Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study

Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncementlearningworkspace
206 Posts 11 Posters 3.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    People haven't really been able to supplement vitamins for centuries since pills to do that have only been around since 1930 or so. Why do I waste my time arguing with you?

    - F

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    You are so ignorant. The British Navy has been handing out lime juice to avert scurvy for centuries. You dont even know enought to argue a point you should know something about, provided you really are an MD and not some angry little twerp working in some lab for a drugs company. And then you make a fool of yourslef by making a stupid statement like this!

    ============================== Nothing to say.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Ascorbic acid, scurvy? Used for centuries. But no, according to mr know it all MD Fistedchuff thats all a lie! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

      ============================== Nothing to say.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #176

      Erudite__Eric wrote:

      Ascorbic acid, scurvy? Used for centuries.
       
      But no, according to mr know it all MD Fistedchuff thats all a lie!

      Uh, I would've read what Fisticuffs actually said before responding with this. :~

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        All about equally poorly effective. Congratulations, chiropractic: you perform about as poorly as six other less expensive things. None of which are narcotics, FYI. Back pain usually goes away on its own and people usually seek treatment at the greatest epoch of pain, leading quite easily to a fake treatment effect. Most of those people your parents "treated" got better because of a complicated placebo effect and a regression to the mean. I can guarantee they never actually treated any organic disease in the back by "adjusting" people. From the sum total of scientific studies on chiropractic and lower back manipulation (which itself is pretty scant), that's very clear.

        - F

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #177

        Mr Fistedchuff, vs many thousands of happy patients.... Hmm, not too hard to know the outcome here...

        ============================== Nothing to say.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S soap brain

          Erudite__Eric wrote:

          Vitamins? Really?
           
          Ever heard of the British Navy handing out lime juice to avert scurvy since what, 1750 or some such?

          How about rickets and Vitamine D deficciency? You must of heard of these surely.

          Too little being bad does not imply that the more you have the greater the benefit. If you're not vitamin deficient, then vitamin supplements are at the very least pointless, and I've heard that in some cases they've even been implicated with a higher mortality rate.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #178

          Yeah of course, but calling them crap was Fistedchuffs statement, which clearly they are not, given Vitamin C's virtual mirraculous cure in the British Navy centuries ago. You know thats why the British are called Limeys? Because they were given lime juice?

          ============================== Nothing to say.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S soap brain

            Erudite__Eric wrote:

            Ascorbic acid, scurvy? Used for centuries.
             
            But no, according to mr know it all MD Fistedchuff thats all a lie!

            Uh, I would've read what Fisticuffs actually said before responding with this. :~

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #179

            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

            Uh, I would've read what Fisticuffs actually said before responding with this

            He called vitamins crapo, and then said they werent 'discovered' until 1925. (Discovered like some sort of lost land or something aparently...). No, they werent called vitamins untill 1825 but the existence and diseases caused by 'vitamin' deficiiency has been known about for centuries.

            ============================== Nothing to say.

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              Uh, I would've read what Fisticuffs actually said before responding with this

              He called vitamins crapo, and then said they werent 'discovered' until 1925. (Discovered like some sort of lost land or something aparently...). No, they werent called vitamins untill 1825 but the existence and diseases caused by 'vitamin' deficiiency has been known about for centuries.

              ============================== Nothing to say.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #180

              Erudite__Eric wrote:

              He called vitamins crapo, and then said they werent 'discovered' until 1925. (Discovered like some sort of lost land or something aparently...).

              He said that vitamin pills weren't invented until around 1930.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Yeah of course, but calling them crap was Fistedchuffs statement, which clearly they are not, given Vitamin C's virtual mirraculous cure in the British Navy centuries ago. You know thats why the British are called Limeys? Because they were given lime juice?

                ============================== Nothing to say.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                soap brain
                wrote on last edited by
                #181

                Erudite__Eric wrote:

                Yeah of course, but calling them crap was Fistedchuffs statement, which clearly they are not, given Vitamin C's virtual mirraculous cure in the British Navy centuries ago. You know thats why the British are called Limeys? Because they were given lime juice?

