Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Ah the irony of it

Ah the irony of it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
66 Posts 11 Posters 7 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    No, they don't. Obamacare is just a mandate to buy insurance from the same big insurance companies that have been trumping you like a cheap whore. Ontop of that they are raising their rates (which oboomboo promised wouldn't happen). Also, we are going bankrupt, any tax money that goes into this is already spent and it just isn't going to work. You will get an asprin for a heart attack. You will get a free abortion, you will get free vaccines, you will get free SSRIs and opiates, but you will not get healthcare.

    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Europe.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Europe.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CaptainSeeSharp
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      What about Europe and how does it relate to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by obama?

      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W wolfbinary

        Since he barely knows how to read CSS can converse with someone else. After having read the damn thing or enough of it to destroy anyone's arguments about it I can say it leaves a lot to be ultimately decided and what the administration says about it is true. Since everyone will need health care at some point in their life the providing mechanism isn't all that important. Even the CBO says it will reduce the deficit and if CSS cares at all about that he'd be for it. Repealing it will add to the deficit or so the CBO also says. Don't believe me look it uphttp://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/health.cfm[^]. Irony is lost on him don't waste your time.

        That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CaptainSeeSharp
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        I find it hard to believe that there are really people out there that might be intelligent, but still believe everything the government says in spite of monumental corruption and criminality.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W wolfbinary

          http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=529AD458-F859-AAB8-4D74EDC0FFA2DD0D[^] A tea party candidate who ran on repeal of Obama Care because it's a government take over of health care wants to know why he has to wait a month for his. He goes on to say how he's never worked for any employer who doesn't cover you on day one. That's funny I've never worked for anyone who did. Nice, what a tosser.

          That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Majerus
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            What about Europe and how does it relate to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by obama?

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            We have to buy insurance from big bad insurance companies. Apparently it works.

            C S 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C CaptainSeeSharp

              Whats the big deal? Obamacare and the healthcare he gets from Congress are completely different in every way.

              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              Whats the big deal?

              Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it. Why doesn't he just pay for his healthcare from his own pocket, instead of stealing it from the pockets of the hard pressed middle classes?

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                Whats the big deal?

                Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it. Why doesn't he just pay for his healthcare from his own pocket, instead of stealing it from the pockets of the hard pressed middle classes?

                C Offline
                C Offline
                CaptainSeeSharp
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                ict558 wrote:

                Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it.

                Well, think of it this way. He poses a threat to criminal bankers and insurance companies and all the special interest that run obama. He wants to make sure he gets covered in case there are any "accidents". People like you and wolfbinary are just little liberals lashing out because their stupidity is being rejected.

                Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Majerus

                  It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CaptainSeeSharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Majerus wrote:

                  It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

                  What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.

                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                  M L 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    We have to buy insurance from big bad insurance companies. Apparently it works.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    CaptainSeeSharp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    harold aptroot wrote:

                    We have to buy insurance from big bad insurance companies.

                    Have a cookie.

                    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CaptainSeeSharp

                      Majerus wrote:

                      It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

                      What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.

                      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Majerus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                      Cutting all government programs relating to welfare

                      In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

                      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                      unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruptio

                      Meaningless buzz words.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C CaptainSeeSharp

                        Majerus wrote:

                        It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.

                        What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.

                        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                        Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.

                        So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Majerus

                          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                          Cutting all government programs relating to welfare

                          In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

                          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                          unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruptio

                          Meaningless buzz words.

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          CaptainSeeSharp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Majerus wrote:

                          In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.

                          Cutting all benefits in a responsible manner. Oh and by the way, not everybody gets benefits you know. They think those people are undeserving of them so they don't get any.

                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                            Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.

                            So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CaptainSeeSharp
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Josh Gray wrote:

                            So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

                            The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CaptainSeeSharp

                              Josh Gray wrote:

                              So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?

                              The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                              Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                              What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

                              C J 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                                What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                CaptainSeeSharp
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                                Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                  There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                  There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                                  But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                                  J C W 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                    Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.

                                    What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Joe Simes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Like the bible? Good luck with that? ;)

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                      There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.

                                      But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Joe Simes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      If a person was robbing you at gun point don't you think the robber would think that the cop trying to arrest him was the 'bad guy'? :)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Joe Simes

                                        Like the bible? Good luck with that? ;)

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        Joe Simes wrote:

                                        Like the bible? Good luck with that?

                                        Don't spoil my fun!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • W wolfbinary

                                          http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=529AD458-F859-AAB8-4D74EDC0FFA2DD0D[^] A tea party candidate who ran on repeal of Obama Care because it's a government take over of health care wants to know why he has to wait a month for his. He goes on to say how he's never worked for any employer who doesn't cover you on day one. That's funny I've never worked for anyone who did. Nice, what a tosser.

                                          That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          *Snigger*

                                          Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups