Regarding the lowest member levels achievable...
-
Just spotted this and was wondering if it was intentional and if so, why??? Currently you can be 'underwater' if you lose sufficient points to have reached the int32 minimum value - I think anyone who manages that should instantly become advertised on the home page, just because that would be an astounding achievement to lose that man points...I mean really, how annoying would you have to be??!! :wtf:
-
Just spotted this and was wondering if it was intentional and if so, why??? Currently you can be 'underwater' if you lose sufficient points to have reached the int32 minimum value - I think anyone who manages that should instantly become advertised on the home page, just because that would be an astounding achievement to lose that man points...I mean really, how annoying would you have to be??!! :wtf:
Edward Nutting wrote:
Currently you can be 'underwater' if you lose sufficient points to have reached the int32 minimum value
Actually, you can be under water for any negative value. If you notice, the chart sets up each value as a minimum. Under water starts at the minimum possible value and goes all the way to -1, and at 0 a new designation is assigned.
Martin Fowler wrote:
Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
-
Just spotted this and was wondering if it was intentional and if so, why??? Currently you can be 'underwater' if you lose sufficient points to have reached the int32 minimum value - I think anyone who manages that should instantly become advertised on the home page, just because that would be an astounding achievement to lose that man points...I mean really, how annoying would you have to be??!! :wtf:
Edward Nutting wrote:
just because that would be an astounding achievement to lose that man points
To lose "many" points or just "man" points? :-D
Just along for the ride. "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
-
Edward Nutting wrote:
just because that would be an astounding achievement to lose that man points
To lose "many" points or just "man" points? :-D
Just along for the ride. "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
Slacker007 wrote:
just "man" points
Just? JUST‽‽‽ Dude, you just lost some man points. Justice must be served.
Martin Fowler wrote:
Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
-
Slacker007 wrote:
just "man" points
Just? JUST‽‽‽ Dude, you just lost some man points. Justice must be served.
Martin Fowler wrote:
Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
Apologies for the typo... not quite sure what to make of the rest... :doh:
-
Edward Nutting wrote:
Currently you can be 'underwater' if you lose sufficient points to have reached the int32 minimum value
Actually, you can be under water for any negative value. If you notice, the chart sets up each value as a minimum. Under water starts at the minimum possible value and goes all the way to -1, and at 0 a new designation is assigned.
Martin Fowler wrote:
Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
Aah...yes I hadn't thought about it that logically...sorry.. I assumed the table would give the highest value below 0 that any negative level would require to be less than. i.e. it would say -1 for under water, meaning -1 or below would result iin the lowest level. Seemed to make sense form a human perspective :~