                . . . You're trying to explain to an M.D. the value of vitamins? The cure for a vitamin deficiency is something with that vitamin. They're NOT, as far as I know, the cure for anything else.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S soap brain

                  Erudite__Eric wrote:

                  He called vitamins crapo, and then said they werent 'discovered' until 1925. (Discovered like some sort of lost land or something aparently...).

                  He said that vitamin pills weren't invented until around 1930.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #182

                  He said that to imply that before then people werent able to take extra vitamines thus refuting my statement that vitamins had been known about for centuries and had been used sucessfully to trreat scurvy refuting his argument that vitamins are crap. That is the train of his deranged arguing, if you are going to jump in half way, keep track of the whole thing. Of course he is also wrong, you can take vitamins through food in general. Is not lime juice a supliment? The British Navy used it expressly as that. Yest accordijng to Fistedchuff a supliment has to be a pill. Typical doctor, obsessed with his own superiority but actually intelectually limited and logically fallacious.

                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S soap brain

                    Erudite__Eric wrote:

                    Yeah of course, but calling them crap was Fistedchuffs statement, which clearly they are not, given Vitamin C's virtual mirraculous cure in the British Navy centuries ago. You know thats why the British are called Limeys? Because they were given lime juice?

                    . . . You're trying to explain to an M.D. the value of vitamins? The cure for a vitamin deficiency is something with that vitamin. They're NOT, as far as I know, the cure for anything else.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #183

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    They're NOT, as far as I know, the cure for anything else.

                    Who the fuck said they are? He called them crap, I pointed out his stupidity. (Oh, you know that many mass produced vegetables have less nutrients than organically grown ones? No doubt the utter basic fact of that, which can be proved through chemical analysis, will be denied by Fistedchuff no doubt) Anyway, I am off for a coffe down at the cafe,. back in 40... :)

                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                      They're NOT, as far as I know, the cure for anything else.

                      Who the fuck said they are? He called them crap, I pointed out his stupidity. (Oh, you know that many mass produced vegetables have less nutrients than organically grown ones? No doubt the utter basic fact of that, which can be proved through chemical analysis, will be denied by Fistedchuff no doubt) Anyway, I am off for a coffe down at the cafe,. back in 40... :)

                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      soap brain
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #184

                      Erudite__Eric wrote:

                      Who the f*** said they are? He called them crap, I pointed out his stupidity.

                      That's a very unsophisticated attempt at understanding what he said. When a chiropractor sells vitamins to a patient for something other than vitamin deficiency, chiropractic is garbage.

                      Erudite__Eric wrote:

                      (Oh, you know that many mass produced vegetables have less nutrients than organically grown ones? No doubt the utter basic fact of that, which can be proved through chemical analysis, will be denied by Fistedchuff no doubt)

                      I have no idea what you're talking about, but I doubt it. It's a purely empirical claim, and if I know the mind of Fisticuffs at all it is that he would avoid saying that if he didn't know it for sure. If my memory serves me, which it rarely does, so I could be completely wrong about this, but I seem to recall that Fisticuffs was a biochemist or some such at one point.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        He said that to imply that before then people werent able to take extra vitamines thus refuting my statement that vitamins had been known about for centuries and had been used sucessfully to trreat scurvy refuting his argument that vitamins are crap. That is the train of his deranged arguing, if you are going to jump in half way, keep track of the whole thing. Of course he is also wrong, you can take vitamins through food in general. Is not lime juice a supliment? The British Navy used it expressly as that. Yest accordijng to Fistedchuff a supliment has to be a pill. Typical doctor, obsessed with his own superiority but actually intelectually limited and logically fallacious.

                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        soap brain
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #185

                        Erudite__Eric wrote:

                        He said that to imply that before then people werent able to take extra vitamines thus refuting my statement that vitamins had been known about for centuries and had been used sucessfully to trreat scurvy refuting his argument that vitamins are crap.

                        Wharrgarbl[^]

                        Erudite__Eric wrote:

                        That is the train of his deranged arguing, if you are going to jump in half way, keep track of the whole thing.

                        I actually have read the whole thing. To be perfectly blunt, Fisticuffs has handed your arse to you.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S soap brain

                          Erudite__Eric wrote:

                          Who the f*** said they are? He called them crap, I pointed out his stupidity.

