Another drop in the bucket: The Dihydrogen Monoxide Conspiracy
-
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped, first you avocate giving porn to kiddies, now you want to prevent them getting life saving vaccines because thier is a 1 in a million chance of an adverse reaction. oh by the way I hope your overlords dont see your argument as a far higher number of gun sales end in death - so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
Alex hogarth wrote:
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
Alex hogarth wrote:
first you avocate giving porn to kiddies
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Alex hogarth wrote:
so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
so you think that allowing hundreds to die to save the few is ok? boy your warped
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
Alex hogarth wrote:
first you avocate giving porn to kiddies
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Alex hogarth wrote:
so using your argument would provide them with the perfect excuse to ban guns
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If they want to die of a vaccine that is supposed to protect them from getting cancer after they get an STD, then they can, and the taxpayers will likely fund it. Instead she might want to be more cautious about sleezing around and try to be more of an honorable women and get married to a man who is honorable. Two virgins will not have any STDs.
oh, so now you want to force your opinions on sex on everyone, you want to give children porn and then make them wait till the marriage before sex - sounds like you want a return to the days of old when women were chattels and married off at 12 as virgin brides. oh and is the comment about virgins a hope? do you think that being a virgin at your age will apeal to someone?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No I don't. I never said that. How dare you try to spread disinformation.
Yes you did, you posted about giving porn to children in exactly the same way that someone comment on comunism so if your argument against him is valid then by corralation you advocate giving porn to children
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
There would be far far more deaths and violence if they tried to ban guns here in America. That is an absolute fact.
but on the brightside a large majority of these deaths would be the kind that of people you think the govenment wishes to elliminate anyway, so rather than hit an miss vaccines, or other weird stuff, it would be simple to ban guns, and as the undesirables come out of the woodwork bang... problem solved but then again without your penis subsitute what would happen to you?