Daily newsletter has link to virus infected site
-
Technically, for about 8 years :) Specifically: our ad system (AdSignia) is our own and all ads are served from this. Every ad you see has been specifically added to the system and its files are hosted on our servers, with one exception: Some companies have their entire campaigns running through ad management systems such as Atlas so they can manage and track everything in one place. For these ads we have to insert a call to Atlas (et al.) instead of hosting the files ourselves, and then Atles will send down the final images using javascript. The code to serve these ads is standard 3rd party ad serving code used on almost every site on the net and is safe. The files that ultimately get sent down are images and flash files supplied by the advertisers themselves. Nokia, RIM, Microsoft and PayPal have no interest in supplying infected ads. They'd be the laughing stock of the 'net.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Has the mix changed over the last 4 or 5 years then? I normally filter banners out automatically, but when I started paying attention again after reading this thread I noticed that unlike in the past when almost everything got through a lot of your current ads are running afoul of domainbans I've set due to popovers, gross images, intellitext, etc they've served up elsewhere.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Has the mix changed over the last 4 or 5 years then? I normally filter banners out automatically, but when I started paying attention again after reading this thread I noticed that unlike in the past when almost everything got through a lot of your current ads are running afoul of domainbans I've set due to popovers, gross images, intellitext, etc they've served up elsewhere.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Ads are new being served from a.lakequincy.com instead of codeproject.com after our move from our old system to our new system. That may be part of it. Another point may be that we are getting more advertising from larger companies, and it's these big boys who like their own toys.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Ads are new being served from a.lakequincy.com instead of codeproject.com after our move from our old system to our new system. That may be part of it. Another point may be that we are getting more advertising from larger companies, and it's these big boys who like their own toys.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Chris Maunder wrote:
Ads are new being served from a.lakequincy.com instead of codeproject.com after our move from our old system to our new system. That may be part of it.
This is probably it; I've blocked them over stuff they've served elsewhere. Does ABP provide a way to set exceptions (other than completely disabling itself) on a per site basis? Edit: How long ago did you start using lakequincy? I'm curious how long I'd been referring to CP as a site that hosted all its advertising and was spared collateral damage from what was being run on other sites while it was no longer the case.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
Ads are new being served from a.lakequincy.com instead of codeproject.com after our move from our old system to our new system. That may be part of it.
This is probably it; I've blocked them over stuff they've served elsewhere. Does ABP provide a way to set exceptions (other than completely disabling itself) on a per site basis? Edit: How long ago did you start using lakequincy? I'm curious how long I'd been referring to CP as a site that hosted all its advertising and was spared collateral damage from what was being run on other sites while it was no longer the case.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Dan Neely wrote:
How long ago did you start using lakequincy
Only since last week. It's why we've all been so quiet ;) The upgrade is now complete so we're having some fun time this week.
Dan Neely wrote:
spared collateral damage from what was being run on other sites
Not sure what you mean. The ads we had running early last week are exactly the same we have running this week - we just moved our systems to a new codebase, server and domain name, but the ad data is the same. There will be no leakage of other random ads making their way into CodeProject. No punch-the-monkey ads on our network, thank you very much. [Edit] Sorry - forgot one point: I'm sure Adblock Plus must have a little intelligence built in to allow ads on a site A to be served from site B. Surely...
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Dan Neely wrote:
How long ago did you start using lakequincy
Only since last week. It's why we've all been so quiet ;) The upgrade is now complete so we're having some fun time this week.
Dan Neely wrote:
spared collateral damage from what was being run on other sites
Not sure what you mean. The ads we had running early last week are exactly the same we have running this week - we just moved our systems to a new codebase, server and domain name, but the ad data is the same. There will be no leakage of other random ads making their way into CodeProject. No punch-the-monkey ads on our network, thank you very much. [Edit] Sorry - forgot one point: I'm sure Adblock Plus must have a little intelligence built in to allow ads on a site A to be served from site B. Surely...
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Chris Maunder wrote:
[Edit] Sorry - forgot one point: I'm sure Adblock Plus must have a little intelligence built in to allow ads on a site A to be served from site B. Surely...
I can't find any way to do so except completely turning ad blocking off on a site and since there're ad servers like doubleclick that I'm unwilling to ever allow to send content my way that's not an option. This basically flows into what I meant by collateral damage. When SiteWithNastyAds.com hosts an eyesore from randomAdHost.com, the only consistent way to block it is to block *.randomadhost.com/* (I've tried more nuanced blocking in the past but it never stays blocked for long). By default (and apparently without any override available) this blocks randomadhost's ads on every site, with the result that there's no way to block offensive advertising without killing every ad by the provider on every site regardless of if most of what the provider serves is acceptable.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
[Edit] Sorry - forgot one point: I'm sure Adblock Plus must have a little intelligence built in to allow ads on a site A to be served from site B. Surely...
I can't find any way to do so except completely turning ad blocking off on a site and since there're ad servers like doubleclick that I'm unwilling to ever allow to send content my way that's not an option. This basically flows into what I meant by collateral damage. When SiteWithNastyAds.com hosts an eyesore from randomAdHost.com, the only consistent way to block it is to block *.randomadhost.com/* (I've tried more nuanced blocking in the past but it never stays blocked for long). By default (and apparently without any override available) this blocks randomadhost's ads on every site, with the result that there's no way to block offensive advertising without killing every ad by the provider on every site regardless of if most of what the provider serves is acceptable.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
This is all great feedback. One thing we're planning on doing is moving to Amazon S3 for hosting static content, and that would include our ads. If you keep Amazon and CodeProject unblocked then we're good to go. [Post caffeine Edit] You mentioned "since they're ad servers lick doubleclick". For ads served from Atlas or DoubleClick I can totally understand blocking them completely since there seems to be no easy way to block them with a "-CodeProject" setting. However, LakeQuincy.com can be safely added to your whitelist because every ad on that network is an ad sold by our salesteam who work by our own ad guidelines on what's acceptable (ads relevant to software developers) and what's not (anything else)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
This is all great feedback. One thing we're planning on doing is moving to Amazon S3 for hosting static content, and that would include our ads. If you keep Amazon and CodeProject unblocked then we're good to go. [Post caffeine Edit] You mentioned "since they're ad servers lick doubleclick". For ads served from Atlas or DoubleClick I can totally understand blocking them completely since there seems to be no easy way to block them with a "-CodeProject" setting. However, LakeQuincy.com can be safely added to your whitelist because every ad on that network is an ad sold by our salesteam who work by our own ad guidelines on what's acceptable (ads relevant to software developers) and what's not (anything else)
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Chris Maunder wrote:
You mentioned "since they're ad servers lick doubleclick". For ads served from Atlas or DoubleClick I can totally understand blocking them completely since there seems to be no easy way to block them with a "-CodeProject" setting. However, LakeQuincy.com can be safely added to your whitelist because every ad on that network is an ad sold by our salesteam who work by our own ad guidelines on what's acceptable (ads relevant to software developers) and what's not (anything else)
:confused: Is LakeQuincy not serving content for anyone else?
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
You mentioned "since they're ad servers lick doubleclick". For ads served from Atlas or DoubleClick I can totally understand blocking them completely since there seems to be no easy way to block them with a "-CodeProject" setting. However, LakeQuincy.com can be safely added to your whitelist because every ad on that network is an ad sold by our salesteam who work by our own ad guidelines on what's acceptable (ads relevant to software developers) and what's not (anything else)
:confused: Is LakeQuincy not serving content for anyone else?
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Only for other developer sites such as ASP alliance, DevMavens, ASP.NET etc.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
Only for other developer sites such as ASP alliance, DevMavens, ASP.NET etc.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
ahh. Well at least that explains why I had a block. ASP.NET was in my browser history and after temporarily whitelisting it and doing a few refreshes while I didn't see anything hosted by LakeQuincy some of the sites ads were running against my animation tolerance threshold. PS I did find how to set a per-site exception in ABP. Open the blockable items list, right click on a filtered item and the context menu lets you disable it for the current site. It's done.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
ahh. Well at least that explains why I had a block. ASP.NET was in my browser history and after temporarily whitelisting it and doing a few refreshes while I didn't see anything hosted by LakeQuincy some of the sites ads were running against my animation tolerance threshold. PS I did find how to set a per-site exception in ABP. Open the blockable items list, right click on a filtered item and the context menu lets you disable it for the current site. It's done.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
asp.net uses a few different ad providers - we're just one of them.
Dan Neely wrote:
PS I did find how to set a per-site exception in ABP
Brilliant. I'll add these to our notes.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP