Following on from my post about the IACs rsport on the IPCC 4ar, here is a piece discussing what the IPCC did to generate such criticism
-
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6221[^] "Yesterday, after a four-month review, a committee of scientists concluded that the Nobel prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has “assigned high confidence to statements for which there is very little evidence”, has failed to enforce its own guidelines, has been guilty of too little transparency, has ignored critical review comments and has had no policies on conflict of interest”. Enormous and expensive policy changes have been based on the flawed work of these scientists. Yet there is apparently to be no investigation, blame, suspension or withdrawal of papers, just a gentle bureaucratic fattening of the organisation with new full-time posts." He takes the same position as I do, that science is being damaged by this scam, and it must act to protect itself from this happening.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription