Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Home lab to use ESXi, Hyperv, for 64bit vm's but what computer to use?

Home lab to use ESXi, Hyperv, for 64bit vm's but what computer to use?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionlearning
6 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kmg365
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Had an old Precision 670 lying around tried install of ESXi, then vserver (with 64 bit vm support) under windows 2008, and tried Windows 2008 with hyper-v role. Of course I configured bios to support hyper-threading, but software rejected it. Was eyeballing a used Precision 690, but what the heck, maybe just ask what others are using for "home" or development lab vm servers and how do they like it.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K kmg365

      Had an old Precision 670 lying around tried install of ESXi, then vserver (with 64 bit vm support) under windows 2008, and tried Windows 2008 with hyper-v role. Of course I configured bios to support hyper-threading, but software rejected it. Was eyeballing a used Precision 690, but what the heck, maybe just ask what others are using for "home" or development lab vm servers and how do they like it.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      How much you wanna spend, and does it have to be a laptop?

      FILETIME to time_t
      | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        How much you wanna spend, and does it have to be a laptop?

        FILETIME to time_t
        | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

        K Offline
        K Offline
        kmg365
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks so much for your reply. Don't want to spend that much <1k, can be used machine, will update memory as needed, RAID not required, high performance video not required. Form factor preferred is desktop/workstation. Server is expected only to run about 4-6 vm's at least two of them 64 bit rest 32 bit. Have been using Precision 650's with vmware server for my 32 bit vm's for several years with good success (32 bit host).

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K kmg365

          Thanks so much for your reply. Don't want to spend that much <1k, can be used machine, will update memory as needed, RAID not required, high performance video not required. Form factor preferred is desktop/workstation. Server is expected only to run about 4-6 vm's at least two of them 64 bit rest 32 bit. Have been using Precision 650's with vmware server for my 32 bit vm's for several years with good success (32 bit host).

          P Offline
          P Offline
          peterchen
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Check out the following build: Core i7 Socket 1366 (supporting DDR3), 12GB RAM (3 or six sticks), 2 disks to separate the load. I get that here from not the cheapest supplier at €800 custom built. Scaling up, pick ECC memory, then 24GB (haven't seen suitable 18GB builds) Scaling down: either a simpler Xeon (doesn't save much), or switch to an AMD build. If you don't expect the machines to run concurrently under high load, you should get away easily with an Athlon X4. Generally, I'd invest in RAM rather than RAID.

          FILETIME to time_t
          | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P peterchen

            Check out the following build: Core i7 Socket 1366 (supporting DDR3), 12GB RAM (3 or six sticks), 2 disks to separate the load. I get that here from not the cheapest supplier at €800 custom built. Scaling up, pick ECC memory, then 24GB (haven't seen suitable 18GB builds) Scaling down: either a simpler Xeon (doesn't save much), or switch to an AMD build. If you don't expect the machines to run concurrently under high load, you should get away easily with an Athlon X4. Generally, I'd invest in RAM rather than RAID.

            FILETIME to time_t
            | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

            K Offline
            K Offline
            kmg365
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks you, but was hoping not to build it but rather pick up a used/new machine.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K kmg365

              Thanks you, but was hoping not to build it but rather pick up a used/new machine.

              P Offline
              P Offline
              peterchen
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Ah ok. Over here (Germany) it's common enough to have it built-to-spec if you can name the parts. For the same reaosn, I can't say a lot about off-the-shelf systems.

              FILETIME to time_t
              | FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups