Government Hijacks Kids TV To Propagandize For Swine Flu Shots
-
I'm sure your concerns for that particular family comes straight from your ever endearing wooden heart, to their absolute delight and joy. So how many have to suffer and perhaps die because of your ignorant conspiracy filled excuse for a brain?
You got it backwards. You should be asking, "How many have to die do to tainted vaccines that the government says are safe when they are not, and why does the media have to lie so much?"
-
You got it backwards. You should be asking, "How many have to die do to tainted vaccines that the government says are safe when they are not, and why does the media have to lie so much?"
How many have died from the 2009 swine flu vaccine? Let's see numbers.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
This is NOT the first Swine Flu. There was one back in 1976, and there was a huge problem with badly-made vaccines that affected something like 10 people per million vaccinated (0.001%). Even that small percentage caused them to withdraw it.
That is why you shouldn't take this vaccine. It is a repeat of 1976, tens of thousands were injured by that vaccine, government said it was safe, it wasn't safe. Mercury is a nerotoxin, squaline is highly dangerous, both are responsible for millions of neurological disorders and death around the world. Gardisil has killed thousands of girls, yet it is still given to young girls because they say its worth killing a few so the rest will have an insignificant decrease in the risk of being harmed by a particular STD that they could avoid by not being sleazy.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It is a repeat of 1976
Right, because medical technology obviously has not advanced at all in 33 years. Is this a recurring theme with you? Do you not realize that history is FULL of mistakes, and that a fair percentage of the time, people LEARN from them? We're talking about scientists here, not politicians.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Gardisil has killed thousands of girls
What is it with you and numbers? The article in Wikipedia:[^] states that out of the first 23 million doses administered, there were 36 deaths. Sure, it's not zero, but where are you getting "thousands" from?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Distind wrote:
Would you like to compare it to how many died to the diseases before the vaccines came around?
Studies show that vaccines aren't the reason why public health has improved. Running sterile water and improved hygiene are the number one contributes of the decline of death from diseases.
In general? Of course. Now show me how it's been more effective against specific diseases. But it sounds like a nice bit of misdirection to claim that somehow they haven't been effective. I'm sure if you compare the 1930s to the 1960s the differences are massive thanks to cleaner living conditions. However diseases didn't start getting completely wiped out until vaccines came along.
-
In general? Of course. Now show me how it's been more effective against specific diseases. But it sounds like a nice bit of misdirection to claim that somehow they haven't been effective. I'm sure if you compare the 1930s to the 1960s the differences are massive thanks to cleaner living conditions. However diseases didn't start getting completely wiped out until vaccines came along.
Distind wrote:
However diseases didn't start getting completely wiped out until vaccines came along.
The diseases were never wiped out. They were only reduced after people learned about germs and how to avoid getting sick by sterilizing water, not sharing drinks and utensils, and disinfecting their household. Vaccines had NOTHING to do with it, vaccines have caused more harm than good. Mercury is a nerotoxin, adjuvants are extremely dangerous.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It is a repeat of 1976
Right, because medical technology obviously has not advanced at all in 33 years. Is this a recurring theme with you? Do you not realize that history is FULL of mistakes, and that a fair percentage of the time, people LEARN from them? We're talking about scientists here, not politicians.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Gardisil has killed thousands of girls
What is it with you and numbers? The article in Wikipedia:[^] states that out of the first 23 million doses administered, there were 36 deaths. Sure, it's not zero, but where are you getting "thousands" from?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
The H1N1 vaccine contains the same deadly dangerous mercury and adjuvants as before, and the manufacture of these new injections was/is rushed and approved without proper testing and research. The manufacturers have been given legal immunity against any lawsuits caused by the injections.
-
The H1N1 vaccine contains the same deadly dangerous mercury and adjuvants as before, and the manufacture of these new injections was/is rushed and approved without proper testing and research. The manufacturers have been given legal immunity against any lawsuits caused by the injections.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The H1N1 vaccine contains the same deadly dangerous mercury and adjuvants as before, and the manufacture of these new injections was/is rushed and approved without proper testing and research. The manufacturers have been given legal immunity against any lawsuits caused by the injections.
[Citation Needed]Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Distind wrote:
However diseases didn't start getting completely wiped out until vaccines came along.
The diseases were never wiped out. They were only reduced after people learned about germs and how to avoid getting sick by sterilizing water, not sharing drinks and utensils, and disinfecting their household. Vaccines had NOTHING to do with it, vaccines have caused more harm than good. Mercury is a nerotoxin, adjuvants are extremely dangerous.
-
You got it backwards. You should be asking, "How many have to die do to tainted vaccines that the government says are safe when they are not, and why does the media have to lie so much?"
MMR got bad press because of a poor research. Measles is making a comeback and that is more deadly than the now unproven risk of the MMR jab. So the media got it wrong *NOT* because the media lie, but because the published research was poor, scare mongering and proven to be wrong. My statement [quote] So how many have to suffer and perhaps die because of your ignorant conspiracy filled excuse for a brain? [/quote] stands unchallenged.
-
Distind wrote:
However diseases didn't start getting completely wiped out until vaccines came along.
The diseases were never wiped out. They were only reduced after people learned about germs and how to avoid getting sick by sterilizing water, not sharing drinks and utensils, and disinfecting their household. Vaccines had NOTHING to do with it, vaccines have caused more harm than good. Mercury is a nerotoxin, adjuvants are extremely dangerous.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Vaccines had NOTHING to do with it, vaccines have caused more harm than good.
Alright, let's see your impressive scientific evidence to back this up. Since obviously you know far more about this than anyone else here, otherwise you'd just look like a blithering idiot.