If you code standard line of business applications or work in an IT department but not a software company...
-
I often tell people that SQL will cure cancer. You can do anything with it. Which is why linq ticks me off so much. So many developers are pawning SQL off as deceased and irrelevant and the shouldn't.
Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
I had a look at Linq to SQL and thought I already do all of this why do I want to do it differently, and add another layer of abstraction in there. I chucked it. I then looked into Linq to Datasets as I spend a lot of time manipulating datatables in the UI support layer. A great dissapintment, try doing a left join between a datatable and a List<> and bind it to a DGV, what a pita. So it got pared down to the absolute minimum.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I often tell people that SQL will cure cancer. You can do anything with it. Which is why linq ticks me off so much. So many developers are pawning SQL off as deceased and irrelevant and the shouldn't.
Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote:
Which is why Linq to SQL ticks me off so much.
Fixed that for you.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon Judah Himango