Is it just me?
-
Garth J Lancaster wrote:
the whole lot of them should be signing up for welfare
I certainly hope that wouldn't be the case. Assuming they haven't p*ssed away their hordes of money that's probably not trickling down, they probably don't even need to work, save the drive of greed. I mean, why does Murdoch keep buying up all these other media companies? Because he thinks he can make them better news outlets? Doubtful - he owns Fox "News" afterall.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Program Manager II Visual Studio Professional Deployment Experience Microsoft [My Articles] [My Blog]
no, I didnt mean 'the common worker', I meant the mgmt levels - the accountability and loss of work should flow uphill - but like sh*t, guess which way it goes (rhetorical) 'g'
-
no, I didnt mean 'the common worker', I meant the mgmt levels - the accountability and loss of work should flow uphill - but like sh*t, guess which way it goes (rhetorical) 'g'
Obviously :), given I said "hordes of money" which we all know the worker doesn't make. :mad:
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Program Manager Visual Studio Professional Deployment Experience Microsoft [My Articles] [My Blog]
-
Plus as an added Brucy Bonus she is leading the investigation into wrong doings by they paper during her time in charge of it. Now their's a woman who knows where the bodies are buried
pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]
pseudonym67 wrote:
Plus as an added Brucy Bonus she is leading the investigation into wrong doings by they paper during her time in charge of it.
Now their's a woman who knows where the bodies are buriedAnd who will suffer a case of selected amnesia when required. :mad: I mean, can she really be objective into looking for wrong-doing when she was in charge? That's like asking Gordon Brown to lead an investigation into why the banks went bust on his watch; it just ain't going to happen objectively.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
-
Plus as an added Brucy Bonus she is leading the investigation into wrong doings by they paper during her time in charge of it. Now their's a woman who knows where the bodies are buried
pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]
Rebekah Wade[^] was in charge of the NotW, Rebekah Brooks[^] will be investigating. As The Now Show[^] said " a completely differenet name, so that is OK then, and nobody knows Rebekah Wade like Rebekah Brookes" :)
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that Rupert Murdoch is giving Rebekah Brooks one? Or is it the other way round. I honestly can't see how this woman has still managed to keep her job.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
Murdoch is famously loyal to those who are loyal to him. It is more likely to be that than the (probably actionable, and we know he has a lot of lawyers) suggestion that he is having an extra-marital affair...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
Ben Breeg wrote:
you can't afford to be too choosy!
I suspect there's nothing much that Rupert Murdoch can't afford.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
That's what I thought about Bill Clinton. Then I saw pics of Monica. I would think that the supposed "Leader of the Free World" could do a bit better... On second thought, it is a step up from what he married. X|
Will Rogers never met me.
-
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that Rupert Murdoch is giving Rebekah Brooks one? Or is it the other way round. I honestly can't see how this woman has still managed to keep her job.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
Does no-one else think she just might know where all the bodies are buried and he's just vicariously protecting his son and himself?
Rhys "I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees"
-
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that Rupert Murdoch is giving Rebekah Brooks one? Or is it the other way round. I honestly can't see how this woman has still managed to keep her job.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
-
Does no-one else think she just might know where all the bodies are buried and he's just vicariously protecting his son and himself?
Rhys "I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees"
-
pseudonym67 wrote:
Plus as an added Brucy Bonus she is leading the investigation into wrong doings by they paper during her time in charge of it.
Now their's a woman who knows where the bodies are buriedAnd who will suffer a case of selected amnesia when required. :mad: I mean, can she really be objective into looking for wrong-doing when she was in charge? That's like asking Gordon Brown to lead an investigation into why the banks went bust on his watch; it just ain't going to happen objectively.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
Ben Breeg wrote:
I mean, can she really be objective into looking for wrong-doing when she was in charge?
Why not? If a cashier is stealing money from the cash register then would you claim that the manager of that store should not investigate? And if the cashier is guilty of theft does that make the manager guilty of theft as well?
-
Ben Breeg wrote:
I mean, can she really be objective into looking for wrong-doing when she was in charge?
Why not? If a cashier is stealing money from the cash register then would you claim that the manager of that store should not investigate? And if the cashier is guilty of theft does that make the manager guilty of theft as well?
jschell wrote:
If a cashier is stealing money from the cash register then would you claim that the manager of that store should not investigate?
Yes, most definitely if the manager had asked or knew that the cashier was stealing money and did nothing about it.
You do trust me, don't you? IF EVERY nation gets the leaders it deserves, what in God's name have we done to deserve Francis Urquhart?
