Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why be intolerant of dumb questions?

Why be intolerant of dumb questions?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionc++architecture
66 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dave Kreskowiak

    For me, it has nothing to do with not being able to write code, but everything to do with the OP not being able to communicate with another human being. They have no clue how to ask a question and just assume that whoever reads it can read their mind to get all the context information. "My codes wont work" or "I get an error, what's the solution" (almost verbatim, not a summary example!) just doesn't cut it. OPs don't bother posting the error message and just assume that you can see their screen. They have no idea how to communicate an idea or something they see on screen at a basic level. If you ask them questions for context or even for just the error message and the code snippet that threw it they either get all pissy and suck their underwear up their own ass because you haven't given them an answer, or just ignore the responses entirely. I've been around here for quite a long time and I've watched the quality of questions just plummet with the rise of offshoring/outsourcing/whatever-you-want-to-call-it. Being able to communicate effectively comes down to a basic education problem and there's nothing we can do about that.

    A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
    Dave Kreskowiak

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Maunder
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    That's perfectly understandable. Does this provide a justification to be rude?

    cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nish Nishant

      Chris Maunder wrote:

      Why be intolerant of dumb questions?

      Because this site has promoted that very thing for years here. Abusive, mocking, scornful replies that are way out of line have always been voted up, and cheered not just in the programming forums but also in the Lounge. I include myself in this list too although for at least 3 years now, I have made a very conscious effort to not only be tolerant of dumb questions but to go out of my way to aggressively respond to people who reply rudely (on occasions against some very popular members/personal friends). In the past it was not this big a problem, because the percentage or rather number of people asking dumb questions were too small to notice. But the site grew fast, too fast for some people, and now there are dozens of dumb questions asked every day so these people (many of them active CPians of many years) don't know any other way than to respond rudely. I am not sure how it's gratifying but I guess it gives them a kick for a few seconds or minutes. You (Chris) can make a change if you strongly insist that people put a stop to it. It’s your website. So it should be your responsibility to make sure you don’t silently endorse a culture of boorishness and uncalled-for contempt. Side-note: you just gotta respect John (SOP) here. For a guy whose first instinct is to hit back verbally, he is one of the politest guys in the programming forums. He is intolerant of idiots in the Lounge, but I haven’t seen him reply in an offensive and off-topic way even to some of the dumbest and haziest questions posted here.

      Regards, Nish


      My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Maunder
      wrote on last edited by
      #62

      It's difficult to make something idiot proof due to the creativity of idiots. However, it is definitely up to me to at least provide disincentives. Well said, Nish.

      cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Maunder

        Walt Fair, Jr. wrote:

        but I'm not sure I agree with your premise.

        Which bit?

        cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dr Walt Fair PE
        wrote on last edited by
        #63

        Chris Maunder wrote:

        given the premise that if someone can't be bothered to phrase a decent question, they probably won't be receptive to abuse and sarcasm,

        I think some, when met with some level of abuse or sarcasm, just go away and never post again. It would be interesting to see how many of the 8,0430952 members have posted 1 or 2 questions, no other messages, and not signed in again. I'm not saying I agree with dishing out abuse, etc., but I certainly understand the frustration of wanting to truly help people, then dealing with the reality that some won't even use Google or take the time to think about their own problem.

        CQ de W5ALT

        Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nish Nishant

          Chris Maunder wrote:

          Why be intolerant of dumb questions?

          Because this site has promoted that very thing for years here. Abusive, mocking, scornful replies that are way out of line have always been voted up, and cheered not just in the programming forums but also in the Lounge. I include myself in this list too although for at least 3 years now, I have made a very conscious effort to not only be tolerant of dumb questions but to go out of my way to aggressively respond to people who reply rudely (on occasions against some very popular members/personal friends). In the past it was not this big a problem, because the percentage or rather number of people asking dumb questions were too small to notice. But the site grew fast, too fast for some people, and now there are dozens of dumb questions asked every day so these people (many of them active CPians of many years) don't know any other way than to respond rudely. I am not sure how it's gratifying but I guess it gives them a kick for a few seconds or minutes. You (Chris) can make a change if you strongly insist that people put a stop to it. It’s your website. So it should be your responsibility to make sure you don’t silently endorse a culture of boorishness and uncalled-for contempt. Side-note: you just gotta respect John (SOP) here. For a guy whose first instinct is to hit back verbally, he is one of the politest guys in the programming forums. He is intolerant of idiots in the Lounge, but I haven’t seen him reply in an offensive and off-topic way even to some of the dumbest and haziest questions posted here.

          Regards, Nish


          My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

          W Offline
          W Offline
          Wayne Gaylard
          wrote on last edited by
          #64

          What an excellent synopsis! This surely has got to be the main contributor to the sarcasm and scathing replies on this site. There needs to be more people like you on this site.

          Live for today. Plan for tomorrow. Party tonight!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            I think it's just something you have to put up with Chris.

            I strongly disagree. I don't see that any of us need put up with it. 2 things I need to complete, and then the next project is tackling this issue in a very direct way. I think those who follow their points will be the most likely to see the merit of being polite, reporting, or walking away. Frankly, I'm sick of the arrogance I see displayed by people who don't have the courtesy to stop and think about others.

            cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

            W Offline
            W Offline
            Wayne Gaylard
            wrote on last edited by
            #65

            Chris Maunder wrote:

            he next project is tackling this issue in a very direct way.

            Excellent. This is what it is going to take. Action from you and other Code Project management. I look forward to what you guys come up with.

            Live for today. Plan for tomorrow. Party tonight!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Maunder

              That's perfectly understandable. Does this provide a justification to be rude?

              cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dave Kreskowiak
              wrote on last edited by
              #66

              Nope.

              A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
              Dave Kreskowiak

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups