Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Back to those Japanese reactors...

Back to those Japanese reactors...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
htmlcssannouncement
9 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    how the nuclear crisis unfolded [^] "Seismic sensors picked up the earthquake and control rods were automatically inserted into the reactors, halting the fission reaction that is used to produce electricity. This sudden loss of power across Japan's national power grid caused widespread power failures, cutting vital electricity supplies to Fukushima Daiichi. " "An external electricity supply is needed to actively pump cooling water around the 40 year old reactors at Fukushima Daiichi." Doh! "tsunami...sweeping away supply pumps ... and destroying the fuel tanks of the diesel generators, which were positioned above ground at the seaward edge of the site" Doh! "Experts have criticised the positioning of these diesel fuel tanks as they were extremely vulnerable to the wave" Hardly takes an expert... "the plant was designed with defences to withstand an 18 foot tsunami, but the wall of water that hit the power station was 22 feet" Doh! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html#[[^](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-
    Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html# "New Window")] "Nuclear safety specialists said that despite the surveys it appeared officials at Fukushima Daiichi had not considered the scenario that a tsunami might hit the power plant at a time when they would need to use diesel back up generators intended to provide emergency power to the reactor cooling systems. Fuel tanks for the generators, positioned at ground level just yards from the sea front..." Hardly takes an expert... Japan has had many Tsunamis over 8 meters by the way.

    "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and c

    I C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      how the nuclear crisis unfolded [^] "Seismic sensors picked up the earthquake and control rods were automatically inserted into the reactors, halting the fission reaction that is used to produce electricity. This sudden loss of power across Japan's national power grid caused widespread power failures, cutting vital electricity supplies to Fukushima Daiichi. " "An external electricity supply is needed to actively pump cooling water around the 40 year old reactors at Fukushima Daiichi." Doh! "tsunami...sweeping away supply pumps ... and destroying the fuel tanks of the diesel generators, which were positioned above ground at the seaward edge of the site" Doh! "Experts have criticised the positioning of these diesel fuel tanks as they were extremely vulnerable to the wave" Hardly takes an expert... "the plant was designed with defences to withstand an 18 foot tsunami, but the wall of water that hit the power station was 22 feet" Doh! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html#[[^](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-
      Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html# "New Window")] "Nuclear safety specialists said that despite the surveys it appeared officials at Fukushima Daiichi had not considered the scenario that a tsunami might hit the power plant at a time when they would need to use diesel back up generators intended to provide emergency power to the reactor cooling systems. Fuel tanks for the generators, positioned at ground level just yards from the sea front..." Hardly takes an expert... Japan has had many Tsunamis over 8 meters by the way.

      "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and c

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ian Shlasko
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hindsight is 20/20. From what I've been reading, it sounds like the plant could have handled an earthquake OR a tsunami of this magnitude... It's the combination of the two, along with the age of the reactor (Newer ones are more resilient), that's screwing things up. I remember hearing somewhere that the Fukushimi reactors were due to be retired soon... They're obsolete. Basically, the worst earthquake and tsunami in Japan's history hit in the worst possible location. It's not an issue of poor planning or bad design... It's an issue of the engineers expecting a disaster no worse than X, building it to withstand X * 10, and eventually getting hit by X * 100. This is Murphy's Law at work. I think Blue Oyster Cult said it best... "History shows us again and again how nature points out the folly of man."

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ian Shlasko

        Hindsight is 20/20. From what I've been reading, it sounds like the plant could have handled an earthquake OR a tsunami of this magnitude... It's the combination of the two, along with the age of the reactor (Newer ones are more resilient), that's screwing things up. I remember hearing somewhere that the Fukushimi reactors were due to be retired soon... They're obsolete. Basically, the worst earthquake and tsunami in Japan's history hit in the worst possible location. It's not an issue of poor planning or bad design... It's an issue of the engineers expecting a disaster no worse than X, building it to withstand X * 10, and eventually getting hit by X * 100. This is Murphy's Law at work. I think Blue Oyster Cult said it best... "History shows us again and again how nature points out the folly of man."

        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
        Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Ian Shlasko wrote:

        Basically, the worst earthquake and tsunami in Japan's history...

        Not the case Ian. There have been plenty bigger Tsunamis, and I believe one bigger quake. Its easilly googleable, take a look.

        "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

        I 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Ian Shlasko wrote:

          Basically, the worst earthquake and tsunami in Japan's history...

          Not the case Ian. There have been plenty bigger Tsunamis, and I believe one bigger quake. Its easilly googleable, take a look.

          "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

          I Offline
          I Offline
          Ian Shlasko
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          So you're going to ignore the main point and nitpick? Fine. It was the largest earthquake to hit Japan in recorded history, accompanied by a large tsunami. Happy now?

          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
          Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ian Shlasko

            So you're going to ignore the main point and nitpick? Fine. It was the largest earthquake to hit Japan in recorded history, accompanied by a large tsunami. Happy now?

            Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
            Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            So your main point wasnt prefixed with 'Basically'? ;)

            "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

            I 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              So your main point wasnt prefixed with 'Basically'? ;)

              "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ian Shlasko
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              You're ignoring the discussion point, and nitpicking the verbiage. Obviously you have nothing pertinent to say, other than playing Captain Hindsight to the Japanese, so I guess we're done here.

              Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
              Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                You're ignoring the discussion point, and nitpicking the verbiage. Obviously you have nothing pertinent to say, other than playing Captain Hindsight to the Japanese, so I guess we're done here.

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Tsk tsk, what a bad loser you are.:)

                "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  how the nuclear crisis unfolded [^] "Seismic sensors picked up the earthquake and control rods were automatically inserted into the reactors, halting the fission reaction that is used to produce electricity. This sudden loss of power across Japan's national power grid caused widespread power failures, cutting vital electricity supplies to Fukushima Daiichi. " "An external electricity supply is needed to actively pump cooling water around the 40 year old reactors at Fukushima Daiichi." Doh! "tsunami...sweeping away supply pumps ... and destroying the fuel tanks of the diesel generators, which were positioned above ground at the seaward edge of the site" Doh! "Experts have criticised the positioning of these diesel fuel tanks as they were extremely vulnerable to the wave" Hardly takes an expert... "the plant was designed with defences to withstand an 18 foot tsunami, but the wall of water that hit the power station was 22 feet" Doh! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html#[[^](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8392730/Japan-nuclear-crisis-tsunami-study-showed-
                  Fukushima-plant-was-at-risk.html# "New Window")] "Nuclear safety specialists said that despite the surveys it appeared officials at Fukushima Daiichi had not considered the scenario that a tsunami might hit the power plant at a time when they would need to use diesel back up generators intended to provide emergency power to the reactor cooling systems. Fuel tanks for the generators, positioned at ground level just yards from the sea front..." Hardly takes an expert... Japan has had many Tsunamis over 8 meters by the way.

                  "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and c

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Quinn
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  An easy explanation (Japanes with English subtitles) of the dangers of contamination. Nuclear Boy[^]

                  ==================================== Transvestites - Roberts in Disguise! ====================================

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Quinn

                    An easy explanation (Japanes with English subtitles) of the dangers of contamination. Nuclear Boy[^]

                    ==================================== Transvestites - Roberts in Disguise! ====================================

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Damn, that is so trite I almost puked after 30 seconds.

                    "If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip now due to mankind." Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, IPCC "It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you here are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period." Professor Richard Feynman

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups