Divine Retribution
-
If you think I posted that, please complain to Chris. You aren't important enough for me to run up a sock puppet. On the other hand, it would make great sense for you to have posted it yourself - after all, you are the one who begs for punishment. Hell, I didn't even know you had a blog.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
If you think I posted that, please complain to Chris. You aren't important enough for me to run up a sock puppet. On the other hand, it would make great sense for you to have posted it yourself - after all, you are the one who begs for punishment.
Riiiiight! I'm so unimportant to you that use my Christian name, which of no concern to anyone here, as often as you can think of a way to work it into a post. I'm so unimportant to you that you go out of your way to seek out personal information about me. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know where I live (even though you probably don't). Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know my phone number. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know my email address. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you "have access to records not available to" me (apparently, not taking into account that that does not make you a rational being).
-
Just for the record: it wasn't me. I wouldn't want somebody to post personal information about me, so wouldn't deliberately do it to anybody else. Besides, I don't have the motivation, resources or time
Computafreak wrote:
Just for the record: ...
Actually, if for some reason I were compelled to wager who it is, I'd place my bets on a certain "scientist" up in .... hmmm ... Vermont, who is even more obsessed with me than is our Dimestore Wooden Troll. At the same time ... Gaylord ;) suggests that it is 'Kyle' (whoever that is; I've never been totally sure on that point). And, well, those two do always seem to recognize one another; so perhaps that's it.
-
Oakman wrote:
If you think I posted that, please complain to Chris. You aren't important enough for me to run up a sock puppet. On the other hand, it would make great sense for you to have posted it yourself - after all, you are the one who begs for punishment.
Riiiiight! I'm so unimportant to you that use my Christian name, which of no concern to anyone here, as often as you can think of a way to work it into a post. I'm so unimportant to you that you go out of your way to seek out personal information about me. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know where I live (even though you probably don't). Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know my phone number. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know my email address. Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you "have access to records not available to" me (apparently, not taking into account that that does not make you a rational being).
Ilíon wrote:
I'm so unimportant to you that use my Christian name, which of no concern to anyone here, as often as you can think of a way to work it into a post.
I do it because it pisses you off. I like pissing you off. I like the way you whimper and moan about the unfairness of it all.
Ilíon wrote:
I'm so unimportant to you that you go out of your way to seek out personal information about me.
Took 30 seconds of one phonecall made for other reasons.
Ilíon wrote:
Apparently, I'm so unimportant to you that need to boast that you know my phone number.
You were claiming I didn't, so I assured you I did. Had you not been whining, I would never have thought about bringing it into the conversation.
Ilíon wrote:
apparently, not taking into account that that does not make you a rational being
Or that I have friends in Washington. Of course, having friends in Washington may suggest that I am not rational . . . Look - you think you have a case, cry-baby, go to Chris. FYI: I have emailed Christian and asked him if the offending messages should be deleted or censored. I just wish moderators had the power to check IP addresses. I still wonder if you posted this one yourself.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Computafreak wrote:
Just for the record: ...
Actually, if for some reason I were compelled to wager who it is, I'd place my bets on a certain "scientist" up in .... hmmm ... Vermont, who is even more obsessed with me than is our Dimestore Wooden Troll. At the same time ... Gaylord ;) suggests that it is 'Kyle' (whoever that is; I've never been totally sure on that point). And, well, those two do always seem to recognize one another; so perhaps that's it.
Ilíon wrote:
At the same time ... Gaylord Wink suggests that it is 'Kyle' (whoever that is; I've never been totally sure on that point). And, well, those two do always seem to recognize one another; so perhaps that's it.
I'm only guessing. If I remember correctly he did know all of that stuff, and 'Muslim_TenInches' reminds me of his old name 'DemonPossessed'. Also, I'm very sure that Oakman didn't do it, and in fact the only other person besides Kyle who would do it is Josh, but the posts contain too few spelling errors.
-
OK, now I'm not so confident that I do.
-
OK, now I'm not so confident that I do.
-
Computafreak wrote:
Just for the record: ...
Actually, if for some reason I were compelled to wager who it is, I'd place my bets on a certain "scientist" up in .... hmmm ... Vermont, who is even more obsessed with me than is our Dimestore Wooden Troll. At the same time ... Gaylord ;) suggests that it is 'Kyle' (whoever that is; I've never been totally sure on that point). And, well, those two do always seem to recognize one another; so perhaps that's it.
Ilíon wrote:
'Kyle' (whoever that is; I've never been totally sure on that point)
By my understanding, he's a troll who posted in the lounge for a while. Insignificant overall (but then, very few people are) It's probably someone who's lurked around for a long time and decided that he doesn't like you. Either that or someone testing to see how the loss of anonymity affects people's behaviour on the Internet