Another drop in the bucket: The Dihydrogen Monoxide Conspiracy
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Uh, so?
You need a grown up's perspective of the business world to see how greed and corruption will infiltrate the lives of the people that they have influence over. Your childish mind has not fully developed yet. The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America[^]
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
hardly any vaccines actually use mercury.
Proof? Which vaccines do and don't? What countries still permit it?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Vaccines are far more dangerous without a preservative than with one.
Proof? What about adjuvants? The three H1n1 vaccine injections that you will take are loaded with them.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Heck
Might as well kill them now with a cheap injection rather than wait to see if she might get cancer in the future (the vaccine hardly does anything to protect in the first place. It says so in Gardasil's own website.[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You need a grown up's perspective of the business world to see how greed and corruption will infiltrate the lives of the people that they have influence over. Your childish mind has not fully developed yet.
Shut up.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Proof? Which vaccines do and don't? What countries still permit it?
I've already given you such a list. Pay attention.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Proof?
Well, preservatives are there to kill pathogens, so you don't get a horrific infection when you're vaccinated. Hence the name.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What about adjuvants? The three H1n1 vaccine injections that you will take are loaded with them.
Do you even know what an adjuvant does?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Might as well kill them now with a cheap injection rather than wait to see if she might get cancer in the future (the vaccine hardly does anything to protect in the first place. It says so in Gardasil's own website.[^]
Well, let's look at the data for a second: there have been at minimum 23,000,000 vaccinations worldwide, with 11,916 adverse reactions; this amounts to 0.05%. 6% of these have been classified as serious, so an approximate estimate of your chance of having a serious adverse effect to vaccination is 0.003%. This is assuming that these are actual reactions to it, as the reports rely entirely on anecdote and with 23 million doses given, there's a high probability of coincidental illness. There have been around 20 deaths possibly associated with it. This amounts to a staggering 0.0001%.
-
Back in the early 1900's there were doctor recommended cigarettes. Take your mercury injections, they are so good for you. Awww, how caring and loving. Isn't it cute when girls die after being shot up?[^]
Not to mention Freudian Cocaine! :)
[](http://www.thehashtable.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=129&message=1>The Hash Table</a> </div></xml>)
-
People are incredibly stupid. This is the reason why the global warming scandal is going full force. They hear carbon dioxide and start clenching their fists thinking about all the carbon criminals. Oh, by the way, that website is an attempt at humor. Some people jokingly go around with video camera and ask people about DHMO and laugh at their stupidity. I know what fluoride is, I know what formaldehyde is, I know what mercury is, and none of them are good for you.
Fine words from a gentleman.[^]
modified on Friday, July 31, 2009 11:51 AM
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They hear carbon dioxide and start clenching their fists
:laugh: :doh: :~
[](http://www.thehashtable.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=129&message=1>The Hash Table</a> </div></xml>)
-
People are incredibly stupid. This is the reason why the global warming scandal is going full force. They hear carbon dioxide and start clenching their fists thinking about all the carbon criminals. Oh, by the way, that website is an attempt at humor. Some people jokingly go around with video camera and ask people about DHMO and laugh at their stupidity. I know what fluoride is, I know what formaldehyde is, I know what mercury is, and none of them are good for you.
Fine words from a gentleman.[^]
modified on Friday, July 31, 2009 11:51 AM
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They hear carbon dioxide and start clenching their fists
:laugh: :doh: Did I just lose the ability to read, or did the cap'n just plow a hihtherto unlowed low?
[](http://www.thehashtable.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=129&message=1>The Hash Table</a> </div></xml>)
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You need a grown up's perspective of the business world to see how greed and corruption will infiltrate the lives of the people that they have influence over. Your childish mind has not fully developed yet.
Shut up.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Proof? Which vaccines do and don't? What countries still permit it?
I've already given you such a list. Pay attention.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Proof?
Well, preservatives are there to kill pathogens, so you don't get a horrific infection when you're vaccinated. Hence the name.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What about adjuvants? The three H1n1 vaccine injections that you will take are loaded with them.
Do you even know what an adjuvant does?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Might as well kill them now with a cheap injection rather than wait to see if she might get cancer in the future (the vaccine hardly does anything to protect in the first place. It says so in Gardasil's own website.[^]
Well, let's look at the data for a second: there have been at minimum 23,000,000 vaccinations worldwide, with 11,916 adverse reactions; this amounts to 0.05%. 6% of these have been classified as serious, so an approximate estimate of your chance of having a serious adverse effect to vaccination is 0.003%. This is assuming that these are actual reactions to it, as the reports rely entirely on anecdote and with 23 million doses given, there's a high probability of coincidental illness. There have been around 20 deaths possibly associated with it. This amounts to a staggering 0.0001%.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Do you even know what an adjuvant does?
I know what it does and what it can do. Also I know its used to stretch out the virus material so the vaccine manufacturers don't have to use as much. It can damage your immune system since it has to work harder to do the same task, you immune system can actually start attacking the organs.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
There have been around 20 deaths possibly associated with it. This amounts to a staggering 0.0001%.
Its OK to kill a handful girls to slightly lessen the chance of a single type of cancer in some patients?
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Do you even know what an adjuvant does?
I know what it does and what it can do. Also I know its used to stretch out the virus material so the vaccine manufacturers don't have to use as much. It can damage your immune system since it has to work harder to do the same task, you immune system can actually start attacking the organs.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
There have been around 20 deaths possibly associated with it. This amounts to a staggering 0.0001%.
Its OK to kill a handful girls to slightly lessen the chance of a single type of cancer in some patients?
You're actually incredibly boring. Goodbye.
-
You're actually incredibly boring. Goodbye.
Murderer.
-
Murderer.
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped, first you avocate giving porn to kiddies, now you want to prevent them getting life saving vaccines because thier is a 1 in a million chance of an adverse reaction. oh by the way I hope your overlords dont see your argument as a far higher number of gun sales end in death - so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
-
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped, first you avocate giving porn to kiddies, now you want to prevent them getting life saving vaccines because thier is a 1 in a million chance of an adverse reaction. oh by the way I hope your overlords dont see your argument as a far higher number of gun sales end in death - so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
Alex hogarth wrote:
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
Alex hogarth wrote:
first you avocate giving porn to kiddies
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Alex hogarth wrote:
so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
Alex hogarth wrote:
first you avocate giving porn to kiddies
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Alex hogarth wrote:
so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
oh, so now you want to force your opinions on sex on everyone, you want to give children porn and then make them wait till the marriage before sex - sounds like you want a return to the days of old when women were chattels and married off at 12 as virgin brides. oh and is the comment about virgins a hope? do you think that being a virgin at your age will apeal to someone?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Yes you did, you posted about giving porn to children in exactly the same way that someone comment on comunism so if your argument against him is valid then by corralation you advocate giving porn to children
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
but on the brightside a large majority of these deaths would be the kind that of people you think the govenment wishes to elliminate anyway, so rather than hit an miss vaccines, or other weird stuff, it would be simple to ban guns, and as the undesirables come out of the woodwork bang... problem solved but then again without your penis subsitute what would happen to you?