No, really CaptainSeeSharp
-
I've cited loads of documents, whitepapers, lines and page numbers of bills, mainstream news articles, documentaries, and direct CSPAN video of bernake and paulson being questioned so many times its ridiculous. Now tell me what you have cited.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
-
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
-
josda1000 wrote:
Y2K didn't happen.
Because action was taken to ensure that it didn't happen.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
Well that's kinda what I mean though. People (because humans are smart) found a way to not let it happen. Do you really think that people would just line up for the FEMA camps?! come on. Yes, I realize that's kinda what happened with the holocaust, but only because they were pitting race vs race. Most people nowadays are enlightened to not do so, even though there are still racists in the country. It wouldn't have happened. I think you see my point. You just need to look at the greater picture.
-
Well that's kinda what I mean though. People (because humans are smart) found a way to not let it happen. Do you really think that people would just line up for the FEMA camps?! come on. Yes, I realize that's kinda what happened with the holocaust, but only because they were pitting race vs race. Most people nowadays are enlightened to not do so, even though there are still racists in the country. It wouldn't have happened. I think you see my point. You just need to look at the greater picture.
-
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Keep making those excuses. Don't you recall the youtube video you posted about the 'prison' that was not used, and was going to be a death camp ? All your claims about mercury causing autism ? All my posts explaining that autism is not a disease, and you can't catch it ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Just because it did happen, in specific circumstances, doesn't prove it's going to happen in completely different ones.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
josda1000 wrote:
People in military would not just go along with that.
That's the other major flaw with the 'we need guns to protect us from the government' theory. The military refusing to attack the civilians they swore to protect, is a far greater reason that will never happen, than the ownership of a few pop guns.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
josda1000 wrote:
People in military would not just go along with that.
That's the other major flaw with the 'we need guns to protect us from the government' theory. The military refusing to attack the civilians they swore to protect, is a far greater reason that will never happen, than the ownership of a few pop guns.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Well, don't take it out of context. It did happen in Germany, and even here, like CSS said, with the Japanese. But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen. If there's an actual revolt/revolution though, the military would be against us, definitely. So yes, you do need the second amendment. BUT the government would not take a first step in that direction toward total imprisonment. They would lose, definitely.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
We live in different times, but the same thing goes on. War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Climate Change, it all leads to absolute tyranny in the end unless people stand up and take action, denial will only progress tyranny.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Why did you come back? You said where not worth it, you said you had better shit to do. You said we cannot be educated and that we where not worth your time. Why the hell did you come back here?
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
I note he did not answer you.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
We live in different times, but the same thing goes on. War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Climate Change, it all leads to absolute tyranny in the end unless people stand up and take action, denial will only progress tyranny.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
This is one of those meaningless, unqualified statements that impress you so when people make them on youtube, and you get so confused that they don't work in the real world.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Well, don't take it out of context. It did happen in Germany, and even here, like CSS said, with the Japanese. But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen. If there's an actual revolt/revolution though, the military would be against us, definitely. So yes, you do need the second amendment. BUT the government would not take a first step in that direction toward total imprisonment. They would lose, definitely.
josda1000 wrote:
But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen.
If everyone is completely dependent on the government for food, shelter, clothing, heat, and they are so indoctrinated and brainwashed, do you not think people will go into shelters if there is an economic collapse with terrorist and bio-threats all over the place and people just want to be safe and fed. The propaganda line would possibly be "Red Cross Center - People Helping People".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
josda1000 wrote:
But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen.
