations in Gaza). What I do want is the attackers tried with uncompromised evidence, put away and, if possible, deported.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      We deserve to be beaten by all the other people's of the world - we're white after all.

      Yes, after all, what have the British, Dutch, French, and Spanish ever done to the rest of the world - just because they weren't white? :)

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      And we must do everything possible to shackle and contain the "right wing"

      Neo-Nazis? Yes.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      because that is the worst possible threat of all!

      No, because they are among the many serious threats that western civilisation faces.

      Bob Emmett

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Ilíon quoted:

        A policeman posted the video on a Facebook site: He has been arrested and suspended from his post.

        It is evidence for the prosecution. It should not be compromised.

        Ilíon quoted:

        The authorities fear the video is being used by right-wing sites to stir up fear about racist violence by black and arab youths

        Which they will.

        Ilíon quoted:

        French authorities have been demanding the removal of the video from blogs and video hosting services.

        Not yet in the 21st century.

        Ilíon quoted:

        The President of the Paris transport authority RATP has described the video as "a crime in which the RATP is the victim"

        Meaningless drivel. X|

        Ilíon quoted:

        The same transport President Pierre Mongin described the bus driver's conduct as "exemplary."

        As this is real life, not a Bruce Willis movie, it is an example I would follow - contact the emergency services and sit tight.

        Ilíon quoted:

        violence was unexceptional for late-night services

        It certainly is: London, Manchester, Southampton, Wolverhampton, even Norwich has its moments.

        Ilíon quoted:

        According to the union, extreme violence is unexceptional; invading the privacy of the aggressors, however, goes beyond the pale.

        This paragraph merely reveals the author's bias; and innocence. The word "extreme" is introduced, and the invasion of the privacy of the victims, driver, and other passengers, is ignored. (Giving someone "a good kicking" may appear extreme to innocents abroad, it is, however, commonplace.) Also, as unexceptional does not mean acceptable, the use of "however" is meaningless. OK. those are my opinions, Polly, do you have any?

        Bob Emmett

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Bob Emmett wrote:

        it is an example I would follow - contact the emergency services and sit tight.

        Yep. That's what the passengers on the first three planes did on 9/11. The fourth group understood the futility of of playing Mr. Ostrich.

        Bob Emmett wrote:

        (Giving someone "a good kicking" may appear extreme to innocents abroad, it is, however, commonplace.)

        So that's how gun control is working out for you?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        L F 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Mike Gaskey

          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

          There certainly are moral dimensions to consider.

          and so very many ways of apologizing for uncivilized behavior - don't you just love moral equivalency?

          Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Mike Gaskey wrote:

          and so very many ways of apologizing for uncivilized behavior

          And, I am sure you agree, one very effective way of answering it.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

            I'm not convinced we can hang this on either the right wing or left wing.

            I'm actually pretty damned sure that if white gangs were beating up black folks on buses while calling them racial epithets, there would be far less moral confusion.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            white gangs were beating up black folks on buses while calling them racial epithets

            I doubt whether any white policeman would have posted the CCTV video on Facebook. Once upon a time, he may even have disabled the CCTV and joined in. :) But our police force is no longer 'institutionally racist'.

            Bob Emmett

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Mike Gaskey wrote:

              and so very many ways of apologizing for uncivilized behavior

              And, I am sure you agree, one very effective way of answering it.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Yes, but National Service was abolished. Might not be a bad idea to bring it back.

              L O 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Bob Emmett wrote:

                it is an example I would follow - contact the emergency services and sit tight.

                Yep. That's what the passengers on the first three planes did on 9/11. The fourth group understood the futility of of playing Mr. Ostrich.

                Bob Emmett wrote:

                (Giving someone "a good kicking" may appear extreme to innocents abroad, it is, however, commonplace.)

                So that's how gun control is working out for you?

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Bob Emmett wrote:

                contact the emergency services and sit tight

                Oakman wrote:

                That's what the passengers

                As a late-night bus driver in Paris, not as a passenger on a hijacked aeroplane. I have no idea what was possible in the first 3 planes.

                Oakman wrote:

                So that's how gun control is working out for you?

                Passengers and attackers shoot it out. Driver killed in crossfire. Bus swerves, collides with tanker. Tanker jack-knifes, overturns and spills fuel. Three lanes of traffic plough into tanker. All fuel tanks explode simultaneously. Only survivors are the attackers who race off into the night. Elderly, bald, NY cop, on exchange visit with Paris police, removes shirt and shoes, checks gun and ammo, and gives chase ... Quite well, thanks. :)

                Bob Emmett

                O F 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Yes, but National Service was abolished. Might not be a bad idea to bring it back.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                  National Service was abolished. Might not be a bad idea to bring it back.

                  Getting on a bit, Richard? Finding the Daily Wail a good read? :) I seem to remember we had Teddy Boys with razors and knives doing much the same thing even when we had National Service. Anyway, the services don't want oiks for just a couple of years, they are of no use. Unless ... didn't the Soviet Army use its middle-aged for clearing mine-fields in WWII? Now there's a possible role for oiks.

                  Bob Emmett

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                    National Service was abolished. Might not be a bad idea to bring it back.

                    Getting on a bit, Richard? Finding the Daily Wail a good read? :) I seem to remember we had Teddy Boys with razors and knives doing much the same thing even when we had National Service. Anyway, the services don't want oiks for just a couple of years, they are of no use. Unless ... didn't the Soviet Army use its middle-aged for clearing mine-fields in WWII? Now there's a possible role for oiks.

                    Bob Emmett

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                    Getting on a bit, Richard? Finding the Daily Wail a good read? Smile I seem to remember we had Teddy Boys with razors and knives doing much the same thing even when we had National Service.

                    Yes, no I never read that - the EDP (your son will know of that newspaper even if you don't) is more to my liking, and you are right about them.

                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                    the services don't want oiks for just a couple of years, they are of no use

                    The square bashing might instill discipline in them. If it is done proper, it should equip them with some skills that a future employer might make use of, and there certainly is enough lads and lasses below 25 years of age who are unemployed.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                      contact the emergency services and sit tight

                      Oakman wrote:

                      That's what the passengers

                      As a late-night bus driver in Paris, not as a passenger on a hijacked aeroplane. I have no idea what was possible in the first 3 planes.

                      Oakman wrote:

                      So that's how gun control is working out for you?

                      Passengers and attackers shoot it out. Driver killed in crossfire. Bus swerves, collides with tanker. Tanker jack-knifes, overturns and spills fuel. Three lanes of traffic plough into tanker. All fuel tanks explode simultaneously. Only survivors are the attackers who race off into the night. Elderly, bald, NY cop, on exchange visit with Paris police, removes shirt and shoes, checks gun and ammo, and gives chase ... Quite well, thanks. :)

                      Bob Emmett

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                      Quite well, thanks

                      You'd be surprised, I think, how the possibility of armed citizens tends to decrease criminal activity. For most of the history of Britain, outlaws had to deal with the idea that threatening John Q Public might permit them to make the aquaintance of John's broadsword, rapier, pistol, or revolver. These days all they have to worry about is John's waving the flag of surrender so vehemently every one's hair gets mussed.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Yes, but National Service was abolished. Might not be a bad idea to bring it back.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                        Yes, but National Service was abolished.

                        I'm of two minds about that. It's always seemed to me that the draft was a form of slavery. Yet I cannot deny that it was a great place to find orc fodder, and to force some weak sisters into joining the militia. Interestingly, recruiting for the National Guard is up in this country, recently. An increase in the unemployment rate is apparently good for volunteering.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          Bob Emmett wrote:

                          it is an example I would follow - contact the emergency services and sit tight.

                          Yep. That's what the passengers on the first three planes did on 9/11. The fourth group understood the futility of of playing Mr. Ostrich.

                          Bob Emmett wrote:

                          (Giving someone "a good kicking" may appear extreme to innocents abroad, it is, however, commonplace.)

                          So that's how gun control is working out for you?

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fred_
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          :thumbsup:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Bob Emmett wrote:

                            contact the emergency services and sit tight

                            Oakman wrote:

                            That's what the passengers

                            As a late-night bus driver in Paris, not as a passenger on a hijacked aeroplane. I have no idea what was possible in the first 3 planes.

                            Oakman wrote:

                            So that's how gun control is working out for you?

                            Passengers and attackers shoot it out. Driver killed in crossfire. Bus swerves, collides with tanker. Tanker jack-knifes, overturns and spills fuel. Three lanes of traffic plough into tanker. All fuel tanks explode simultaneously. Only survivors are the attackers who race off into the night. Elderly, bald, NY cop, on exchange visit with Paris police, removes shirt and shoes, checks gun and ammo, and gives chase ... Quite well, thanks. :)

                            Bob Emmett

                            F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fred_
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Bob Emmett wrote:

                            Passengers and attackers shoot it out. Driver killed in crossfire. Bus swerves, collides with tanker. Tanker jack-knifes, overturns and spills fuel. Three lanes of traffic plough into tanker. All fuel tanks explode simultaneously. Only survivors are the attackers who race off into the night. Elderly, bald, NY cop, on exchange visit with Paris police, removes shirt and shoes, checks gun and ammo, and gives chase ...

                            Every think of a career as a novelist?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                              I'm not convinced we can hang this on either the right wing or left wing.

                              I'm actually pretty damned sure that if white gangs were beating up black folks on buses while calling them racial epithets, there would be far less moral confusion.

                              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                              I Offline
                              I Offline
                              Ilion
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Stan Shannon wrote:

                              I'm actually pretty damned sure that if white gangs were beating up black folks on buses while calling them racial epithets, there would be far less moral confusion.

                              Amazing, isn't it?

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Oakman

                                Bob Emmett wrote:

                                Quite well, thanks

                                You'd be surprised, I think, how the possibility of armed citizens tends to decrease criminal activity. For most of the history of Britain, outlaws had to deal with the idea that threatening John Q Public might permit them to make the aquaintance of John's broadsword, rapier, pistol, or revolver. These days all they have to worry about is John's waving the flag of surrender so vehemently every one's hair gets mussed.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                You are not going to lure me down this well worn path. I do not advocate the USA changing its law on gun ownership, it is not my country, it is a democracy, it's up to your citizens to decide. I rather suspect that, like Prohibition, it would create more problems than it solved. Re: "Putting the boot in." When I used the word 'commonplace', I meant it in the context of drunken males. [corrected for typo]

                                Bob Emmett

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I Ilion

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  I'm actually pretty damned sure that if white gangs were beating up black folks on buses while calling them racial epithets, there would be far less moral confusion.

                                  Amazing, isn't it?

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Ilíon wrote:

                                  Amazing, isn't it?

                                  So you have established that there would be less moral confusion if whites were beating up blacks. Can you provide supporting evidence? Not the bleating of the liberal media; Not the exonerations of the defending lawyer; Real evidence of the moral confusion experienced by those involved in maintaining law and order. Said 'confusion' did not prevent them arresting three suspects.

                                  Bob Emmett

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    You are not going to lure me down this well worn path. I do not advocate the USA changing its law on gun ownership, it is not my country, it is a democracy, it's up to your citizens to decide. I rather suspect that, like Prohibition, it would create more problems than it solved. Re: "Putting the boot in." When I used the word 'commonplace', I meant it in the context of drunken males. [corrected for typo]

                                    Bob Emmett

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    Oakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                                    You are not going to lure me down this well worn path

                                    Was simply trying to share an opinion that might have caused you to think about the issue. I apologize for seeming to attempt to lure you into doing something you don't want to do.

                                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                                    When I used the word 'commonplace', I meant it in the context of drunken males.

                                    My experience with drunken males is they don't really worry about who they inflict themselves on. Is your experience different?

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Oakman

                                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                                      You are not going to lure me down this well worn path

                                      Was simply trying to share an opinion that might have caused you to think about the issue. I apologize for seeming to attempt to lure you into doing something you don't want to do.

                                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                                      When I used the word 'commonplace', I meant it in the context of drunken males.

                                      My experience with drunken males is they don't really worry about who they inflict themselves on. Is your experience different?

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      I apologize for seeming to attempt to lure you into doing something you don't want to do.

                                      To do that adequately, without merely stating an opinion, I would have to research the evidence, which would take time I cannot currently spare from being retired. :) The path has been well worn by the Oz vs USA posts, and I have nothing to add.

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      they don't really worry about who they inflict themselves on

                                      True, but the degree to which they inflict themselves is the problem. In Norwich, a city set in a rural area, a large shopping mall was excavated, using navvies from outside the area. They taught the locals how to 'really' brawl. The navvies are gone, but the escalated level of violence in late night brawls remains.

                                      Bob Emmett

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups