Programming isn't hard...
-
Not really - just use names that say what they are. If you are trying to think up polite ways to call them after your ex-girlfriends, then yes, I can see where you might have difficulty. But if a class is meant to handle user information, then I would probably call it "UserInfo" rather than "RurikoPityHerVisaRanOutAndSheHadToGoBackToJapan" or "MarionWentAllWierdAndBecameBornAgain". Similarly with open file dialog references - I generally call them "ofd" for the short time they are in existance. :laugh:
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
Allright, here it goes. I have an Object of any type that needs to have something done with/upon it. What is this Object called? Simply
objseems to easy.objToDoSomethingWithis to long.handledObjsounds as if something has already been done with it.handlingObjis just weird.objToHandle, well that might cause confusion. I could replaceobjwithitem, but that does not solve anything. Perhaps I should not be thinking about this at the end of the day. Or perhaps I should just go withobj... Oritem. Choices, choices... :sigh:It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
-
Is that a quote from the Guardians Saga? I do note however, that when you have moved all these items into the new ocean, you then discard the reference and effectively leave them adrift waiting for the Dark Lord G'Bge Cll'ctr to come and find them...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
Uh, no.... Not a Trekkie[^], are you?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Thinking of names for your classes and variables, THAT's hard... :doh: Frustration #1 of the evening... :sigh:
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
(Hands you 100 001 baby names book) this should help. :) Append] this kinda goes along with the C# numeration and collections example where by the authur used "MyCult" as an example (great idea by the way).
///////////////// -Negative, I am a meat popsicle.
-
Is that a quote from the Guardians Saga? I do note however, that when you have moved all these items into the new ocean, you then discard the reference and effectively leave them adrift waiting for the Dark Lord G'Bge Cll'ctr to come and find them...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
OriginalGriff wrote:
Is that a quote from the Guardians Saga?
Nope. Star Trek: The Next Generation [^] reference.
-
Hey, be nice... Some of us made it to the second line :-D
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Yes, but how long did it take? And this is not even code. If reading this in code would take you as long as reading this in plain text the code would not even compile anymore on the computers that, by that time, have become modern ;p
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
-
Uh, no.... Not a Trekkie[^], are you?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Sometimes - but Wesley Crusher scarred me so badly I couldn't watch TNG so the references didn't mean anything.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
i name every CWaitCursor i create the same thing: bob. true story.
b
obj? :)It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
-
Sometimes - but Wesley Crusher scarred me so badly I couldn't watch TNG so the references didn't mean anything.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
Oh, come on... The character may have been a bit silly, but Wil Wheaton is cool... Gotta respect any Hollywood actor who's an active member of Slashdot.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Yes, but how long did it take? And this is not even code. If reading this in code would take you as long as reading this in plain text the code would not even compile anymore on the computers that, by that time, have become modern ;p
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
Um, a few seconds... It was something about bags... After a few lines, I realized it wasn't worth continuing :)
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Allright, here it goes. I have an Object of any type that needs to have something done with/upon it. What is this Object called? Simply
objseems to easy.objToDoSomethingWithis to long.handledObjsounds as if something has already been done with it.handlingObjis just weird.objToHandle, well that might cause confusion. I could replaceobjwithitem, but that does not solve anything. Perhaps I should not be thinking about this at the end of the day. Or perhaps I should just go withobj... Oritem. Choices, choices... :sigh:It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
-
Oh, come on... The character may have been a bit silly, but Wil Wheaton is cool... Gotta respect any Hollywood actor who's an active member of Slashdot.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)The character should have been fed to rabid Tribbles at birth. Or Lieutenant Yar if health and safety rules forbid rabid Tribbles on Star Fleet vessels. Unlikely, I admit - Star Fleet don't seem to have any truck with H&S legislation, or they wouldn't fill all the computer consoles with semtex...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
Thinking of names for your classes and variables, THAT's hard... :doh: Frustration #1 of the evening... :sigh:
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
I used to name all my functions in alphabetical order with the letters of the alphabet i.e. A(), B(), C(), D() etc. in the order of creation. But for some strange reason my boss went really mental about it questioning my professionalism and sanity and screaming the he is gonna do anatomically impossible things with me and the keyboard if I don’t start naming the functions with a meaningful words. So now I'm naming them: Alpha(), Bravo(), Charlie(), Delta(), Echo(), Foxtrot() etc. After that I’m closing them in regions named “A2C”, “D2O” and “P2Z”. It’s pretty, readable and intuitive. I hope my boss will be happy know.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
I'd forgotten just how impenetrably Dijkstra wrote: I needed a good long run up to read him when I was a student. And several large drinks afterwards. Mind you, at least he didn't make you fall asleep like Knuth did... But that could have been the large drinks!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
Yeah, it's true. The theme of many of Dijkstra's arguments was that natural language is a poor vehicle for discussing problems in computation, and his writing style seems at times to be intended to prove this assertion! I have read through his "Meaningful Identifiers" paper, though, and in summary, his basic point seems to be that attempting to give variables descriptive natural language names is a trap. A natural language name can never truly express what a variable is, fundamentally, or what it does, only provide hints. Because these natural language names are subjective and ambiguous, a danger occurs when people (e.g. maintenance programmers) attempt to extract meaning from them instead of just reading the code, e.g.
#define max_subscript 4
//...
int some_array[max_subscript];
The declaration at the end of this snippet implies that the name
max_subscriptis actually an inaccurate description. The real maximum subscript is 3. But in order to detect this, one must 1) be familiar with C syntax and 2) actually see and consider this declaration (versus simply seeing the incorrectly named constant used elsewhere). As a result, we would be better off ifmax_subscriptwere simply calledM(oriLikeFishTacos,brett_favre, etc.) Dijkstra's argument seems sound, but in practice I do give my identifiers meaningful natural-language names, because people expect this. It's not difficult to extend Dijkstra's argument about identifier names to comments as well... consider the following:void a_function()
{
int * a = new int; //Allocate "a" on the stack//...
}//All that stuff we allocated on the stack gets cleaned up automatically here
Again, this is a simplistic example (that
intisn't on the stack and it won't get cleaned up automatically). Hopefully, though, the message is clear: we'd actually be better off without those supposedly helpful comments. As an experienced programmer, I have suffered through a few scenarios where an inaccurate comment actually did slow me down. However, I must be careful to point out that none of these extreme positions reflect my own personal programming practice... (although I do think that developers should at least acquaint themselves with Dijkstra's argument). -
You mean my code should be gibberish and no one should ever be able to read past the first line? X|
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
This is Dijkstra's opinion, not mine! But I think he would tell you that mathematicians get by with X, Y, theta, pi, etc., and that programming is just a species of mathematics. After all, Einstein didn't discover that realEnergy = realMass * [ (squareRootOfTheSpeedOfLight)² ] Rather, he was just fine with E=mc², and (amazingly, if all you know is programming) people still embraced his findings.
-
The character should have been fed to rabid Tribbles at birth. Or Lieutenant Yar if health and safety rules forbid rabid Tribbles on Star Fleet vessels. Unlikely, I admit - Star Fleet don't seem to have any truck with H&S legislation, or they wouldn't fill all the computer consoles with semtex...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
OriginalGriff wrote:
Star Fleet don't seem to have any truck with H&S legislation, or they wouldn't fill all the computer consoles with semtex...
Yeah, I always wondered why it was that they could manage matter-energy conversion, subspace communication, and warp drive... But couldn't seem to figure out how to make a surge protector or... *gasp*... a FUSE!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
What kind of object is it? ...if it's to remain abstract... then
objseems good enough for me.I just went for
item. And yes, it is to remain abstract. It is an Interface Method that has a T (as in generic) as a parameter. That is the reason I did not want to go forobj. Because the parameter is of type T, which is more specific than an Object.It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
-
This is Dijkstra's opinion, not mine! But I think he would tell you that mathematicians get by with X, Y, theta, pi, etc., and that programming is just a species of mathematics. After all, Einstein didn't discover that realEnergy = realMass * [ (squareRootOfTheSpeedOfLight)² ] Rather, he was just fine with E=mc², and (amazingly, if all you know is programming) people still embraced his findings.
Dijkstra didn't have to debug an option valuation model written in C++ by a math PhD... True story... Almost every variable in the Black-Scholes calculation was one or two letters long, and none of them had any relevance to what they represented. Don't get me wrong... It (mostly) worked, and it was fast, but... Ow, my eyes!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Thinking of names for your classes and variables, THAT's hard... :doh: Frustration #1 of the evening... :sigh:
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{}
I am currently in the fourth phase of naming. Phase I: Short undescriptive names; great for college kids and prima donas Phase II: Names of nouns that are easy to remember but have no bearing on code Phase III: Logical naming based on context, type, and use Phase IV: Whatever you feel like because you are in charge. Don't worry, naming gets easier with time.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
-
Yeah, it's true. The theme of many of Dijkstra's arguments was that natural language is a poor vehicle for discussing problems in computation, and his writing style seems at times to be intended to prove this assertion! I have read through his "Meaningful Identifiers" paper, though, and in summary, his basic point seems to be that attempting to give variables descriptive natural language names is a trap. A natural language name can never truly express what a variable is, fundamentally, or what it does, only provide hints. Because these natural language names are subjective and ambiguous, a danger occurs when people (e.g. maintenance programmers) attempt to extract meaning from them instead of just reading the code, e.g.
#define max_subscript 4
//...
int some_array[max_subscript];
The declaration at the end of this snippet implies that the name
max_subscriptis actually an inaccurate description. The real maximum subscript is 3. But in order to detect this, one must 1) be familiar with C syntax and 2) actually see and consider this declaration (versus simply seeing the incorrectly named constant used elsewhere). As a result, we would be better off ifmax_subscriptwere simply calledM(oriLikeFishTacos,brett_favre, etc.) Dijkstra's argument seems sound, but in practice I do give my identifiers meaningful natural-language names, because people expect this. It's not difficult to extend Dijkstra's argument about identifier names to comments as well... consider the following:void a_function()
{
int * a = new int; //Allocate "a" on the stack//...
}//All that stuff we allocated on the stack gets cleaned up automatically here
Again, this is a simplistic example (that
intisn't on the stack and it won't get cleaned up automatically). Hopefully, though, the message is clear: we'd actually be better off without those supposedly helpful comments. As an experienced programmer, I have suffered through a few scenarios where an inaccurate comment actually did slow me down. However, I must be careful to point out that none of these extreme positions reflect my own personal programming practice... (although I do think that developers should at least acquaint themselves with Dijkstra's argument)._beauw_ wrote:
The declaration at the end of this snippet implies that the name
max_subscriptis actually an inaccurate description.I would agree, but that isn't a fault of the naming convention. Rather, it is a fault of the coder: max_subscript is wrong, and doesn't describe what the constant is used for: max_elements_count would have been better (or max_whatevertheheckthearrayholds_count even better still) For me, the problem is I grew up with Fortran, where a line of code was 80 characters, and variables were a max of six characters. Generally names were impenetrable, short and unrelated to the use. So, when I can I use "proper" names for things, because it means I can read the code in six months time and stand a vague chance of working out how it works. :laugh:
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
Dijkstra didn't have to debug an option valuation model written in C++ by a math PhD... True story... Almost every variable in the Black-Scholes calculation was one or two letters long, and none of them had any relevance to what they represented. Don't get me wrong... It (mostly) worked, and it was fast, but... Ow, my eyes!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)When Black and Scholes were figuring out how to value options, though, they probably were using one- and two-letter variable names, and they ended up winning the Nobel Prize. Maybe the difference is that people don't have to "maintain" mathematics. There was a movie where Leo DiCaprio (or maybe Matt Damon?) was a maintenance man who did mathematics... but that's a different story. :-D