If everyone is completely dependent on the government for food, shelter, clothing, heat, and they are so indoctrinated and brainwashed, do you not think people will go into shelters if there is an economic collapse with terrorist and bio-threats all over the place and people just want to be safe and fed. The propaganda line would possibly be "Red Cross Center - People Helping People".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
This is an incredibly elaborate fantasy world that you live in. How could EVERYONE be dependent on the government for those things ? How do you get to that point ? How are you even on that road ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
We live in different times, but the same thing goes on. War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Climate Change, it all leads to absolute tyranny in the end unless people stand up and take action, denial will only progress tyranny.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Well, I half agree with you. But you still miss my point. These are not on only one segment of OUR population. War on Terror: Directed to the Mid-East, that the CIA uses to attack "right-wing extremists", and now calling us "domestic terrorists". This is not a racial thing; it's a logic problem that the populous gets confused on. Yay media! Yay fascism! War on Drugs: Just a cartel that the CIA likes to gets the populous confused on, as well. Yay media! Yay fascism! War on Climate Change: Yeah, I haven't heard that term yet. Please don't create new ones for them to steal and use in the media. But yeah, I understand it. Yay media! Yay fascism! BUT! These are not racial issues. Though, they are conquering and dividing pretty well, aren't they? First they take away power from the states, then divide us again by idealism.
-
Well, I half agree with you. But you still miss my point. These are not on only one segment of OUR population. War on Terror: Directed to the Mid-East, that the CIA uses to attack "right-wing extremists", and now calling us "domestic terrorists". This is not a racial thing; it's a logic problem that the populous gets confused on. Yay media! Yay fascism! War on Drugs: Just a cartel that the CIA likes to gets the populous confused on, as well. Yay media! Yay fascism! War on Climate Change: Yeah, I haven't heard that term yet. Please don't create new ones for them to steal and use in the media. But yeah, I understand it. Yay media! Yay fascism! BUT! These are not racial issues. Though, they are conquering and dividing pretty well, aren't they? First they take away power from the states, then divide us again by idealism.
Erroll Southers is Barack Obamas nominee to head the Transportation Safety Administration — the TSA, that organization that screens passengers getting on airplanes. [^] http://ctpatriot1970.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/wtf-obama%E2%80%99s-tsa-nominee-targets-anti-government-christians-must-read/[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
josda1000 wrote:
But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen.
If everyone is completely dependent on the government for food, shelter, clothing, heat, and they are so indoctrinated and brainwashed, do you not think people will go into shelters if there is an economic collapse with terrorist and bio-threats all over the place and people just want to be safe and fed. The propaganda line would possibly be "Red Cross Center - People Helping People".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Well, let's bring it back to the American Revolution. A lot of people did align with Britain, and only about 10% of the population sided with the "rebels", or the colonies. Of the 10%, only about 30% actually fought the redcoats. The people that didn't want to fight the British were "safe", and didn't want change; they were dependent on the mother country. You can't change everyone's minds. It takes time. Calling them names isn't going to change a damned thing. It will sound (and does sound) like you're insane. And the funny thing is, I'm on your side. They'll come around. They already are. Look at the supreme court decision just made. Look at Scott Brown and how he's already succumbing to the health care thing, when he was railing against it. Democrats + Republicans = Republicrats. Big government. Yay fascism.
-
Erroll Southers is Barack Obamas nominee to head the Transportation Safety Administration — the TSA, that organization that screens passengers getting on airplanes. [^] http://ctpatriot1970.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/wtf-obama%E2%80%99s-tsa-nominee-targets-anti-government-christians-must-read/[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Yeah. I know. I told you that earlier. They're calling you and I "right-wing extremists." And anti-government (just as the founding fathers were). I'm not even Christian really anymore, but I'll be put into that term. I'm not anti-abortion, I just have principles. Ah well.
-
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
josda1000 wrote:
My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them.
Now that I remember, he said that the flu fear mongering was going to be the next "false-flag" to see if they can bring us further into a police-state. They use fear of invisible phantom type things (terrorists, carbon dioxide, bio-threats) to force us into submission slowly but surely (rationing, invasion of privacy, humiliation, letting go of liberty, surrendering your wealth, loss of sovereignty, tolerance of brutality and corruption, and so on).
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Because his girlfriend had a puncture and he lost his pizza delivery job.
------------------------------------ No Good Deed Goes Unpunished Clare Boothe Luce