Speaking of design patterns...
-
I have created a new design pattern: If it doesn't work, use BeginInvoke. It's simple, elegant and above all it works! Try it free for 14 days! Results not guaranteed. Individual results may vary. Use in conjunction with another proven design pattern for optimal results. This pattern is not guaranteed to treat, diagnose or cure any existing problems in your code, either real or imagined. Use of this pattern is subject to a complex and arbitrary set of terms and conditions.
The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter
-
I have created a new design pattern: If it doesn't work, use BeginInvoke. It's simple, elegant and above all it works! Try it free for 14 days! Results not guaranteed. Individual results may vary. Use in conjunction with another proven design pattern for optimal results. This pattern is not guaranteed to treat, diagnose or cure any existing problems in your code, either real or imagined. Use of this pattern is subject to a complex and arbitrary set of terms and conditions.
The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter
The first law of programming:
Zerodoesn't work? Tryone! :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
I have created a new design pattern: If it doesn't work, use BeginInvoke. It's simple, elegant and above all it works! Try it free for 14 days! Results not guaranteed. Individual results may vary. Use in conjunction with another proven design pattern for optimal results. This pattern is not guaranteed to treat, diagnose or cure any existing problems in your code, either real or imagined. Use of this pattern is subject to a complex and arbitrary set of terms and conditions.
The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. To launch a new pattern you should come up with a catchy name (for the pattern), decide on the category it belongs to, and make sure you're part of some gang of more than three. Then write a book; when finished, come up with an even better pattern. etc. Now that is a pattern (actually it is the "pattern factory pattern"). I'm off writing a book... :)
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
-
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. To launch a new pattern you should come up with a catchy name (for the pattern), decide on the category it belongs to, and make sure you're part of some gang of more than three. Then write a book; when finished, come up with an even better pattern. etc. Now that is a pattern (actually it is the "pattern factory pattern"). I'm off writing a book... :)
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
Luc Pattyn wrote:
To launch a new pattern you should come up with a catchy name (for the pattern), decide on the category it belongs to, and make sure you're part of some gang of more than three.
The same for oldie goldie porn movie. :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
The first law of programming:
Zerodoesn't work? Tryone! :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]yeah, but after trying zero, one, and many, what do you do if it still doesn't work? hint: the answer is not 42. :sigh:
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
-
yeah, but after trying zero, one, and many, what do you do if it still doesn't work? hint: the answer is not 42. :sigh:
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
If
zerodoesn't work,onedoes. That's the trick. :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Luc Pattyn wrote:
To launch a new pattern you should come up with a catchy name (for the pattern), decide on the category it belongs to, and make sure you're part of some gang of more than three.
The same for oldie goldie porn movie. :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]yeah! :rolleyes:
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
modified on Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:30 PM
-
I have created a new design pattern: If it doesn't work, use BeginInvoke. It's simple, elegant and above all it works! Try it free for 14 days! Results not guaranteed. Individual results may vary. Use in conjunction with another proven design pattern for optimal results. This pattern is not guaranteed to treat, diagnose or cure any existing problems in your code, either real or imagined. Use of this pattern is subject to a complex and arbitrary set of terms and conditions.
The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter
This one is most often used where the members of a team are all under long-term contracts that are extendable: The "don't check program assumptions patterns" After all, if a method returns a collection, the first element in the collection is not only guaranteed to exist but will be the item you are looking for. A corollary is the Architect pattern: If a given problem takes 2 months to program, an extensible framework can be written in 18 months that will allow the same problem to be solved in 4 months.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
-
I have created a new design pattern: If it doesn't work, use BeginInvoke. It's simple, elegant and above all it works! Try it free for 14 days! Results not guaranteed. Individual results may vary. Use in conjunction with another proven design pattern for optimal results. This pattern is not guaranteed to treat, diagnose or cure any existing problems in your code, either real or imagined. Use of this pattern is subject to a complex and arbitrary set of terms and conditions.
The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter
Miszou wrote:
BeginInvoke
That may be more popular in Tel Aviv.
-
This one is most often used where the members of a team are all under long-term contracts that are extendable: The "don't check program assumptions patterns" After all, if a method returns a collection, the first element in the collection is not only guaranteed to exist but will be the item you are looking for. A corollary is the Architect pattern: If a given problem takes 2 months to program, an extensible framework can be written in 18 months that will allow the same problem to be solved in 4 months.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." --Stephen Crane
5 for those two elegantly framed patterns, Ennis. best, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844