Peace with Iran
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
Iran becoming internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace.
What does that mean? And answer my question, why should Iran let then in? and what would the US do if they don't?
Josh Gray wrote:
What does that mean?
The meaning is simple and straightforward.
Josh Gray wrote:
why should Iran let then in?
For the purpose of Iran becoming internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace.
Josh Gray wrote:
and what would the US do if they don't?
Diplomats and negotiators will contact Iran with negotiations of reverse sanctions and financial initiatives.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
What does that mean?
The meaning is simple and straightforward.
Josh Gray wrote:
why should Iran let then in?
For the purpose of Iran becoming internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace.
Josh Gray wrote:
and what would the US do if they don't?
Diplomats and negotiators will contact Iran with negotiations of reverse sanctions and financial initiatives.
Intel 4004 wrote:
For the purpose of Iran becoming internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace.
Which means what? Are you able to give an explanation? Can you at least give a link to the video you got this phrase from? And anyway, isn't the global market place a tool of our evil overlords?
-
Got bored again? Why do you assume that Iran needs peacekeepers? The last time I looked they were not at war with anybody. Yes there are issues surrounding their Nuclear ambitions and their stance against the West and Israel, but neither of those are "breaking news" stories. Anyhow, even if peacekeepers were needed, what gives you the idea they would welcome peacekeepers from "The Great Satan"?
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace
You've been taking Salvia again. Haven't you. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace
You've been taking Salvia again. Haven't you. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
-
Got bored again? Why do you assume that Iran needs peacekeepers? The last time I looked they were not at war with anybody. Yes there are issues surrounding their Nuclear ambitions and their stance against the West and Israel, but neither of those are "breaking news" stories. Anyhow, even if peacekeepers were needed, what gives you the idea they would welcome peacekeepers from "The Great Satan"?
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Got bored again?
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Why do you assume that Iran needs peacekeepers?
You didn't even notice the way I worded the post did you? War with Iran, Iran needs US military presence. Iran must have a privately owned central bank and become globalized.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Got bored again?
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Why do you assume that Iran needs peacekeepers?
You didn't even notice the way I worded the post did you? War with Iran, Iran needs US military presence. Iran must have a privately owned central bank and become globalized.
Intel 4004 wrote:
Iran needs US military presence
Nope. They need USA military presence just as much as you need a hole drilled into the middle of your forehead.
Intel 4004 wrote:
Iran must have a privately owned central bank
Why privately owned? But they do have a central bank. Look here http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx[^]
Intel 4004 wrote:
War with Iran
Thinking of enlisting? Jon Oakman will probably be amused.
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
Iran needs US military presence
Nope. They need USA military presence just as much as you need a hole drilled into the middle of your forehead.
Intel 4004 wrote:
Iran must have a privately owned central bank
Why privately owned? But they do have a central bank. Look here http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx[^]
Intel 4004 wrote:
War with Iran
Thinking of enlisting? Jon Oakman will probably be amused.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Why privately owned?
The Fed and most if not all central banks which are privately owned, are used to manipulate nations since they are immediately in debt to the bank. Every currency unit printed or created is lent out at interest keeping the nations forever in debt. Wars are very profitable.
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
For the purpose of Iran becoming internationally economically feasible in the global marketplace.
Which means what? Are you able to give an explanation? Can you at least give a link to the video you got this phrase from? And anyway, isn't the global market place a tool of our evil overlords?
He's saying that the one world government will send in US troops so that Iran can contribute to the one world economy. Well, he WOULD say that, if he even understood the stuff he learned to parrot from a youtube video.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Why privately owned?
The Fed and most if not all central banks which are privately owned, are used to manipulate nations since they are immediately in debt to the bank. Every currency unit printed or created is lent out at interest keeping the nations forever in debt. Wars are very profitable.
so, if this doesn't happen, would that prove your conspiracy theories wrong ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )
-
He's saying that the one world government will send in US troops so that Iran can contribute to the one world economy. Well, he WOULD say that, if he even understood the stuff he learned to parrot from a youtube video.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )
Christian Graus wrote:
He's saying that the one world government will send in US troops so that Iran can contribute to the one world economy. Well, he WOULD say that, if he even understood the stuff he learned to parrot from a youtube video.
That's what I'd surmised but wouldn't it be UN troops? Man this conspiracy stuff is so confusing, if only I could use simple logic it would all be obvious to me.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
He's saying that the one world government will send in US troops so that Iran can contribute to the one world economy. Well, he WOULD say that, if he even understood the stuff he learned to parrot from a youtube video.
That's what I'd surmised but wouldn't it be UN troops? Man this conspiracy stuff is so confusing, if only I could use simple logic it would all be obvious to me.
-
so, if this doesn't happen, would that prove your conspiracy theories wrong ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
It takes a bit of high level thought to grasp the new world order. More than just simple "I'm hungry, I must eat" kind of logic you are used to.
And the ability to read The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.[^]
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
It takes a bit of high level thought to grasp the new world order. More than just simple "I'm hungry, I must eat" kind of logic you are used to.
And the ability to read The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.[^]
Bullshit. You will believe anything they dish out. That is the problem of many and that is why we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over. You can't see past the curtain they put up. They can word something cleverly and you will slurp it up. This is what you need to watch.[^]
-
Bullshit. You will believe anything they dish out. That is the problem of many and that is why we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over. You can't see past the curtain they put up. They can word something cleverly and you will slurp it up. This is what you need to watch.[^]
-
So you take the word of something called the Anglo Far-East Company over your own government?
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
Josh Gray wrote: So you take the word of something called the Anglo Far-East Company over your own government? Most definitely.
Are you aware that the Anglo Far-East Company is itself a form of bank and has a commercial interest in people believing the crap they spin in videos like the one you posted?
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
Josh Gray wrote: So you take the word of something called the Anglo Far-East Company over your own government? Most definitely.
Are you aware that the Anglo Far-East Company is itself a form of bank and has a commercial interest in people believing the crap they spin in videos like the one you posted?
-