Happy Memorial Day, America
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
NI was an active service role
Who was the enemy? Ah yes, UK residents. Indeed, sounds like a typical military action.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
bombs guns and paramiltary forces definitately sound like a police situations. and can you give the names of all these people so we can check that they were all UK residents and not born in the south
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
bombs guns and paramiltary forces definitately sound like a police situations. and can you give the names of all these people so we can check that they were all UK residents and not born in the south
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:
bombs guns and paramiltary forces definitately sound like a police situations.
Since its terrorism, yes it does.
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:
and can you give the names of all these people so we can check that they were all UK residents and not born in the south
No, but they were called terrorists and not an army.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Slacker007 wrote:
How would you defend your country
I wouldnt, but I would defend my family and friends to the end.
Slacker007 wrote:
I find that hard to believe
Young men like adventure you know.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
I wouldnt, but I would defend my family and friends to the end.
I don't need to say anything here that you haven't already said yourself.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
Slacker007 wrote:
Their is nobility and honor when you are "defending" your country
Why? I dont live in the country I was born in, why should I put my family at risk to defend it? National pride is worthless. Its nothing. Its as meaningless as being proud of the 20 square feet of soil you were born on.
Slacker007 wrote:
My question to you would be: come up with a better way to defend your country and people without conflict and human sacrifice.
Now you are changing the debate. I stated soldiers are not inherently noble, that much devestation and suffering has been caused by them over the years and that the things praised by Oakman are in fact aspects of free thinking (which I do respect).
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
Now you are changing the debate.
No. I gave you a question that you cannot possibly answer in a million years based on your belief system and that bothers you.
fat_boy wrote:
National pride is worthless. Its nothing. Its as meaningless as being proud of the 20 square feet of soil you were born on.
This is your tell.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
fat_boy wrote:
I wouldnt, but I would defend my family and friends to the end.
I don't need to say anything here that you haven't already said yourself.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
Yes, I dont give two hoots for my country. Why should I? Its just a geographical line on a map little different to anyother. While it has its merits its not exceptional and other countries have theirs. And in many respects its inhabitants are less meritorious than many of its neighnours. Why would you die for your country?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Yes, I dont give two hoots for my country. Why should I? Its just a geographical line on a map little different to anyother. While it has its merits its not exceptional and other countries have theirs. And in many respects its inhabitants are less meritorious than many of its neighnours. Why would you die for your country?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
Why would you die for your country?
So that people like you can play guitar, say what you want without reprise, and to get on your soapbox and preach to the world about your precious weather reports. So that people like you don't live in places like Libya, Syria, and Iran. I would die for my country because my brothers would die for me. If you don't have pride in something greater than yourself then you have nothing.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Now you are changing the debate.
No. I gave you a question that you cannot possibly answer in a million years based on your belief system and that bothers you.
fat_boy wrote:
National pride is worthless. Its nothing. Its as meaningless as being proud of the 20 square feet of soil you were born on.
This is your tell.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
OK, I will answer your question, even though it is not relevant to what I stated. "Their is nobility and honor when you are "defending" your country. Many countries had to defend themselves during WW2 and other conflicts/wars. My question to you would be: come up with a better way to defend your country and people without conflict and human sacrifice." Why is it noble to defend your country? Yes, many people have defended their countries, and died. To what benefit? Why defend your country? What do you hope to gain by maintaining one particular government over another? One particular langauge over another, one particular culture over another?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
OK, I will answer your question, even though it is not relevant to what I stated. "Their is nobility and honor when you are "defending" your country. Many countries had to defend themselves during WW2 and other conflicts/wars. My question to you would be: come up with a better way to defend your country and people without conflict and human sacrifice." Why is it noble to defend your country? Yes, many people have defended their countries, and died. To what benefit? Why defend your country? What do you hope to gain by maintaining one particular government over another? One particular langauge over another, one particular culture over another?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
es, many people have defended their countries, and died. To what benefit?
If England did not defend herself in WW2 for instance then they would have been run over by Nazi Germany and we all know how that would have turned out.
fat_boy wrote:
What do you hope to gain by maintaining one particular government over another?
Democrocy vs. Dictatorship Freedom vs. Slavery This is a no brainer fat_boy. You never answered my question by the way. Look at the question again and answer it...if you can.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Why would you die for your country?
So that people like you can play guitar, say what you want without reprise, and to get on your soapbox and preach to the world about your precious weather reports. So that people like you don't live in places like Libya, Syria, and Iran. I would die for my country because my brothers would die for me. If you don't have pride in something greater than yourself then you have nothing.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
Slacker007 wrote:
So that people like you can play guitar
And I couldnt do that if I were invaded by say, the Germans?
Slacker007 wrote:
say what you want without reprise
Can I? Did you see how the Police treated the WWII POW vets who protested the arrival of the Japanese Emperor in the UK?
Slacker007 wrote:
and to get on your soapbox and preach to the world about your precious weather reports.
Which can be done from any country with an internet connection.
Slacker007 wrote:
So that people like you don't live in places like Libya, Syria, and Iran.
Now thats better. Defending against a physical threat or against a repressive ideology is another matter.
Slacker007 wrote:
If you don't have pride in something greater than yourself then you have nothing.
I have no pride in myself either. :)
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
fat_boy wrote:
es, many people have defended their countries, and died. To what benefit?
If England did not defend herself in WW2 for instance then they would have been run over by Nazi Germany and we all know how that would have turned out.
fat_boy wrote:
What do you hope to gain by maintaining one particular government over another?
Democrocy vs. Dictatorship Freedom vs. Slavery This is a no brainer fat_boy. You never answered my question by the way. Look at the question again and answer it...if you can.
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
Slacker007 wrote:
If England did not defend herself in WW2 for instance then they would have been run over by Nazi Germany and we all know how that would have turned out.
They would speak a different Germanic language to the one they do today. They would have a strong manufacturing industry. They would not have lost the Empire (in the case of WWI). The cold war might not have happened. We wouldnt have a creeping Islamification of Europe. ...
Slacker007 wrote:
Democrocy vs. Dictatorship
You are assuming that the attacking country is a dictatorship, why? And that they would enslave the people. The UK attacked Iraq, did it enslave the people? Oh, and using Nazi Germany is Godwins law abuse.:) Why not use the Dutch invasion of Britain circa 1720 by William of Orange and 20,000 Dutch troops. Whats your take on that. Worth dying for?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Slacker007 wrote:
If England did not defend herself in WW2 for instance then they would have been run over by Nazi Germany and we all know how that would have turned out.
They would speak a different Germanic language to the one they do today. They would have a strong manufacturing industry. They would not have lost the Empire (in the case of WWI). The cold war might not have happened. We wouldnt have a creeping Islamification of Europe. ...
Slacker007 wrote:
Democrocy vs. Dictatorship
You are assuming that the attacking country is a dictatorship, why? And that they would enslave the people. The UK attacked Iraq, did it enslave the people? Oh, and using Nazi Germany is Godwins law abuse.:) Why not use the Dutch invasion of Britain circa 1720 by William of Orange and 20,000 Dutch troops. Whats your take on that. Worth dying for?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
My debate with you on this is over. I foresee this turning more into an argument than a debate in the near future. I respect your opinions and beliefs although I do not agree with any of them. ;)
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
My debate with you on this is over. I foresee this turning more into an argument than a debate in the near future. I respect your opinions and beliefs although I do not agree with any of them. ;)
-- ** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter. ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
Slacker007 wrote:
My debate with you on this is over
'Cos you lost? ;P Here is the way I see it: In the UK we were pre Celts. Then the Celts invaded, we were happy to call ourselves Celtic. Then the Romans came and gave us Latin and education, trade, and opportunity. We were happy to call ourselves Romano Celts. And spoke Welsh. Then the Saxons arrived. And we were happy to ally ourselves with Arthur, the heroic Celt who battled the Saxons. He lost. And we learnt Saxon. Then the Danes arrived, and we were happy to call ourselves Saxons and suport the heroic Saxon King Alfred. He got a draw. And we blended Old Norse into our language. And we were happy to think of ourselves under Canut, the Danish king of the Danish-Anglo territory. Then the Normans arrived, damn French! And we pittied Harold, who having just sbeaten off even more Danes two weeks earlier, got an aroow in the eye. And we added Frenmch to the morass of our language. And we got modern English, and we were happy. Then we got fed up with Catholics, killed our king, put another one back, got fed up and put a Dutch man on the throne, who invaded England and fought his way to London. Some were happy, the Proitestants, the Catholics were mightly pissed off. (Then he invaded Ireland and cause a whole hell of a lot of problems.) Where have we been worse off for being invaded? What woud have been the point of dying to stop it? At every change we have alligned ourselves with the new power. If you are English, why dont you still hate the Saxons and their filthy Germanic language and love the Brythoinc Celtic, as do the Welsh, today? :) So you see if the Germans took the UK in 1920 so what? Would I care today?
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Why the 1 votes? The principle way I can distinguish the Canadian and American accents are the way Canadians say 'out'. POinting this out doesnt deserve a down vote though! :)
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
Why the 1 votes?
And what makes you think it was me? I don't 1-vote people for silly things like that. Now, some of your OTHER posts in this thread may deserve 1-votes, but I haven't contributed mine.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
fat_boy wrote:
Why the 1 votes?
And what makes you think it was me? I don't 1-vote people for silly things like that. Now, some of your OTHER posts in this thread may deserve 1-votes, but I haven't contributed mine.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Ian Shlasko wrote:
And what makes you think it was me?
You must be paranoid, I was wondering why you got 1 votes. :)
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
And what makes you think it was me?
You must be paranoid, I was wondering why you got 1 votes. :)
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
Oh, heh... Just shows how little attention I've been paying to this forum lately...
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
yawwwn
The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.
-
yawwwn
The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.
Aw, why'd you delete it? You 'tyupe' such brilliant insults, don't you know? Never fear, though - I shall reproduce it here: "another ignorant peasant child with dung on your booties. You reveal your ignorance with every word you tyupe." I don't even need to comment on it. You've insulted yourself far worse than I ever could.
-
yawwwn
The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.
I know you're there, by the way.
-
Dont bother trying to explain subtlety to CP. Half the people here are utterly incapable of comprehending it.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
fat_boy wrote:
Half the people here are utterly incapable of comprehending it.
Bit unfair, most seem bright and pleasant enough. I was surprised at DD though, shouting abuse like some old derelict released for 'Care in the Community'. It invites scorn rather than the respect he deserves.
A Coward and a Fool. Dalek Dave & Hokum (So it must be so, alas.)
-
fat_boy wrote:
Half the people here are utterly incapable of comprehending it.
Bit unfair, most seem bright and pleasant enough. I was surprised at DD though, shouting abuse like some old derelict released for 'Care in the Community'. It invites scorn rather than the respect he deserves.
A Coward and a Fool. Dalek Dave & Hokum (So it must be so, alas.)
ict558 wrote:
Bit unfair, most seem bright and pleasant enough.
Hmm, depends on what you post about. :)
ict558 wrote:
I was surprised at DD though
He does get like this from time to time.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost