Train in a tornado?
-
Christian Graus wrote:
The issue is that kids are working out where it goes, without understand what happens next.
Yes...I guess I needed the irony icon. Parents who think they are preventing teen sex by keeping them ignorant, may find out that ignorance isn't a barrier.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Yes...I guess I needed the irony icon.
*grin* fair enough
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Parents who think they are preventing teen sex by keeping them ignorant, may find out that ignorance isn't a barrier.
Here, kids in the low teens do a class where they get a baby doll that cries at night and needs to be changed. That's the sort of thing that sounds like a good idea to me, make them appreciate the reality of having a child, and then see if they make the right calls. And that is the sort of thing that goes on in sex education classes here, not showing kids porn or talking about how you can do whatever you want, if it feels good.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Bob Parks: Video of the day[^]
Thats wild.
-
Bob Parks: Video of the day[^]
-
Christian Graus wrote:
I honestly thought that people who opposed all sex education were a myth
They are a myth. I think the disagreement lies in who should do the educating.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
-
Thats wild.
-
Bob Parks: Video of the day[^]
Cool Vid, I bet the driver had to change his undercrackers after that one.
Software Kinetics (requires SL3 beta) - Moving software
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
I think the disagreement lies in who should do the educating.
And in what distinguishes 'teachong' from 'advocacy' and/or 'indoctrination.'
Yes, that was the point I think Christian was making about being involved enough to find out what is being taught. Parents should have the right to have their child exempted from the class without repercussions if they don't like what is being taught or if they feel like it is the parents responsibity to do the teaching.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
I think the disagreement lies in who should do the educating.
And in what distinguishes 'teachong' from 'advocacy' and/or 'indoctrination.'
Well, if you're too stupid to know that, then surely that proves that you are too stupid to teach your kids about sex, which is why the schools should. Boys have a penis. Girls have a vagina. This is teaching. Boys should put their penis into every vagina they can. That is advocacy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Yes, that was the point I think Christian was making about being involved enough to find out what is being taught. Parents should have the right to have their child exempted from the class without repercussions if they don't like what is being taught or if they feel like it is the parents responsibity to do the teaching.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
Exactly. If the school has to be transparent to parents, that only makes it more likely they will teach the facts without any sort of advocacy that parents may object to.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.