variables
-
You really need to buy this book[^] and read it. The point of the forums is not to teach people the basics of the language - the forums are here to help people with specific problems they may have.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
What difference does it make?
-
What difference does it make?
it may be important when a method needs huge amounts of local variables: it may work well when they get allocated and freed by the smallest code block that contains them, it may throw a StackOverflowException when all of them get allocated upfront. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
it may be important when a method needs huge amounts of local variables: it may work well when they get allocated and freed by the smallest code block that contains them, it may throw a StackOverflowException when all of them get allocated upfront. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
Luc Pattyn wrote:
when a method needs huge amounts of local variables
:| Refactor?
-
Luc Pattyn wrote:
when a method needs huge amounts of local variables
:| Refactor?
Isn't that going to use more stack space? Return addresses, and so forth...
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in. Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
-
Isn't that going to use more stack space? Return addresses, and so forth...
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in. Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
Yeah, well, you could delegate some data to local variables in a different method, executed by some other thread. So basically implement an in-stack database, using Invoke to call on a single GetSet() method. But then that may be over-engineering the situation a bit. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
Yeah, well, you could delegate some data to local variables in a different method, executed by some other thread. So basically implement an in-stack database, using Invoke to call on a single GetSet() method. But then that may be over-engineering the situation a bit. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
Yeah, well, you could delegate some data to local variables in a different method, executed by some other thread. So basically implement an in-stack database, using Invoke to call on a single GetSet() method. But then that may be over-engineering the situation a bit. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
Remind me to suggest it at the next code review... :-D
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in. Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
