Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. Visual Studio
  4. Disappointment

Disappointment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Visual Studio
c++visual-studiohelp
5 Posts 4 Posters 10 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    timhick
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So far I find myself a little disappointed by the product. Perhaps when I get use to it I'll begin to like it more. Found a probable bug within 30 minutes of using the IDE. I (basically) created a new Win32 C++ console application, #include'd iostream.h and compiled. Received a warning informing me that the iostream.h header file is depreciated. Double clicked on the task item for this warning and the application hangs. After restarting the IDE I was curious about the iostream.h warning. So I dug around in some of the other header files and discovered that this header will no longer be supported in VC8 and I should use "iostreams". Fair enough, shame the file doesn't exist (yet).

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T timhick

      So far I find myself a little disappointed by the product. Perhaps when I get use to it I'll begin to like it more. Found a probable bug within 30 minutes of using the IDE. I (basically) created a new Win32 C++ console application, #include'd iostream.h and compiled. Received a warning informing me that the iostream.h header file is depreciated. Double clicked on the task item for this warning and the application hangs. After restarting the IDE I was curious about the iostream.h warning. So I dug around in some of the other header files and discovered that this header will no longer be supported in VC8 and I should use "iostreams". Fair enough, shame the file doesn't exist (yet).

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Michael Dunn
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The correct include is

      #include <iostream>

      but that doesn't make the IDE any better. ;) --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Michael Dunn

        The correct include is

        #include <iostream>

        but that doesn't make the IDE any better. ;) --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bruce Duncan
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Was there a reason the powers that be decided to drop the .h from these header files ?

        Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
        'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

        M D 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B Bruce Duncan

          Was there a reason the powers that be decided to drop the .h from these header files ?

          Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
          'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Michael Dunn
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Maybe to differentiate the STL headers from the existing iostream library headers. --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.4 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Bruce Duncan

            Was there a reason the powers that be decided to drop the .h from these header files ?

            Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
            'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

            D Offline
            D Offline
            David Salter
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            is the correct header to use, is the old version which is still there for backwards compatibility. I believe this is the C++ standard, not a Microsoft decision. Dave.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups