Being saved by the ozone hole?
-
You're a gullible moron if you think "Dr" Barnes used valid theories, valid data, and valid conclusions when he formulated that worthless junk. You're an idiot and you should stick to reading your little bloggers' and journalists' articles and stay away from things with genuine intellectual merit.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You're a gullible moron if you think "Dr" Barnes used valid theories, valid data, and valid conclusions when he formulated that worthless junk. You're an idiot and you should stick to reading your little bloggers' and journalists' articles and stay away from things with genuine intellectual merit.
Whatever are you on about, you pathetically intellectually-dishonest fool? Wikipedia: Earth's magnetic field - Magnetic field detection[^]
The Earth's magnetic field strength was measured by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1835 and has been repeatedly measured since then, showing a relative decay of about 5% over the last 150 years ...
-
I don't know what to do.
modified on Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:59 AM
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You're a gullible moron if you think "Dr" Barnes used valid theories, valid data, and valid conclusions when he formulated that worthless junk. You're an idiot and you should stick to reading your little bloggers' and journalists' articles and stay away from things with genuine intellectual merit.
Whatever are you on about, you pathetically intellectually-dishonest fool? Wikipedia: Earth's magnetic field - Magnetic field detection[^]
The Earth's magnetic field strength was measured by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1835 and has been repeatedly measured since then, showing a relative decay of about 5% over the last 150 years ...
You fail again. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2437/magnetic.htm[^] "In 1971, Barnes pointed out that, according to the data he had, the strength of the dipole component of the earth's magnetic field (measured in a unit known as a "gauss") has decreased between six and seven percent since it was first measured in 1835. Barnes then made the assumption that ALL of the non-dipole measurements constituted meaningless "noise", and asserted that only the dipole elements of the magnetic field are generated by the core. He further concluded that, because of the measured decrease in field strength, this dipole field must be decaying exponentially, with a half-life of approximately 1,400 years. Thus, Barnes calculated, by about 10,000 years ago, the earth's magnetic field would have so strong that life would have been impossible. Therefore, he concluded, the earth cannot be more than 10,000 years old. ... The Barnes/Humphreys hypothesis does not stand up to analysis. Barnes is correct that the dipole element of the magnetic field has indeed decreased in strength since the 19th century. However, as geologist Brent Dalrymple points out, "Barnes completely neglects the nondipole field. The same observatory measurements that show that the dipole moment has decreased since the early 1800's also show that this decrease has almost been completely balanced by an increase in the strength of the total observed field which has remained almost constant.""
-
You fail again. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2437/magnetic.htm[^] "In 1971, Barnes pointed out that, according to the data he had, the strength of the dipole component of the earth's magnetic field (measured in a unit known as a "gauss") has decreased between six and seven percent since it was first measured in 1835. Barnes then made the assumption that ALL of the non-dipole measurements constituted meaningless "noise", and asserted that only the dipole elements of the magnetic field are generated by the core. He further concluded that, because of the measured decrease in field strength, this dipole field must be decaying exponentially, with a half-life of approximately 1,400 years. Thus, Barnes calculated, by about 10,000 years ago, the earth's magnetic field would have so strong that life would have been impossible. Therefore, he concluded, the earth cannot be more than 10,000 years old. ... The Barnes/Humphreys hypothesis does not stand up to analysis. Barnes is correct that the dipole element of the magnetic field has indeed decreased in strength since the 19th century. However, as geologist Brent Dalrymple points out, "Barnes completely neglects the nondipole field. The same observatory measurements that show that the dipole moment has decreased since the early 1800's also show that this decrease has almost been completely balanced by an increase in the strength of the total observed field which has remained almost constant.""
Once again, what moronic jag are you on? Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying. But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I don't know what to do.
Stop being an attention-seeking fool? Figure out that there may be a reason that people tend to ignore you?
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3014067[^] http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3012596[^] http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3012592[^] http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3008991[^] http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3008979[^] http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=2605&msg=3008967[^] Yeah, I'm the attention seeker.
-
Once again, what moronic jag are you on? Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying. But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
Ilíon wrote:
Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying.
It's shown the dipole to be decreasing.
Ilíon wrote:
But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
Consider this: Creationist 'scientists' have a great deal to be gained by producing specific results, i.e. ones that point to a young earth. They will lie and falsify information in order to obtain these results, and then they sell their books and religion and whatever else. Actual scientists, on the other hand, only make money and earn a good reputation by discovering breakthroughs, and publishing in prestigious journals, and making very reliable and trustworthy experiments, and NOT conspiring against the Christian community.
-
_Damian S_ wrote:
You used to be such a nice boy...
When he was in the midst of the Terrible Twos? It's for sure that he was never nice when anyone here has known him.
Ilíon wrote:
It's for sure that he was never nice when anyone here has known him.
I was even nice to you, for a time. But it's hard to like someone who only likes himself.
-
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
And only a month back they were saying the Antartic HAD warmed up! The thing you hear all the time is that Antarctica is cooling and that's not the case," said Eric Steig of the University of Washington[^] These people are clearly lying.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
And only a month back they were saying the Antartic HAD warmed up! The thing you hear all the time is that Antarctica is cooling and that's not the case," said Eric Steig of the University of Washington[^] These people are clearly lying.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
I think the scientific consensus is that the world is heating up. I'll go with that.
-
Once again, what moronic jag are you on? Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying. But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
Ilíon wrote:
Once again, what moronic jag are you on? Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying. But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
...that you have stopped the goat from fucking your arse and have taken to sucking the got's dick. If you could spit it out for a minute you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
-
Ilíon wrote:
Once again, what moronic jag are you on? Scientific measurments of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying. But then, you "science" worshippers never really care about actual science or actual scientific results/findings, do you?
...that you have stopped the goat from fucking your arse and have taken to sucking the got's dick. If you could spit it out for a minute you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
Michael Martin wrote:
...that you have stopped the goat from f***ing your arse and have taken to sucking the got's dick. If you could spit it out for a minute you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
I see that you're doing that "projection" thingie, again.
Michael Martin wrote:
you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
You're such a fool. "Moroon" is a joke-spelling. And, if I remember correctly, one that L'il Tool has tried to apply to me. .................. Nevertheless, scientific measurements of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying.
-
Michael Martin wrote:
...that you have stopped the goat from f***ing your arse and have taken to sucking the got's dick. If you could spit it out for a minute you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
I see that you're doing that "projection" thingie, again.
Michael Martin wrote:
you might be able to pronounce (or spell) the word moron correctly instead of calling Ravel a bad shade of the colour red.
You're such a fool. "Moroon" is a joke-spelling. And, if I remember correctly, one that L'il Tool has tried to apply to me. .................. Nevertheless, scientific measurements of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying.
Ilíon wrote:
Tool
Yeah Tool! Woo! You're a fan as well? :-D
Ilíon wrote:
Nevertheless, scientific measurements of Earth's magnetic field over the past century and a half show it to be decaying.
Have not. Then again, maybe every physicist and geologist in the world is just conspiring against you. But seeing as how you don't know a Gauss from a Tesla from a Newton from a Helen from a Curie from a Coulomb from a Debye, I'm reluctant to side with you.
-
I think the scientific consensus is that the world is heating up. I'll go with that.
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I think the scientific consensus is that the world is heating up. I'll go with that.
Then you are an idiot.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Gee, thanks. I don't care - it doesn't interest me.
-
Gee, thanks. I don't care - it doesn't interest me.
-
I see your coral reef has miraculously recovered despite the doom mongers rantings.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
-
They got in my way...:suss:
-
They got in my way...:suss:
-
They probably had an existential crisis and drowned themselves! :laugh: ;P