For the ignorant fools (more about the skunk)
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Ilíon wrote:
As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door.
Why three feet? Hold the gun to it's head, pull the trigger. Poke it to make sure it's dead. If it's not, shoot again.
Ilíon wrote:
Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Next time, shoot it and drown it. Make sure it dies right away, or don't even try to kill it.
It's a great day to be young and insane :cool:
-
Ilíon wrote:
As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door.
Why three feet? Hold the gun to it's head, pull the trigger. Poke it to make sure it's dead. If it's not, shoot again.
Ilíon wrote:
Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Next time, shoot it and drown it. Make sure it dies right away, or don't even try to kill it.
It's a great day to be young and insane :cool:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Why three feet? Hold the gun to it's head, pull the trigger. Poke it to make sure it's dead. If it's not, shoot again.
Because it was a *skunk* and I didn't want to be sprayed. Had it been any other sort of animal I was killing, I'd have made sure to shoot it in the head. Have you ever *seen* what it's like to shoot an animal in the head? These panty-waist pussies trying to call me immoral would faint to see such a sight.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Next time, shoot it and drown it.
How humane to drown a critter. And, it was still a skunk ... the problem is that one doesn't want to get near it.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Why three feet? Hold the gun to it's head, pull the trigger. Poke it to make sure it's dead. If it's not, shoot again.
Because it was a *skunk* and I didn't want to be sprayed. Had it been any other sort of animal I was killing, I'd have made sure to shoot it in the head. Have you ever *seen* what it's like to shoot an animal in the head? These panty-waist pussies trying to call me immoral would faint to see such a sight.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Next time, shoot it and drown it.
How humane to drown a critter. And, it was still a skunk ... the problem is that one doesn't want to get near it.
Ilíon wrote:
Because it was a *skunk* and I didn't want to be sprayed.
Throw an old blanket over it, or find some bubble-wrap?
Ilíon wrote:
Have you ever *seen* what it's like to shoot an animal in the head? These panty-waist pussies trying to call me immoral would faint to see such a sight.
Done it, that's how we make steak from pig. Yes, it's difficult. Try to ignore your feelings on such moments and remember that nature is much more cruel.
Ilíon wrote:
How humane to drown a critter. And, it was still a skunk ... the problem is that one doesn't want to get near it.
The humane thing is to limit the suffering as much as possible. Nature doesn't care about that suffering, and it doesn't limit it. Drowning a critter takes five minutes. A critter that's caught by a cat and escapes might take five days.
I are Troll :)
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
God, what a stupid _fuck - Bwana, the great white hunter, trying to show off his macho micro-nuts. The only possible way it could have been more pathetic would have been if the ignorant _motherfucker had shot himself in the foot...
modified on Sunday, September 13, 2009 8:51 AM
-
God, what a stupid _fuck - Bwana, the great white hunter, trying to show off his macho micro-nuts. The only possible way it could have been more pathetic would have been if the ignorant _motherfucker had shot himself in the foot...
modified on Sunday, September 13, 2009 8:51 AM
LunaticFringe wrote:
God, what a stupid _fuck - Bwana, the great white hunter, trying to show off his macho micro-nuts. The only possible way it could have been more pathetic would have been if the ignorant _motherfucker had shot himself in the foot...
Bubba, you're so worthless.
-
Ilíon wrote:
Because it was a *skunk* and I didn't want to be sprayed.
Throw an old blanket over it, or find some bubble-wrap?
Ilíon wrote:
Have you ever *seen* what it's like to shoot an animal in the head? These panty-waist pussies trying to call me immoral would faint to see such a sight.
Done it, that's how we make steak from pig. Yes, it's difficult. Try to ignore your feelings on such moments and remember that nature is much more cruel.
Ilíon wrote:
How humane to drown a critter. And, it was still a skunk ... the problem is that one doesn't want to get near it.
The humane thing is to limit the suffering as much as possible. Nature doesn't care about that suffering, and it doesn't limit it. Drowning a critter takes five minutes. A critter that's caught by a cat and escapes might take five days.
I are Troll :)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Throw an old blanket over it, or find some bubble-wrap?
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Did you even try to comprehend what I wrote? The skunk let loose with his spray *after* I'd closed the door, and still within minutes the whole house (and it's not a particularly small house[^]) was filled with the stench, and for many hours. I don't even want to contemplate a direct hit.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Throw an old blanket over it, or find some bubble-wrap?
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Did you even try to comprehend what I wrote? The skunk let loose with his spray *after* I'd closed the door, and still within minutes the whole house (and it's not a particularly small house[^]) was filled with the stench, and for many hours. I don't even want to contemplate a direct hit.
Ilíon wrote:
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
I've had half a bottle of Vodka. You shouldn't eat the animal if the liver is spotted, or if the meat looks gray.
Ilíon wrote:
Did you even try to comprehend what I wrote?
Yup. What gave you the impression that I failed to do so?
Ilíon wrote:
The skunk let loose with his spray *after* I'd closed the door,
Yeah, that stinks.
I are Troll :)
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
How come you didn't just call animal control?
Because I've done that before and it's pointless. edit: Also, this was over the weekend. So, even if "animal control" wasn't useless, unless they've changed their attitude and hours, there was no one there even to answer the phone.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
How come you didn't just call animal control?
Because I've done that before and it's pointless. edit: Also, this was over the weekend. So, even if "animal control" wasn't useless, unless they've changed their attitude and hours, there was no one there even to answer the phone.
Did you call the number I gave you?
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
OK, so it's the skunks fault that you a- can't shoot straight b- didn't hang around to check if you'd done the job
Ilíon wrote:
And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Yeah, that would have taken a lot longer than your failed shooting attempt. When I have to kill an animal, I cut it's head clean off. That tends to work pretty quick. If it's a bigger animal, I pay someone to give it an injection, so it goes to sleep.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
OK, so it's the skunks fault that you a- can't shoot straight b- didn't hang around to check if you'd done the job
Ilíon wrote:
And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Yeah, that would have taken a lot longer than your failed shooting attempt. When I have to kill an animal, I cut it's head clean off. That tends to work pretty quick. If it's a bigger animal, I pay someone to give it an injection, so it goes to sleep.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
b- didn't hang around to check if you'd done the job
... which anyone who actually tries to kill an animal would naturally do. No, I suspect he shot it to wound it, and left it to suffer. He's already demonstrated a desire to cause the thing extended suffering. He simply played with it a little differently.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
b- didn't hang around to check if you'd done the job
... which anyone who actually tries to kill an animal would naturally do. No, I suspect he shot it to wound it, and left it to suffer. He's already demonstrated a desire to cause the thing extended suffering. He simply played with it a little differently.
Exactly. I have 5 roosters, because I hate having to kill anything. When I do it, I will stick around to make sure it's as quick and painless as it can be.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
-
This is for those totally ignorant fools on their moral high-horse about the trapped skunk ... I used a friend's gun to shoot the critter. Pretty humane, right? Wrong! If you people didn't get your ideas about guns and their effects from TV, you'd already know that shooting something doesn't automatically kill it. As I said, I shot the skunk ... at close range, as in less than three feet away. I saw it react to the bullets, and then I slammed the door. Within minutes, the whole house was reeking in skunk stench (which hung around for many hours), so I had more evidence that I'd got him. Later in the day, I went down to dispose of the carcase. It was still alive! With two bullets in it. How humane that was, right? And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
-
My god you're a little cunt. Do you think the overall outcome was better than if you had of drowned it?
I'm not sure if this was an accidental repost, or if you (rightly) figured this was worth saying twice.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
I'm not sure if this was an accidental repost, or if you (rightly) figured this was worth saying twice.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
OK, so it's the skunks fault that you a- can't shoot straight b- didn't hang around to check if you'd done the job
Ilíon wrote:
And let's not even get into the suggestion that I drown it.
Yeah, that would have taken a lot longer than your failed shooting attempt. When I have to kill an animal, I cut it's head clean off. That tends to work pretty quick. If it's a bigger animal, I pay someone to give it an injection, so it goes to sleep.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
My god you're a little cunt. Do you think the overall outcome was better than if you had of drowned it?
I wish I was as fortunate as fortunate as me
Josh Gray wrote:
My god you're a little c***.
And you're jealous.
Josh Gray wrote:
... if you had of ...
And illiterate.
Josh Gray wrote:
Do you think the overall outcome was better than if you had of drowned it?
Fool, the question was not whether the animal dies, but how much suffering it endures. I cannot countenance drowning an animal.