                          That's a very unsophisticated attempt at understanding what he said. When a chiropractor sells vitamins to a patient for something other than vitamin deficiency, chiropractic is garbage.

                          Erudite__Eric wrote:

                          (Oh, you know that many mass produced vegetables have less nutrients than organically grown ones? No doubt the utter basic fact of that, which can be proved through chemical analysis, will be denied by Fistedchuff no doubt)

                          I have no idea what you're talking about, but I doubt it. It's a purely empirical claim, and if I know the mind of Fisticuffs at all it is that he would avoid saying that if he didn't know it for sure. If my memory serves me, which it rarely does, so I could be completely wrong about this, but I seem to recall that Fisticuffs was a biochemist or some such at one point.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #186

                          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                          When a chiropractor sells vitamins to a patient for something other than vitamin deficiency, chiropractic is garbage.

                          When a doctor recomends more expensive medcines because he gets a kick back from a particular medical company, and the tax payer foots the bill, what is that doctor? (And yes, that has happened).

                          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                          It's a purely empirical claim

                          Yes, it actually has hard evidence, so how can you doubt it?

                          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                          Fisticuffs was a biochemist or some such at one point.

                          Who knows, this is the internet, he hides, as do all of us, behind a persona. :)

                          ============================== Nothing to say.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S soap brain

                            Erudite__Eric wrote:

                            He said that to imply that before then people werent able to take extra vitamines thus refuting my statement that vitamins had been known about for centuries and had been used sucessfully to trreat scurvy refuting his argument that vitamins are crap.

                            Wharrgarbl[^]

                            Erudite__Eric wrote:

                            That is the train of his deranged arguing, if you are going to jump in half way, keep track of the whole thing.

                            I actually have read the whole thing. To be perfectly blunt, Fisticuffs has handed your arse to you.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #187

                            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                            Wharrgarbl[^]

                            Give up eh?

                            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                            To be perfectly blunt, Fisticuffs has handed your arse to you.

                            Only if you choose to ingore facts.

                            ============================== Nothing to say.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                              When a chiropractor sells vitamins to a patient for something other than vitamin deficiency, chiropractic is garbage.

                              When a doctor recomends more expensive medcines because he gets a kick back from a particular medical company, and the tax payer foots the bill, what is that doctor? (And yes, that has happened).

                              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                              It's a purely empirical claim

                              Yes, it actually has hard evidence, so how can you doubt it?

                              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                              Fisticuffs was a biochemist or some such at one point.

                              Who knows, this is the internet, he hides, as do all of us, behind a persona. :)

                              ============================== Nothing to say.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              soap brain
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #188

                              Erudite__Eric wrote:

                              When a doctor recomends more expensive medcines because he gets a kick back from a particular medical company, and the tax payer foots the bill, what is that doctor?

                              Irrelevant to the argument?

                              Erudite__Eric wrote:

                              Yes, it actually has hard evidence, so how can you doubt it?

                              :confused:

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                Wharrgarbl[^]

                                Give up eh?

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                To be perfectly blunt, Fisticuffs has handed your arse to you.

                                Only if you choose to ingore facts.

                                ============================== Nothing to say.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                soap brain
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #189

                                Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                Give up eh?

                                No, it was just a very difficult sentence to parse. It was long after I posted that I understood it.

                                Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                Only if you choose to ingore facts.

                                The fact being that sailors were given a diet that contains vitamin C...?

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S soap brain

                                  Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                  When a doctor recomends more expensive medcines because he gets a kick back from a particular medical company, and the tax payer foots the bill, what is that doctor?

                                  Irrelevant to the argument?

                                  Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                  Yes, it actually has hard evidence, so how can you doubt it?

                                  :confused:

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #190

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  Irrelevant to the argument?

                                  Only in the narrowest of senses.

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  :confused:

                                  You said it had empiricle evidence, yet you doubted it.

                                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S soap brain

                                    Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                    Give up eh?

                                    No, it was just a very difficult sentence to parse. It was long after I posted that I understood it.

                                    Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                    Only if you choose to ingore facts.

                                    The fact being that sailors were given a diet that contains vitamin C...?

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #191

                                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                    No, it was just a very difficult sentence to parse. It was long after I posted that I understood it.

                                    :)

                                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                    The fact being that sailors were given a diet that contains vitamin C...?

                                    Yes, that is one fact showing that even if vitamines were not so named and were not produced artificially the benefits of said compunds were known.

                                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      Irrelevant to the argument?

                                      Only in the narrowest of senses.

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      :confused:

                                      You said it had empiricle evidence, yet you doubted it.

                                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      soap brain
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #192

                                      Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                      You said it had empiricle evidence, yet you doubted it.

                                      I meant I doubted that Fisticuffs would say it.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        No, it was just a very difficult sentence to parse. It was long after I posted that I understood it.

                                        :)

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        The fact being that sailors were given a diet that contains vitamin C...?

                                        Yes, that is one fact showing that even if vitamines were not so named and were not produced artificially the benefits of said compunds were known.

                                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        soap brain
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #193

                                        Erudite__Eric wrote:

                                        Yes, that is one fact showing that even if vitamines were not so named and were not produced artificially the benefits of said compunds were known.

                                        Therefore munching vitamin C tablets every day is beneficial?

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J jschell

                                          Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                          Again are you really that dence? For one, this was a hypothetical situation. Therefore you can not use the 'outcome' of it as evidence, for it has not happened. For two, my argument was it will not be released due to profit decline.

                                          Not sure what you are talking about but wrong for several issues. Some possible guesses as to what you are referring. First obviously the battery market is not hypothetical. It is making money and it is doing so by making a battery that lasts longer. Second on average business people make business decisions about what they think the market will do. They have no special abilities that allow them to see the future. Thus if they make a product that lasts longer they do so with the hope that is will increase revenue.

                                          Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                          My point was the competition gets squashed out.

                                          And my point is that you are wrong. And your Durcell example specifically demonstrates that you are wrong.

                                          Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                          I gave you many examples of larger companies squashing competition ragardless of their innovations. Have you ever heard of Patent Trolls? Guess not. Simply put you are dead wrong here. I have given you ample evidence supporting it yet you have provided no counter evidence.

                                          And your assertions on that topic are nonsense. In any number of ways especially as it applies to the automobile market. There is NO way that any of the tactics that you are referring to can broadly impact the automobile market. And as a specific example of that, many countries either do not respect the patent process that you refer to with "Patent Trolls" or the enforcement in the country is so lax that the country might as well not be part of the process. And many more countries are more likely to only enforce infringement that is blinding obvious.

                                          Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                          Nope. You still have not provided any evidence disproving what I have said or facts I have given

                                          Sorry? Are you claiming that the battery market has NOT been actively creating and marketing batteries that last longer for years?

                                          Collin Jasnoch wrote:

                                          It is about 'infinite' battery life....

                                          Thought I made it clear...I will try again... Please read the followin

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #194

                                          jschell wrote:

                                          First obviously the battery market is not hypothetical.

                                          Not about the market. It is about the situation. You again, clearly have not the ability to play thought games.

                                          jschell wrote:

                                          And my point is that you are wrong. And your Durcell example specifically demonstrates that you are wrong.

                                          Actually it means you can't read.

                                          jschell wrote:

                                          And your assertions on that topic are nonsense. In any number of ways especially as it applies to the automobile market. There is NO way that any of the tactics that you are referring to can broadly impact the automobile market. And as a specific example of that, many countries either do not respect the patent process that you refer to with "Patent Trolls" or the enforcement in the country is so lax that the country might as well not be part of the process. And many more countries are more likely to only enforce infringement that is blinding obvious.

                                          Wow, so you can't argue against the Patent issues so you claim now that patents aren't enforced and that patents do not apply to automobiles. Lets go back to your first issue. References[^]. References[^]. References[^]

                                          jschell wrote:

                                          Sorry? Are you claiming that the battery market has NOT been actively creating and marketing batteries that last longer for years?

                                          No, because again you do not know how to read. Not even going to reference the posts. Go back and figure it out yourself. The thought excersize was meant for you, but clearly your brain does not excersize enough so you stumbled and got hung up on the hypothetical details.

                                          jschell wrote:

                                          Thought I made it clear...I will try again...
                                           
                                          Please read the following carefully...I reject the assumption itself of a battery with an infinit

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups