Why Obama needs to be the next President.
-
It is Super Tuesday, and if Mitt Romney does manage to take a substantial lead, people of America need to question their vote. This is Mitt Romney, who lost to John McCain in the 2008 race. Not forgetting that John McCain was the man who lost to GWB in the 2000 campaign. You cannot vote into an office a man who was not good enough to beat the man who was not good enough to beat George W Bush!
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live
-
1. I have had some people get offended by my conservative views and they mark my posts as SPAM, which is minus 100 or something. I know 2 of the people that did it and if I had any feelings, I would probably care. 2. I have no idea what the magnets refer to. I feel like there must be an inside joke I don't know about.
-
You don't even live in the US, so of course you want the worse possible President for us. Still bitter over that thing a couple of hundred years ago. :) Obama is way worse than Bush. Obama is radical, leftist, socialist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, etc, etc. I saw a sign the other day that mentioned our gas was $1.78/gallon when Obama took office and now it is $3.70/gallon, how's that for change? Ya, Obama is no good.
Where the HELL was gas $1.78 four years ago? It was hitting $4 during some points of the Bush administration. It goes up and down due to the whims of some rich people and the fears of some other people. It may be more complicated than that. But I've stopped caring.
Look at me still talking when there's science to do When I look out there it makes me glad I'm not you
-
So, I am curious to find out what you know that I don't about Mormons. What do you have against them?
ryanb31 wrote:
So, I am curious to find out what you know that I don't about Mormons. What do you have against them?
Romney will force us to get more wives! One is more than enough!
Look at me still talking when there's science to do When I look out there it makes me glad I'm not you
-
ryanb31 wrote:
So, I am curious to find out what you know that I don't about Mormons. What do you have against them?
Romney will force us to get more wives! One is more than enough!
Look at me still talking when there's science to do When I look out there it makes me glad I'm not you
-
It is Super Tuesday, and if Mitt Romney does manage to take a substantial lead, people of America need to question their vote. This is Mitt Romney, who lost to John McCain in the 2008 race. Not forgetting that John McCain was the man who lost to GWB in the 2000 campaign. You cannot vote into an office a man who was not good enough to beat the man who was not good enough to beat George W Bush!
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live
The real issue is Obama is not even (likely) a citizen of the United States which goes against our constitution. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8&feature=player_embedded[^] The first clip may be doctored but most of them are not. And, the main point still stands even if Obama did or did not admit it himself. He is not eligible to be the President, yet there he is. That is what is most messed up.
-
Where the HELL was gas $1.78 four years ago? It was hitting $4 during some points of the Bush administration. It goes up and down due to the whims of some rich people and the fears of some other people. It may be more complicated than that. But I've stopped caring.
Look at me still talking when there's science to do When I look out there it makes me glad I'm not you
-
You don't even live in the US, so of course you want the worse possible President for us. Still bitter over that thing a couple of hundred years ago. :) Obama is way worse than Bush. Obama is radical, leftist, socialist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, etc, etc. I saw a sign the other day that mentioned our gas was $1.78/gallon when Obama took office and now it is $3.70/gallon, how's that for change? Ya, Obama is no good.
ryanb31 wrote:
Obama is way worse than Bush. Obama is radical, leftist, socialist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, etc, etc.
And I guess Bush deserves saint hood huh.... Good god man, he is wanted for crimes against humanity. Saying he is better than Obama is like saying Hitler was better than Stalin.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
So, I am curious to find out what you know that I don't about Mormons. What do you have against them?
They believe this... Smith said he found the plates on September 22, 1823 at a hill near his home in Manchester, New York after an angel directed him to a buried stone box. The angel at first prevented Smith from taking the plates because he had not followed the angel's instructions. In 1827, on his fourth annual attempt to retrieve the plates, Smith returned home with a heavy object wrapped in a frock, which he then put in a box. Though he allowed others to heft the box, he said that the angel had forbidden him to show the plates to anyone until they had been translated from their original "reformed Egyptian " language. Smith dictated a translation using a seer stone in the bottom of a hat, which he placed over his face to view the words written within the stone.[3] Smith published the translation in 1830 as the Book of Mormon . Smith eventually obtained testimonies from eleven men, known as the Book of Mormon witnesses , who said they had seen the plates.[4] After the translation was complete, Smith said he returned the plates to their angelic guardian . Therefore, if the plates existed, they cannot now be examined. Latter Day Saints believe the account of the golden plates as a matter of faith, while critics often assert that either Smith manufactured the plates himself[5] or that the Book of Mormon witnesses based their testimony on visions rather than physical experience.
-
ryanb31 wrote:
Obama is way worse than Bush. Obama is radical, leftist, socialist, anti-American, anti-Constitution, etc, etc.
And I guess Bush deserves saint hood huh.... Good god man, he is wanted for crimes against humanity. Saying he is better than Obama is like saying Hitler was better than Stalin.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
They believe this... Smith said he found the plates on September 22, 1823 at a hill near his home in Manchester, New York after an angel directed him to a buried stone box. The angel at first prevented Smith from taking the plates because he had not followed the angel's instructions. In 1827, on his fourth annual attempt to retrieve the plates, Smith returned home with a heavy object wrapped in a frock, which he then put in a box. Though he allowed others to heft the box, he said that the angel had forbidden him to show the plates to anyone until they had been translated from their original "reformed Egyptian " language. Smith dictated a translation using a seer stone in the bottom of a hat, which he placed over his face to view the words written within the stone.[3] Smith published the translation in 1830 as the Book of Mormon . Smith eventually obtained testimonies from eleven men, known as the Book of Mormon witnesses , who said they had seen the plates.[4] After the translation was complete, Smith said he returned the plates to their angelic guardian . Therefore, if the plates existed, they cannot now be examined. Latter Day Saints believe the account of the golden plates as a matter of faith, while critics often assert that either Smith manufactured the plates himself[5] or that the Book of Mormon witnesses based their testimony on visions rather than physical experience.
I asked what you have against Mormons, so I guess this is your answer? Aside from a few small things this is pretty accurate. So? Do you have a problem with Mormons believing God spoke to man? Or that an angel appeared to him? Or that he translated scripture by the power of God? I am curious, what exactly bothers you about this? If you don't believe it, then so what?
-
I asked what you have against Mormons, so I guess this is your answer? Aside from a few small things this is pretty accurate. So? Do you have a problem with Mormons believing God spoke to man? Or that an angel appeared to him? Or that he translated scripture by the power of God? I am curious, what exactly bothers you about this? If you don't believe it, then so what?
-
Try googling it and take your pick. Not only that take a look at Historical rankings[^] I see no poll that puts Bush above Obama. Except this "Looking at the list of presidents since World War II, which one do you think is the worst president?" 1.George W. Bush (27%) 2. Barack Obama (22%) And in case you did not read that right, WORST president. And FYI Fox News is about as accurate as the Daily Show.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
About what? Can you answer? What do you have a problem with? If you believe in the Bible you shouldn't have a problem with anything regarding Joseph Smith.
-
Try googling it and take your pick. Not only that take a look at Historical rankings[^] I see no poll that puts Bush above Obama. Except this "Looking at the list of presidents since World War II, which one do you think is the worst president?" 1.George W. Bush (27%) 2. Barack Obama (22%) And in case you did not read that right, WORST president. And FYI Fox News is about as accurate as the Daily Show.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
ryanb31 wrote:
My points was if he is "wanted" why hasn't he been arrested?
Ahh yeah. Do you really think the US would let one of their presidents go on trial? I mean, I did not like the guy but I even think it would be stupid to allow that to happen. However, it says what kind of president he was.
ryanb31 wrote:
Who brought up FoxNews?
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4182470/Re-Why-Obama-needs-to-be-the-next-President.aspx[^]
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
ryanb31 wrote:
My points was if he is "wanted" why hasn't he been arrested?
Ahh yeah. Do you really think the US would let one of their presidents go on trial? I mean, I did not like the guy but I even think it would be stupid to allow that to happen. However, it says what kind of president he was.
ryanb31 wrote:
Who brought up FoxNews?
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4182470/Re-Why-Obama-needs-to-be-the-next-President.aspx[^]
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.