Beautiful, just beautiful. I love this....
-
Go guzzle the bottle, then pick the "roll jam" out of your lard rolls and lick your ball grease paste off of your hands.
I have a wife to do that for me, you only have your mother. Come on chimpy, get that brain muscle flexing, we are all a'dither to see what inane act of dimness will spout forth from your ignorant, torpid brain next.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
-
I'm no climate scientist, but I don't see any denial that they intentionally altered the "decline." If you actually READ what I quoted instead of mindlessly finding another AJ-inspired link, you'll see that they did that to correct known and generally-accepted inaccuracies in the source data. As in, something like "Well, this data source is uniformly off by about 5 degrees, as is shown in decades X, Y, and Z, when compared to all of our other sources, so we'll extrapolate and correct it so our results are consistent."
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
Just an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming.
-
Just an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming.
Again, read what I quoted two posts ago.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Go guzzle the bottle, then pick the "roll jam" out of your lard rolls and lick your ball grease paste off of your hands.
-
I have a wife to do that for me, you only have your mother. Come on chimpy, get that brain muscle flexing, we are all a'dither to see what inane act of dimness will spout forth from your ignorant, torpid brain next.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
You know it might take a while for him to look up all those $.25 words you used, right? Kudos on the use of chimpy when not refering to G.W.
-
c - continue to believe the fraudulent scientists that were caught manipulating the data and engaging in corrupt policies and malicious tactics to try convince the world that there is a warming trend when in reality there is cooling trend.
-
Again, read what I quoted two posts ago.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Christian Graus wrote:
There are no facts to support your claims
Saying that does not make it true. You have my permission to Google climategate and get your dumbass educated.
There is nothing about 'climategate' that supports you or disproves what I have said.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
how does that prove or disprove global warming as a whole ?
The whole pile of BS called global warming or climate change came from those scientists. They are the ones peddling that nonsense, and thank God that they have been exposed. The 30k scientists that have real peer reviewed solid science, who the IPCC fraudsters hate, are the ones you need to be looking into.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The whole pile of BS called global warming
And this is why you will remain ignorant. Because you want to be.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
I've seen all this before. It's still all ignorant drivel.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
No, they just have some big words and his dictionary broke lookign up the last insult Dalek Dave handed him.
-
I've seen all this before. It's still all ignorant drivel.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
But it is on the internet!!! IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
No but you are afraid to challenge yours, even when they have been proven to be based on a fraudulent lie.
-
But it is on the internet!!! IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!
"Surely you don't think Gilligan's Island is real!" "Those poor people..." -- Galaxy Quest
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
No but you are afraid to challenge yours, even when they have been proven to be based on a fraudulent lie.
Strawman. You took your position ("no") and applied it to him and then attacked him as if it was his position. Your attempt to win the argument through deception has been logged and noted. You currently refuse to read the information presented, are unwilling to challenge your worldview and are basing the comment of it being fradulent on incorrect data. Try again, only this time don't use a strawman argument.
-
Strawman. You took your position ("no") and applied it to him and then attacked him as if it was his position. Your attempt to win the argument through deception has been logged and noted. You currently refuse to read the information presented, are unwilling to challenge your worldview and are basing the comment of it being fradulent on incorrect data. Try again, only this time don't use a strawman argument.
The "information" he posted is an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming. It is a hot load of hoarse shit. It further solidifies the fact that they manipulated the data to hide the decline.
-
No but you are afraid to challenge yours, even when they have been proven to be based on a fraudulent lie.
I understand that it's because your life in the real world is empty, that you need to try to make yourself feel good with this drivel, but I've read plenty on all sides of AGW before coming to a conclusion, one that I leave open in the face of any emerging evidence. You, on the other hand, watch the youtube videos that feed your bias, and then let it grow and fester, by hiding it from anything that might contradict it.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
The "information" he posted is an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming. It is a hot load of hoarse shit. It further solidifies the fact that they manipulated the data to hide the decline.
No it is not. Strawman again. Do you like it when Business executives tell you how to code? Do they know all the ins and outs of using classes, methods and OO programming? The answer is probably "no." So where do you come from telling scientists that their methods, systems and data is made up or just plain wrong? Some laymen gets their hands on info that uses profession specific jargon and decides the term "trick" means the literal meaning of the word. And you don't question that? Cause if someone read my correspondence to another programmer I obviously mean that I should use 20+ school kids to perform a function in my program, right? Cause that is a class... I know someone in a related field. The trick is, in fact, just showing the numbers in an easy to see manned. Because laymen are idiots and need everything plotted out for them. And the whole thing with the rings was because the data stopped working right after that point. It becomes unreliable. So they drop it completely after that point. Why is it unreliable? No clue, but rather than keep faulty data, they ditch it. How do they know it is faulty? They have other data that has been verified and shown to be correct. So you make up a position for him, don't bother reading the data and explain away your easy to defeat position. That's Number 2 today.
-
The facts that come from all sorts of scientific bodies, around the world. Like I said, even if you're right and one body is discredited, that doesn't prove that every scientist who has ever said anything that disagrees with your imaginary worldview, is lying.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Also, there are 30k + scientists that actually do real peer reviewed research. Then there are the fraudulent IPCC criminals that were paid with taxpayer's money and have been proven as criminally fraudulent. Those 30k+ scientists are real scientists that work on real science. Instead you believe the fraudsters.