Annoyed with no one to lash out at
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
Hmmm..... I could work with this, but I think I'd have to take it down the path of the popularity of inscrutable acronyms. I realize I should know this by now, but what the *bleep* are WPF and WCF anyway? I keep hearing the acronyms tossed around, but since I've never actually used them, and have never seen sufficient reason to bother googling or wikiing these meaningless acronyms, I am completely in the dark. How can I properly hate them if there's no interface provided for implementing any negative emotions?
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
Gosh Mark ... the guy said he wanted an argument ... not a ... war. ;P
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLmodified on Tuesday, August 4, 2009 1:02 PM
-
The five minute, or the full half hour?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
You won't like it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
You won't like it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
You do realise that the marketing folk at Microsoft will treat that as an attributable endorsement? You'll find your mug plastered all over the packaging of Microsoft products from here on in :-D
-
No.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
... I am going to end this argument before it gets started. (extra points to anyone on the internet long enough to know why)
Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
-
... I am going to end this argument before it gets started. (extra points to anyone on the internet long enough to know why)
Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
-
No.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Try a mirror.
Todd Smith
-
How am I supposed to give you an argument if I don't even know what the parameter is?
Adam Maras | Software Developer Microsoft Certified Professional Developer
-
Try a mirror.
Todd Smith
-
For argument sake, yes, you do look like that.
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
You do realize that new frameworks like WPF, WCF are about MS making money and not about making anything better or easier. They get to sell training classes, books, new versions of development tools etc, etc, etc... The LINQ To SQL and Entity Models are awesome. Developers don't even need to know SQL, let alone database design. Personally I love the way that I can write the same application with one of 15 different frameworks that all accomplish the same thing.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
-
Trevortni wrote:
I'd like to have an argument, please.
All these advances in the C# language and the cool stuff in .NET (like WPF, WCF, etc) is making our lives as developers easier, faster, and simpler. In fact, pretty much, junior developers can use the .NET platform to build robust and maintainable without going through the design and testing hoops we used to all have to do, and they can crank out killer apps ahead of time and under budget. Oh, and with Entity Framework, nobody needs to worry about database design anymore. It just does it all for you--normalization, everything! Don't you agree??? Marc
I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner
:-D Bad Guy! :laugh:
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
How am I supposed to give you an argument if I don't even know what the parameter is?
Adam Maras | Software Developer Microsoft Certified Professional Developer
May be he'll accept variable number of arguments? (remember cstdarg? and the illustrious printf function?) :~
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
