So my boss is oredering me a new PC
-
Let me get the first part of that quote for you.
Website:
The PCIe x8 interface used by RAIDDrive SSDs supports 2GB/sec bandwidth, more than ten times that of the SATA-II 3Gbps bus
aspdotnetdev wrote:
Let me get the first part of that quote for you.
Doh! I'm going brain dead :(
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition -
Let me get the first part of that quote for you.
Website:
The PCIe x8 interface used by RAIDDrive SSDs supports 2GB/sec bandwidth, more than ten times that of the SATA-II 3Gbps bus
That number could be misquoted. From here* it says a PCIe 2.0 x8 interface should do 4GB/sec, if MY math is correct. * http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/[^]
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition -
Too bad they don't even provide the specs of the hard drive (which is the most important part of the PC).
If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Photos/CP Flickr Group - ScrewTurn Wiki v3
What part of "1TB 7200RPM" did you miss (or did they add that after your post)?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
-
That number could be misquoted. From here* it says a PCIe 2.0 x8 interface should do 4GB/sec, if MY math is correct. * http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/[^]
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth EditionThat's my guess. That'd put them at 10.666 times faster.
-
That number could be misquoted. From here* it says a PCIe 2.0 x8 interface should do 4GB/sec, if MY math is correct. * http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/[^]
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition -
What part of "1TB 7200RPM" did you miss (or did they add that after your post)?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
Not all 1TB 7200 RPM drives are created equal. 16MB cache < 32MB. 5x200MB < 4x250MB < 3x333MB < 2x500MB platters. Some manufactures are marginally faster or quieter as are some lines within a manufacturers product lines. eg WD Black 7200RPM drives are slightly faster and louder than the Blue series. NTM some companies are having a period of poor quality; most recently seagate.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Sorry about that.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
Just kidding (fortunately)... :rolleyes:
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
-
No 300 is correct. SATA uses 8/10 bit encoding[^] to balance the DC load on its data lines and only transmits a single byte of data per 10 bits transmitted. May other data buses (most notably PCIe1.0/2.0) do the same. There are more efficient encoding systems being used in some newer ultra high speed links, eg 10GB Ethernet and PCIe3.0 which use 64/66 bit encoding[^] to get Gb/sec to ~= 8*GB/sec.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
The machine will give the highest possible Windows Experience Index.
Nope. You'd need an SSD to max out the HD rating at a minimum. IIRC a single 260 falls short of max on the GPU test as well.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
When I checked the machine (older version with Vista) at the store, it gave a Vista rating of 5.9.
-
No 300 is correct. SATA uses 8/10 bit encoding[^] to balance the DC load on its data lines and only transmits a single byte of data per 10 bits transmitted. May other data buses (most notably PCIe1.0/2.0) do the same. There are more efficient encoding systems being used in some newer ultra high speed links, eg 10GB Ethernet and PCIe3.0 which use 64/66 bit encoding[^] to get Gb/sec to ~= 8*GB/sec.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
That all sounds very confusing and, so, probably correct. ;P
-
When I checked the machine (older version with Vista) at the store, it gave a Vista rating of 5.9.
getting 7.9 is weven is rather difficult. My system gives: CPU 7.6 i7-920 @3.85gz RAM 7.8 DDR3 1627 GFX (both) 7.2 SLI 260's HDD 6.9 Indilinx SSD New s1366 chips are regularly breaking 4ghz so that might be doable before gulftown in a single sockect platform. Faster ram would probably break that bottleneck. The GPU would likely require 2x 295, 2x 4870x2s, 2x 5870, or a 5970 minimum. On the HDD front the only saneish option would be an intel SSD.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
My New PC The specs are really good, I can't wait to get it.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
Unfortunately, the motherboard in that thing is junk. There are reports of the system freezing (and not in a cold sort of way) and some SATA problems. Other people have reported that upgrading the video sometimes has problems. Hopefully, yours will have a motherboard with those problems fixed. (A guy at work bought one for himself. So far it's worked, though its not clear why he had to reboot the system a few times. I think he said it didn't freeze, but the performance suddenly dropped.)
-
getting 7.9 is weven is rather difficult. My system gives: CPU 7.6 i7-920 @3.85gz RAM 7.8 DDR3 1627 GFX (both) 7.2 SLI 260's HDD 6.9 Indilinx SSD New s1366 chips are regularly breaking 4ghz so that might be doable before gulftown in a single sockect platform. Faster ram would probably break that bottleneck. The GPU would likely require 2x 295, 2x 4870x2s, 2x 5870, or a 5970 minimum. On the HDD front the only saneish option would be an intel SSD.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Dan Neely wrote:
etting 7.9 is weven is rather difficult.
Wow! They have updated the experience index based on the trends in the hardware and it looks pretty strict.
-
Dario Solera wrote:
7200rpm is the bare minimum.
No that's 5400RPM (many laptop drives, and the WD green series). The WD greens are perfect for USB enclosures since you're bottlenecked by the bus badly; and for bulk data storage because they're marginally cheaper, run cooler (less power consumption, less heat aging), and spin slower (less mechanical load on moving parts - longer life expectancy, also quieter). I wouldn't recommend one as a primary drive; but if you have an SSD for your OS/apps your mp3/mpg collection won't be affected any by being put on the green drive. Edit: actually IIRC there's a few laptop drives that are only 4200RPM.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Dan Neely wrote:
No that's 5400RPM
I don't even consider them to be rotating at all. Seriously, a 5400rpm disk is below acceptable performance. I had to replace one in my laptop with a 7200rpm (Seagate Momentus 7200.4 320GB).
If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Photos/CP Flickr Group - ScrewTurn Wiki v3
